26.02.2013 Views

Essays on Writing and Language in Honor - Sino-Platonic Papers

Essays on Writing and Language in Honor - Sino-Platonic Papers

Essays on Writing and Language in Honor - Sino-Platonic Papers

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2. General Remarks <strong>on</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese Adverbs<br />

Schniftfes~schn~: fisaqs <strong>in</strong> H<strong>on</strong>or of John &Francis<br />

This is certa<strong>in</strong>ly no place to go <strong>in</strong>to a detailed discussi<strong>on</strong> of adverbs <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese.<br />

What we would like to do <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g is to c<strong>on</strong>centrate <strong>on</strong> some aspects that are of<br />

immediate c<strong>on</strong>cern to our topic at h<strong>and</strong>. Specifically, we would like to take up two<br />

import ant questi<strong>on</strong>s c<strong>on</strong>cern<strong>in</strong>g Ch<strong>in</strong>ese adverbs, namely, (i) the problem of identify<strong>in</strong>g<br />

adverbs <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese; <strong>and</strong>, (ii) the placement of different types of adverbs <strong>in</strong> a multiple<br />

adverbial c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong>.<br />

2.1 The Problem of Identify<strong>in</strong>g Ch<strong>in</strong>ese Adverbs<br />

Just as <strong>in</strong> many other languages, the adverb <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese as a category is an<br />

. extremely ill-def<strong>in</strong>ed cover term for a number of different categories. Tai (1976:393) calls<br />

it "a wastebasket for a variety of l<strong>in</strong>guistic entities which bear different semantic relati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

to different parts of a sentence." This be<strong>in</strong>g the case, it is really difficult to set up criteria<br />

to identify what adverbs are <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese. For <strong>in</strong>stance, Guo (1962) def<strong>in</strong>es an adverb as: "a<br />

c<strong>on</strong>stituent that is placed before a verb or an adjective, but never before a noun to <strong>in</strong>dicate<br />

degree, scope, time, negati<strong>on</strong> etc." Evidently, there is a catch <strong>in</strong> the def<strong>in</strong>iti<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> the form<br />

of "etc.". But even with this vagueness, this def<strong>in</strong>iti<strong>on</strong> excludes many l<strong>in</strong>guistic entities<br />

that other l<strong>in</strong>guists would readily classify as adverbs. Witness (6) <strong>and</strong> (7).<br />

(6) m<strong>in</strong>exian-de, ta bu zhidao zhe-jian shi.<br />

clearly he not know this-CL matter<br />

'Clearly, he was not aware of the matter.'<br />

(7) huaner-huan~-zhan~-zhan~ae ta pale j<strong>in</strong>-lai.<br />

<strong>in</strong>:a:flurry he run-ASP enter-come<br />

'In a flurry, he ran <strong>in</strong> (toward the speaker).'<br />

Thus, m<strong>in</strong>gxian-de 'clearly' <strong>and</strong> huanrr-huang-hane-zhang-de '<strong>in</strong> a flurry' can both<br />

occur before a noun, <strong>and</strong> yet most l<strong>in</strong>guists would agree to assign them to the category of<br />

adverbs.<br />

However, rather than make any attempt to fix up the def<strong>in</strong>iti<strong>on</strong> so that it can cover<br />

all adverbs, which is a task evidently bey<strong>on</strong>d the scope of this secti<strong>on</strong>, we would like to<br />

take up an area which c<strong>on</strong>tributes to the difficulty of def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g adverbs <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese. This<br />

area, which has a great deal to do with the topic of the present paper, c<strong>on</strong>cerns the<br />

ambivalence of some k<strong>in</strong>ds of expressi<strong>on</strong> which occur preverbally.<br />

Certa<strong>in</strong> expressi<strong>on</strong>s <strong>in</strong> English also exhibit this ambivalence, as Ly<strong>on</strong>s (1977:474)<br />

po<strong>in</strong>ts out:<br />

The difference bet ween certa<strong>in</strong> locative adverbials <strong>and</strong> place-referr<strong>in</strong>g<br />

nom<strong>in</strong>als is not, <strong>in</strong> fact, clear-cut <strong>in</strong> all syntactic positi<strong>on</strong>s <strong>in</strong> English.<br />

For example, the dem<strong>on</strong>strative adverbs 'here' <strong>and</strong> 'there' <strong>and</strong> the<br />

dem<strong>on</strong>strative pr<strong>on</strong>ouns 'this' <strong>and</strong> 'that' are equally appropriate as<br />

substitutes for 'this placeV/'that place' <strong>in</strong> an utterance like (This/that<br />

place is where we agreed to meet.'

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!