Culture&Territories#3

Neighbourhood & City
REFERENCES
Barajas, M., Magli, R., Owen, M., Safin, S. ,Toccafondi, G., Molari, G. (2006).“La Piazza” Convivial Spaces
for Inter-generational Learning: Which role can learning technologies play? In: A. Mendez -Vilas, A.
Solano Martin, J. Mesa-Gonzalez, J.A., Mesa Gonzalez (eds.) Current developments in computer-assisted
education. Badajoz: Formatex, 217-222.
Bauman, Z. (2005). Confiança e medo na cidade. Lisboa: Relógio d’Água.
Biggs, S. (2007). Thinking about generations: Conceptual positions and policy implications. Journal of
Social Issues, 63(4), 695-711.
Biggs, S., & Carr, A. (2015). Age and Child-Friendly Cities and the Promise of Intergenerational Space.
Journal of Social Work Practice, 29(1), 99-112.
Biggs, S., Carstensen, L., & Hogan, P. (2002). Social capital, lifelong learning and social innovation. In World
Economic Forum (Eds.), Global Population Ageing: Peril or Promise? (pp. 39–41). Retrieved from:
http://demographic-challenge.com/files/downloads/6c59e8722eec82f7ffa0f1158d0f4e59/ageingbook
_010612.pdf
Buffel, T., Phillipson, C., & Scharf, T. (2012). Ageing in urban environments: Developing “age-friendly”
cities. Critical Social Policy, 32(4), 597-617.
Dean, M. (1999). Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society (second edition). London: Sage
Publications.
Falconer, M. (2007). Out with “the old,” elderly, and aged. BMJ, 334:316
Futurelab (2008). Puente: intergenerational learning in public spaces, mediated by technology. Bristol:
Futurelab.
Hagestad, G. O., & Uhlenberg, P. (2005). The social separation of old and young: A root of ageism.
Journal of Social Issues, 61(2), 343-361.
Hagestad, G. O., & Uhlenberg, P. (2006). Should We Be Concerned About Age Segregation? Some
Theoretical and Empirical Explorations. Research on Aging, 28(6), 638-653.
Lowenstein, A., Katz, R., & Biggs, S. (2011). Rethinking theoretical and methodological issues in intergenerational
family relations research. Ageing and Society, 31(7), 1077-1083.
Menezes, M. & Smaniotto Costa, C. (2017). People, public space, digital technology and social practice:
an ethnographic approach. In A. Zammit & T. Kenna (Eds.), Enhancing Places through Technology.
Proceedings from the ICiTy conference. Valletta, Malta - 18-19 April, 2016 (pp. 167-180). Lisbon:
Edições Universitárias Lusófonas.
Mommaas, H. (2001). Modernidade, globalização e crise do modernismo social. Fragmentação urbana
em Tilburg. In C. Fortuna (Ed), Cidade, cultura e globalização. Ensaios de sociologia (pp. 165-187).
Oeiras: Celta Editora.
Puhakka, R., Poikolainen, J., & Karisto, A. (2015). Spatial practises and preferences of older and younger
people: findings from the Finnish studies. Journal of Social Work Practice, 29(1), 69-83.
Sánchez, M., Kaplan, M. S., & Bradley, L. (2015). Using technology to connect generations: Some
considerations of form and function. Comunicar, 23(45), 95-103. doi.org/10.3916/C45-2015-10
Sassen, S. (2000). New frontiers facing urban sociology at the Millennium. The British Journal of
Sociology, 51(1), 143-159. doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2000.00143.x
Uhlenberg, P. (2000). The Forum: Essays on Age Integration. The Gerontologist, 40(3), 261-308.
UN (CESCR) Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, General (1995). Comment No. 6:
The Economic, Social and Cultural Rights of Older Persons, 8 December 1995, E/1996/22. Retrieved
January 15, 2018 from: http://www.refworld.org/docid/4538838f11.html
307