02.09.2013 Views

Jaarboek Thomas Instituut 1995 - Thomas Instituut te Utrecht

Jaarboek Thomas Instituut 1995 - Thomas Instituut te Utrecht

Jaarboek Thomas Instituut 1995 - Thomas Instituut te Utrecht

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

18 H.W.M. RIKHOF<br />

book about Kreling, la<strong>te</strong> professor in Dogmatic Theology at the<br />

Catholic University of Nijmegen. Although he wri<strong>te</strong>s a long and<br />

substantial article about Kreling, in this analysis his own views shine<br />

through, both in his criticism on certain shortcomings of Kreling's<br />

theology as in the apparent sympathy with which he wri<strong>te</strong>s. Kreling,<br />

he remarks somewhere else in a commemorative article, is in many<br />

respects his <strong>te</strong>acher, because he was taught dogmatic theology by one<br />

of Kreling's pupils, Haarsma, and for a short period by Kreling<br />

himself. "But perhaps Kreling became mostly my <strong>te</strong>acher af<strong>te</strong>r his<br />

death, when I star<strong>te</strong>d to read and study all his work" (29, p. 392).<br />

De Grijs' affinity with Kreling's con<strong>te</strong>mplative theology<br />

shows itself in his use of <strong>te</strong>rms charac<strong>te</strong>ristic of this type of theology<br />

in most of his articles: "open" and "openness", "receptive" and<br />

"receptivity" , "inclined to". The <strong>te</strong>rms indica<strong>te</strong> the passive<br />

charac<strong>te</strong>ristics of the in<strong>te</strong>llect, "direc<strong>te</strong>d rather to receive knowledge<br />

and understanding than. to take or to make it" (30, p. 71). Because of<br />

this receptivity, theological in<strong>te</strong>rpretation or theological hermeneia is<br />

understood primarily as understanding and not as translating. Because<br />

of this receptivity, the theologian needs a certain discipline, a certain<br />

in<strong>te</strong>llectual attitude: "to be open for the reality of the divine mys<strong>te</strong>ry<br />

implies for the theologian that his personal prejudices, insights,<br />

feelings are kept back fully and consciously" (30, p. 87). When on<br />

this point De Grijs voices some criticism on Kreling, it becomes clear<br />

that this reticence is not so easily reached and is certainly not meant as<br />

an escape. Kreling has not seen how deep 'in<strong>te</strong>res<strong>te</strong>dness' and<br />

historicity de<strong>te</strong>rmine theological thinking. Awareness of this<br />

de<strong>te</strong>rmination and a continuous reflection on one's own activity are<br />

required in order to think bet<strong>te</strong>r and purer (30, pp. 87-88). This<br />

insight De Grijs expresses also as the metanoia essential for doing<br />

theology. By metanoia he does not understand "some pious action",<br />

but that the theologian "let one's own exis<strong>te</strong>nce, life, concern, ideals,<br />

mind, heart be penetra<strong>te</strong>d - in a conscious, chosen, unconditional and<br />

permanent at<strong>te</strong>ntion to the Triune God, as the driving force and the<br />

principle of our searching, questioning and studying" (47, p. 365).<br />

His affinity with this type of theology shows itself also in his<br />

insis<strong>te</strong>nce on the need of concepts and of conceptual clarity. In a<br />

passage in one of the "Let<strong>te</strong>rs about time and e<strong>te</strong>rnity, living and<br />

dying, present and past" De Grijs makes this point about concepts in a

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!