02.06.2013 Views

Rapporto finale/ Final Report (ITA-ENG) - Casa di Carità Arti e Mestieri

Rapporto finale/ Final Report (ITA-ENG) - Casa di Carità Arti e Mestieri

Rapporto finale/ Final Report (ITA-ENG) - Casa di Carità Arti e Mestieri

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE VARIOUS TOPICS FOR DIALOGUE ON DISCRIMINATION<br />

AND INTOLERANCE<br />

57<br />

While the underlying problems were fairly similar across the various contexts, the places and young<br />

people involved were, instead, a very <strong>di</strong>verse assortment (public and private schools, vocational<br />

training centres and a youth detention centre). This resulted in an extremely variegated set of topics<br />

to be addressed and methods to be adopted to analyse the many-sided issue of <strong>di</strong>scrimination.<br />

In the early stages of the project, one issue that was identified as a central concern in all four countries<br />

was the analysis of social reactions to <strong>di</strong>scrimination, i.e. the behaviour of pupils, teachers, head<br />

teachers, family members and the group, observed at school when aggressive incidents associated<br />

with racism and xenophobia occur. This very important question was, however, <strong>di</strong>fficult to investigate<br />

in practice and therefore only marginally addressed. Nonetheless, it remains a fundamental issue<br />

which could be reconsidered in similar projects in future, in order to look closely at how the various<br />

educational contexts deal with the problem of <strong>di</strong>scrimination.<br />

The issue in question was mainly addressed by exploring two thematic threads, which can be<br />

“classified” a posteriori accor<strong>di</strong>ng to the type of approach. On the one hand, the issue was examined<br />

from a cultural and geopolitical perspective. This approach focused on ethnic and religious <strong>di</strong>fferences<br />

and the way these affect the definition of stereotypes and perceptions about other people and their<br />

world. It also examined aspects of political and institutional <strong>di</strong>scrimination and ways in which the<br />

<strong>di</strong>fferent kinds of <strong>di</strong>scrimination prevent the full exercise of citizenship rights and co-existence.<br />

On the other hand, it was addressed from the interpersonal perspective, in terms of how people<br />

experience and are subject to <strong>di</strong>fferent forms of intolerance. Stories of people’s own experiences –<br />

as victims or <strong>di</strong>rect witnesses – were an important channel through which to foster <strong>di</strong>alogue on the<br />

various types of intolerance among young people. This approach examined the impact of the various<br />

forms of verbal and non-verbal interpersonal communication on relations between people, and their<br />

power to convey messages of tolerance or intolerance. In the majority of contexts the pupils found<br />

this to be a particularly interesting aspect, and were strongly affected by their peers’ experiences<br />

of <strong>di</strong>scrimination and fears. The outcomes of this approach were judged to be excellent, since the<br />

majority of pupils had experienced <strong>di</strong>scrimination either personally or in<strong>di</strong>rectly and reporting their<br />

experiences had a strong impact on the group.<br />

The issue was examined from both perspectives in most of the contexts, although there were some<br />

<strong>di</strong>fferences from country to country and in some cases with the emphasis on one perspective rather<br />

than on the other.<br />

In France, for example, more attention was paid to the cultural and geopolitical approach, especially<br />

by reflecting on current political affairs, the rise of xenophobic right-wing political parties in a number<br />

of European countries (this was done by working on scripts for plays concerned with the success of<br />

Le Pen in the 2002 presidential elections) and institutional <strong>di</strong>scrimination (such as the previouslymentioned<br />

EREAs - separate education establishments for children with learning problems, which<br />

result in pupils being somehow branded for life, <strong>di</strong>scriminated against by the school and by their<br />

peers). Much attention was also paid to <strong>di</strong>scrimination at the workplace and even in sports (inclu<strong>di</strong>ng<br />

at amateur level), in an effort to understand whether and how young people experience <strong>di</strong>scrimination.<br />

In Germany the accent was more on exploring the dynamics of interpersonal conflicts and social

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!