Essays on Writing and Language in Honor - Sino-Platonic Papers
Essays on Writing and Language in Honor - Sino-Platonic Papers
Essays on Writing and Language in Honor - Sino-Platonic Papers
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
S<strong>in</strong>o-Plat<strong>on</strong>ic <strong>Papers</strong>, 27 (August 3 1, 199 1)<br />
people. whose relati<strong>on</strong>ship to <strong>on</strong>e another was either that of family<br />
member or close friend. Altogether eight <strong>on</strong>e-hour c<strong>on</strong>versati<strong>on</strong>s<br />
from Taipei <strong>and</strong> eight <strong>on</strong>e-hour c<strong>on</strong>versati<strong>on</strong>s from Pek<strong>in</strong>g form the<br />
data base of this study. One c<strong>on</strong>cern which arises <strong>on</strong>ce <strong>on</strong>e decides to<br />
utilize so many <strong>in</strong>dependent sources of natural data is whether or<br />
not such data is c<strong>on</strong>sistent across the board <strong>in</strong> terms of pragmatic<br />
c<strong>on</strong>tent. In other words, do these sixteen c<strong>on</strong>versati<strong>on</strong>s share a<br />
similar sett<strong>in</strong>g, a similar c<strong>on</strong>tent, <strong>and</strong> a similar relati<strong>on</strong>ship am<strong>on</strong>g<br />
each set of participants as <strong>on</strong>e goes from <strong>on</strong>e c<strong>on</strong>versati<strong>on</strong> to<br />
another? In this case the answer to all three c<strong>on</strong>cerns is yes, <strong>and</strong><br />
thus comparis<strong>on</strong>s with<strong>in</strong> the data can be made with a high degree of<br />
c<strong>on</strong>fidence.<br />
In order to underst<strong>and</strong> the significance of the data presented <strong>in</strong><br />
Figures I <strong>and</strong> 2 below, it is necessary to first underst<strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> at least a<br />
rudimentary way what a chi-square analysis <strong>in</strong>dicates. For a more<br />
thorough discussi<strong>on</strong> of this analysis than what is presented here, the<br />
reader may wish to c<strong>on</strong>sult either Butler (1985) or Davis (1990).<br />
Simply speak<strong>in</strong>g, a chi-square analysis can be thought of as a means<br />
of determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g whether the quantitative differences observed for<br />
two or more sets of token counts are <strong>in</strong> fact statistically significant or<br />
not. Look<strong>in</strong>g at Figures 1 <strong>and</strong> 2, <strong>on</strong>e f<strong>in</strong>ds <strong>in</strong>formati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> the actual<br />
number of tokens observed, the expected number of tokens if the<br />
variables of geographical locati<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong> sentence type were<br />
<strong>in</strong>dependent of each other, the chi-square value (a sum of the<br />
differences between the observed <strong>and</strong> expected counts), <strong>and</strong> the<br />
degrees of freedom (a technical term which is difficult to expla<strong>in</strong>, but<br />
which <strong>in</strong>dicates whether the chi-square value is great enough to<br />
signify statistical significance for the data). For the two figures found<br />
below, <strong>on</strong>ly <strong>on</strong>e or two degrees of freedom (df) are observed.<br />
Accord<strong>in</strong>g to st<strong>and</strong>ard statistical practice, for <strong>on</strong>e degree of freedom,<br />
a chi-square value of 3.8414 or greater <strong>in</strong>dicates statistical<br />
significance, while for two degree of freedom, the necessary value is<br />
5.9914 or greater. Therefore we see that the patterns illustrated <strong>in</strong><br />
both of these figures are <strong>in</strong> fact statistically significant.<br />
Figure 1 illustrates the number of tokens of each of the three yes-<br />
no patterns which are found <strong>in</strong> each of the two speech communities<br />
when no speaker presuppositi<strong>on</strong> exists. In each case, expected<br />
counts are given directly below observed counts. For example, <strong>in</strong> the<br />
.