No Slide Title

More documents

Recommendations

Info

The Provigo Decision But, Provigo had a subsidiary argument… - 9173-1588 Québec Inc. had expressly assumed another of Bombardier’s obligations: to maintain same parking ratio on its land as was maintained on Provigo’s land. - Provigo argued that 9173-1588 Québec Inc. couldn’t maintain this parking ratio with a supermarket on its land so the supermarket would need to be demolished. 96
The Provigo Decision - The zoning by-law in place when Provigo built its supermarket was changed in 2009 to reduce the minimum number of required spaces and to set a maximum number of permitted spaces. - Because Provigo built its parking lot prior to 2009, it benefitted from acquired rights to maintain a higher number of parking spaces than the new zoning by-law allowed, but 9173-1588 Québec Inc. did not, because Métro-Richelieu only built its parking in 2010. 97
Page 1 and 2:
Développements récents dans le do
Page 3 and 4:
Financing
Page 5 and 6:
Prepayment Right Section 10(1) of t
Page 7 and 8:
Prepayment Right What did this mean
Page 9 and 10:
Prepayment Right The federal govern
Page 11 and 12:
Cautionnement L’article 123.66 de
Page 13 and 14:
Cautionnement - octroi d’un cauti
Page 15 and 16:
Cautionnement Épiciers Unis Métro
Page 17 and 18:
Obligation to provide information t
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Dépôts de garantie, retenues et c
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Article 2692 CCQ Hypothecs
Page 35 and 36:
Article 2692 CCQ In what context mi
Page 37 and 38:
The Positron Decision Facts (contin
Page 39 and 40:
The Positron Decision Facts (contin
Page 41 and 42:
The Positron Decision When is 2692
Page 43 and 44:
The Positron Decision What the deci
Page 45 and 46: Règlement législatif des difficul
Page 47 and 48: Règlement législatif des difficul
Page 49 and 50: Additional Hypothecs Banque Nationa
Page 51 and 52: The Larouche Decision The deed cont
Page 53 and 54: The Larouche Decision Facts (contin
Page 55 and 56: The Larouche Decision Judge decided
Page 57 and 58: The Larouche Decision Practical Sol
Page 59 and 60: L'arrêt Indalex de la Cour d'appel
Page 75 and 76: Transfer duties in Montreal
Page 77 and 78: Transfer Duties Basis of Imposition
Page 79 and 80: Sultan v. Gitman Sultan v. Gitman 2
Page 81 and 82: Sultan v. Gitman The clause in the
Page 83 and 84: Sultan v. Gitman In spite of all th
Page 85 and 86: Sultan v. Gitman Gitman appealed th
Page 87 and 88: Copropriété divise : jurisprudenc
Page 89 and 90: Copropriété divise : jurisprudenc
Page 91 and 92: The Provigo Decision Provigo Distri
Page 93 and 94: The Provigo Decision Facts (continu
Page 95: The Provigo Decision Decision with
Page 99 and 100: The Provigo Decision The Court conc
show all

No Slide Title

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?