02.09.2013 Views

Jaarboek Thomas Instituut 1995 - Thomas Instituut te Utrecht

Jaarboek Thomas Instituut 1995 - Thomas Instituut te Utrecht

Jaarboek Thomas Instituut 1995 - Thomas Instituut te Utrecht

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

20 H.W.M. RIKHOF<br />

human person, but it does mean that in faith the human person with<br />

the in<strong>te</strong>llect reaches towards the divine mys<strong>te</strong>ry. That is why insisting<br />

on receptivity, on the passive charac<strong>te</strong>ristics of the in<strong>te</strong>llect and on the<br />

corresponding attitude of the theologian, is so important, for this<br />

reaching can easily become capturing and mas<strong>te</strong>ring. That is why<br />

concepts are so important, for in concepts, in working with concepts<br />

the in<strong>te</strong>llect functions most specifically. Assensus in<strong>te</strong>llectus implies<br />

also freedom on the side of the human person. To assent presupposes<br />

not just some understanding, but also judgement and acceptance, and<br />

therefore freedom. Precisely because faith is concerned with con<strong>te</strong>nt,<br />

because faith is a free assent to God's revelation, theology as a<br />

'scientific' endeavour is possible.<br />

The affinity with this type of theology, with trancendental or<br />

con<strong>te</strong>mplative theology, does for De Grijs not amount to a dismissal of<br />

the ca<strong>te</strong>gorical reflection, as becomes clear in the critical remarks he<br />

makes about Kreling. They are rela<strong>te</strong>d to Kreling's hesitant<br />

appreciation of the emergence of positive theology and of its<br />

contribution to the whole of theology (30, pp. 83-84), to his<br />

concentration on the ascesis of the individual theologian (30, p. 87), to<br />

his negligence of one of the tasks of theology: to discuss the question<br />

of meaning (30, p. 91). Central to this criticism is the lack of<br />

historical awareness on behalf of Kreling.<br />

If one compares, though, Kreling's remarks about positrve<br />

theology and De Grijs' rendering and explanation of his hesistant<br />

attitude one can discover an in<strong>te</strong>resting nuance or difference. Kreling<br />

refers in an important speech to the attacks also within catholic<br />

theology on speculative, scholastic theology. "Speculative theology,<br />

deadly boring by the monotony of the same answers to the same<br />

questions, finds itself in competition with a new theology, that,<br />

equiped with the modem tools of historical work, presents constantly<br />

something new. Many positive theologians think therefore that only<br />

their discipline is important as living theology, so that speculative<br />

theology should vaca<strong>te</strong> it's privileged position" _2 So, Kreling sees the<br />

P. Kreling, "Het goddelijk geheim in de theologie", 1939, reprin<strong>te</strong>d<br />

in: Het Goddelijk Geheim. Theologisch werk van G.P. Kreling o.p.,<br />

uitgegeven en ingeleid door F.J.A. de Grijs, F. Haarsma, H.I. Kouwenhoven,<br />

LH. Roes en E.C.F.A. Schillebeeckx o.p., Kampen: Uitgeversmaatschappij

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!