Folia Geographica 10. sÄjums - Latvijas UniversitÄte

More documents

Recommendations

Info

DABAS PĒTĪJUMIyoung tree layer in such biogeoceonoses is composed of hornbeam as much as of lime andspruce. The biogeoceonoses where hornbeam codominates lie along the valley slope or along itscrossing ravines, but on the insufficiently drained positions and drainage-divide locations thehornbeam is lacking (Figure 6). From the described 38 biogeoceonoses, more like the zonalclimax, might be:- lime-hornbeam forest with scattered spruce and aspen trees and rarely hornbeam in theregrowth and Stellaria holostea, S. nemorium, Galeobdolon luteum, Galium odoratum, Oxalisacetosella in the ground layer (relevé 1a);- hornbeam’s forest with spruce at the lower tree strata, lime, hornbeam and spruceregrowth and Galeobdolon luteum, Oxalis acetosella, Stellaria holostea, Galium odoratum inthe ground layer (relevé 3 & Figure 7).Although these biogeoceonoses are protected, some forest-purifying work has been doneto facilitate the hornbeam’s predominance over other tree species (mainly in the relevé 1a). Inthe phytosociological aspect these biogeoceonoses are classified as the communities belongingto association Tilio-Carpinetum, subassociation typicum [Laiviņš 1991]. The soils are formed onbipartite uncalcareous parent material (loamy sand on boulder loam), possessing highly activeacidity and a low base saturation percentage, as well as some podzolation features in theirmorphological profile; on the other hand, the podzolized layer is not clearly present (Tables 3 &4). Such characteristics are more like the subassociation calamogrostetosum or even like thesoils of coniferous forests [Kwiatkowski, Pedrotti 1994]; yet, increased calcium cation contentin the litter layer and a particularly well developed humus layer might be explained by thedeciduous tree (including hornbeam) stands influence on the soils. In the terms of zonalclassification, these biogeoceonoses might be called boreo-nemoral.To the contrary, in the model area of Sventāja, hornbeam is present in the river valley(Figure 8 & 10). Yet it grows on the flood plain’s flaky alluvial deposits (loamy sand in upperparts and sand below), forming remarkably species-richer mixed deciduous forest stands as inLukna, not encountering the competition with spruce. A small hornbeam cluster used to growhere [Kiršteins, Eiche 1933], but nowadays biogeoceonoses close to edaphic sub-climaxstadium with nemoral zone’s species prevalence had grown up. It is an oak-hornbeam forest thatin the upper tree strata and young tree layer also includes lime, maple (Acer platanoides) andash (Fraxinus excelsior). The shrub layer is composed of Padus avium, Sorbus aucuparia, aswell as Corylus avellana, Ribes rubrum, Rhamnus cathartica and an existent wide diversity(Convallaria majalis, Polygonatum multiflorum, Chrysosplenium alternifolium, Aegopodiumpodograria, Urtica dioica, Filipendula ulmaria) in ground cover (Figure 11). Influenced bysuch rich vegetation as well as by additional nutrient supply precipitating from flood water, thesoils possess not only high humus content but also neutral reaction and high basic saturation(Tables 3 & 4). In zonal terms, such biogeoceonoses refer to the nemoral type.Therefore heteronomous / transit position of the small river flood plain proves to be morefavourable for the hornbeam than autonomous / transit locations on the ground moraine plainoutside the valleys. However the hornbeam manages to compete with other species (includingspruce) and influence the communities and soils under both conditions; it is presently a ratherprogressive than regressive species in its northern distribution boundary in Latvia.AtsaucesBasalykas A. (ed.) (1958). Lietuvos TSR fizinė geografija I. Vilnius: Valstibine politines irmokslines literatūros leidykla, 504 lpp.Bušs K. (1981). Meža ekoloģija un tipoloģija. Rīga: Zinātne, 64 lpp.Géographie de la Lorraine (1983). dir. René Frécaut. Nancy: Presses Universitaires deNancy, pp. 3-119.Jahn G. (1991). Temperate deciduous forests of Europe. Ecosystems of the World, vol. 7.Temperate Deciduous Forests, eds. E. Röhrig and B.Ulrich. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 377 -505.46
NATURE RESEARCHKiršteins K., Eiche V. (1933). Baltā skābarža (Carpinus betulus L.) dabiskā izplatība unekoloģija Latvijā. LU Raksti. Lauksaimn. fak. sēr. 2., Nr. 13. Rīga, 343.- 448. lpp.Kwiatkowski W., Chojnacki T. (1994). Experiences of Polish Authors. Phytocoenosis, vol.6(N.S.). Supplementum Cartographiae Geobotanicae 4. Warszawa-Białowieża, pp. 119-125.Kwiatkowski W., Pedrotti F. (1994). Determinism and the origin of vegetation differentiation.Geo-ecological forest landscapes. Phytocoenosis, vol.6 (N.S.). Supplementum CartographiaeGeobotanicae 4. Warszawa-Białowieża, pp. 119-125.Laiviņš M. (2000). Baltā skābarža (Carpinus betulus L.) audze Sventājas upes ielejā. II Latvijasģeogrāfijas kongress. Rīga: Latvijas ģeogrāfijas biedrība, 33.-35. lpp.Laiviņš M. (1992). Luknas skābaržu audze. Botāniskie liegumi. Rīga: Zinātne, 14.-35. lpp.Laiviņš M. (1991). Klassifikation der Linden-Heinbuchengesselschaften (Tilio-Carpinentum) inLitauen und Lettland. Veröff. Geobot. Inst. ETH, Stiftung Rübel, Bd. 106. Zürich, S. 35-52Meteoroloģisko novērojumu dati par 1928.-1929. gadu Liepājai. Valsts Hidrometeoroloģiskāspārvaldes datu fonda materiāli (nepublicēts).Ozenda P. (1994). Végétation du Continent Européen. Lausanne – Paris: Delachaux et Niestlé,271 pp.Puhe J., Ulrich B. (2001). Global Climate Change and Human Impacts on Forest Ecosystems:postglacial development, present situation, and future trends in Central Europe. Ecologicalstudies, vol. 143. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 594 pp.Segliņš V. (2001). Holocēna nogulumu stratigrāfija Latvijā un to starpreģionālā korelācija.Rīga: Latvijas Universitāte, 193 lpp.Sjörs H. (1963). Amphi-Atlantic zonation, Nemoral to Arctic. North Atlantic Biota and TheirHistor. ed. A. Löve and D. Löve. Oxford: Pergamon Press, pp. 109-125.Taksācijas apraksts. 1999. g. inventarizācija. Dunikas mežniecība (2000). Liepāja: SIA Latvijasmežu ierīcība (nepublicēts).Заповедники СССР: Заповедники Прибалтики и Белоруссии (1989). Москва: Мысль,320 с.Природа Белоруссии (1986). Минск: Белорусская Советская Энциклопедия, 600 с.Влажность воздуха, атмосферные осадки, снежный покров (1968). Справочник поклимату СССР. Латвийская ССР. Часть IV. Ленинград: Гидрометеоиздат. 210 c.Температура воздуха и почвы (1965). Справочник по климату СССР. Латвийская ССР.Часть II. Ленинград: Гидрометеоиздат, 192 c.Юркевич И. Д., Тютюнов А. З. (1985). Грабовые леса Белоруссии: типология,структура, продуктивность. Москва: Наука и техника, 201 с.Interneta resursihttp://www.latvijasdaba.lv/aizsardziba/teritorijas.htmlhttp://www.varam.gov.lv/vad/Latviski/Likumd/MK/117.htmhttp://www.geo.arizona.edu/palynology/geos462/02holocene.html47
Page 1 and 2: ĢEOGRĀFISKI RAKSTIFOLIA GEOGRAPHI
Page 3 and 4: CILVĒKS UN VIDESatursAija MellumaA
Page 5 and 6: MAN AND ENVIRONMENTAinava kā attī
Page 7 and 8: MAN AND ENVIRONMENTun (2) ka dažā
Page 9 and 10: MAN AND ENVIRONMENT1. attēls. Kurz
Page 11 and 12: MAN AND ENVIRONMENTKā atsevišķs
Page 13 and 14: MAN AND ENVIRONMENTautoceļa aizsar
Page 15 and 16: MAN AND ENVIRONMENTKurzeme region t
Page 17 and 18: NATURE RESEARCH2. attēls. Eiropas
Page 19 and 20: NATURE RESEARCHautonomais (neatkar
Page 21 and 22: NATURE RESEARCHtemperatūra nav zem
Page 23 and 24: NATURE RESEARCHietekmei - pie tam,
Page 25 and 26: NATURE RESEARCHpirmajām - arī “
Page 27 and 28: NATURE RESEARCHveģetācijas period
Page 29 and 30: NATURE RESEARCHputekšņu diagramma
Page 31 and 32: NATURE RESEARCHdabas liegumā. Skā
Page 33 and 34: NATURE RESEARCHparādās divos neda
Page 35 and 36: NATURE RESEARCHsadalījušos nobiru
Page 37 and 38: NATURE RESEARCHRhytiadelphys trique
Page 39 and 40: NATURE RESEARCHTādējādi lielai d
Page 41 and 42: NATURE RESEARCHatrasts - tāpat kā
Page 43 and 44: NATURE RESEARCHAugsnes rakums izdar
Page 45: NATURE RESEARCHcodominant species o
Page 49 and 50: NATURE RESEARCH3. Results and discu
Page 51 and 52: NATURE RESEARCHConcentrations of ca
Page 53 and 54: NATURE RESEARCHbiological transform
Page 55 and 56: HUMAN GEOGRAPHYMigrācijas procesi
Page 57 and 58: HUMAN GEOGRAPHYSavukārt republikas
Page 59 and 60: 592. attēls. Migrācijas reģioni
Page 61 and 62: HUMAN GEOGRAPHYvirzītas uz vietām
Page 63 and 64: HUMAN GEOGRAPHYMarkausa I.M. (2001)
Page 65 and 66: HUMAN GEOGRAPHYRaugoties no augšan
Page 67 and 68: HUMAN GEOGRAPHYSociālekonomisko r
Page 69 and 70: HUMAN GEOGRAPHYsadalījums Latvijas
Page 71 and 72: HUMAN GEOGRAPHY3. attēls. Latvijas
Page 73 and 74: HUMAN GEOGRAPHYSecinājumiKoncentr
Page 75 and 76: DEVELOPMENT OF PLACES AND REGIONSCh
Page 77 and 78: DEVELOPMENT OF PLACES AND REGIONSFi
Page 79 and 80: DEVELOPMENT OF PLACES AND REGIONSTa
Page 81 and 82: DEVELOPMENT OF PLACES AND REGIONSTa
Page 83 and 84: DEVELOPMENT OF PLACES AND REGIONSar
Page 85 and 86: DEVELOPMENT OF PLACES AND REGIONSec
Page 87 and 88: DEVELOPMENT OF PLACES AND REGIONSIn
Page 89 and 90: DEVELOPMENT OF PLACES AND REGIONSFr
Page 91 and 92: DEVELOPMENT OF PLACES AND REGIONSPi
Page 93 and 94: DEVELOPMENT OF PLACES AND REGIONSno
Page 95 and 96: DEVELOPMENT OF PLACES AND REGIONSpi
Page 97 and 98:
DEVELOPMENT OF PLACES AND REGIONS3.
Page 99 and 100:
DEVELOPMENT OF PLACES AND REGIONSr
Page 101 and 102:
DEVELOPMENT OF PLACES AND REGIONSDi
Page 103 and 104:
DEVELOPMENT OF PLACES AND REGIONSbr
Page 105 and 106:
DEVELOPMENT OF PLACES AND REGIONS8.
Page 107 and 108:
CHRONICLELatvijas Ģeogrāfijas bie
Page 109:
AUTORIAUTHORSAndris Bauls, Dr.geogr
show all

Folia Geographica 10. sÄjums - Latvijas UniversitÄte

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?

Folia Geographica 10. sÄjums - Latvijas UniversitÄte