Culture&Territories#3

Neighbourhood & City
of the best persuasive strategy option which can include improved carbon-based
indicators and other complementary information. Considering the complex regional
socio-technical system, the effectiveness of the PAMUS will depend on the
continuous commitment of policy makers at all levels of government, the funding of
regional actions and the commitment of cities and the stakeholders for continuing
working and implement the planned actions for achieving sustainability mobility goals.
REFERENCES
Abdel-Aziz, A. A.; Abdel-Salam, H.; El-Sayad, Z. (2016). The role of ICTs in creating the new social
place in the digital era, Alexandria Engineering Journal 55, 487-493.
Arsenio, E.; Martens, K.; Di Ciommo, F. (2016). Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans: bridging climate
change and equity targets?. Research in Transportation Economics, 55, 30-39. doi:
10.1016/j.retrec.2016.04.008.
CIVITAS 2020 Brochure, CIVITAS Satellite, funded by the H2020 programme. Retrieved February 27,
2018, from http://civitas.eu/sites/default/files/civitas2020-brochure.pdf
European Commission - EC (2014). Guidelines. Developing and implementing a sustainable urban
mobility plan (revised foreword). Brussels: Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport.
European Commission-EC (2013). Together towards competitive and resource-efficient urban mobility.
COM (2013) 913 final, Brussels.
European Commission-EC (2013a). Guidelines. Developing and implementing a sustainable urban
mobility plan. Brussels: Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport.
European Commission (2013b). “Inclusive innovation” and “service innovation”. High level economic
expert group innovation for growth, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Luxembourg:
Publications Office of the European Union.
European Commission (2011). Roadmap towards a single European transport area - Towards a
competitive and resource efficient transport system. COM (2011) 114 final, Brussels.
European Commission (2009). Action plan on urban mobility. COM (2013) 490 final, Brussels.
European Commission-EC (2005). Thematic strategy on the urban environment. Brussels.
Fogg, B. J. (2003). Persuasive technology: Using computers to change what we think and do. San
Francisco, CA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
Foth M., Brynskov M., Ojala T. (Eds) (2015). Citizen’s right to the digital city: urban interfaces, activism,
and placemaking, Singapore: Springer.
Heddebaut, O.; Arsenio, E.; Coelho, J. (2017). Sharing experiences on sustainable urban mobility plans:
the case of Lille Metropolitan Area and the Algarve Polycentric Region, Proceedings of the 45 th
European Transport Conference 2017, 4 to 6 October, Barcelona.
Jacobs, J. (1961). The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Random House.
Owens, S. (1995). From “predict and provide” to “predict and prevent”?: pricing and planning in
transport policy. Transport Policy, 2 (1), 43-49.
Gabrielli, S; Forbes, P.; Jylhä, A.; Wells, S.; Sirén, M.; Hemminki, S.; Nurmi, P.; Maimone, R.; Masthoff, J.;
Jacucci, G. (2014). Design challenges in motivating change for sustainable urban mobility, Computers
in Human Behavior, 41, 416-423.
Schrammel, J.; Busch, M.; Tscheligi, M. (2013). Peacox-persuasive advisor for CO2-reducing cross-modal
trip planning. First International Conference on Behavior Change Support Systems (BCSS 2013).
121