27.02.2013 Views

The Curse of the Wer.. - Site de Thomas - Free

The Curse of the Wer.. - Site de Thomas - Free

The Curse of the Wer.. - Site de Thomas - Free

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

UPRIGHT CITIZENS ON ALL FOURS<br />

large.’ 1 Certainly, in <strong>the</strong> nineteenth century, <strong>the</strong> creative practices that<br />

generated monsters were closely related to <strong>the</strong> imaginative processes<br />

that located corruption in certain parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> community, and <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>de</strong>scription <strong>of</strong> marginalized groups <strong>of</strong>ten employed <strong>the</strong> language <strong>of</strong><br />

monstrosity.<br />

For example, lycanthropy was <strong>of</strong>ten presented as a threat emanating<br />

from <strong>the</strong> un<strong>de</strong>rclasses. <strong>The</strong> <strong>de</strong>piction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se classes in terms <strong>of</strong><br />

an animal physiognomy was not uncommon in nineteenth-century<br />

discourse; Henry Mayhew, for instance, asserted that street people<br />

were notable for a ‘greater <strong>de</strong>velopment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> animal than <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

intellectual or moral nature <strong>of</strong> man … for <strong>the</strong>ir high cheeks and protruding<br />

jaws’. 2 Representations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> werewolf drew from a similar<br />

<strong>de</strong>scriptive vocabulary. In his 1865 monograph on <strong>the</strong> werewolf, Sabine<br />

Baring-Gould characterized Gilles Garnier, a peasant accused <strong>of</strong> lycanthropy<br />

in <strong>the</strong> sixteenth century, as ‘a sombre, ill-looking fellow, who<br />

walked in a stooping attitu<strong>de</strong>, and whose pale face, livid complexion,<br />

and <strong>de</strong>ep-set eyes un<strong>de</strong>r a pair <strong>of</strong> coarse and bushy brows, which<br />

met across <strong>the</strong> forehead, were sufficient to repel anyone from seeking<br />

his acquaintance.’ 3 <strong>The</strong> journalist and essayist Andrew Wynter<br />

paraphrased Baring-Gould’s account in an 1875 article on lycanthropy,<br />

adding ‘<strong>the</strong> story affords a good example <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> class <strong>of</strong> people who<br />

were seized with this horrible epi<strong>de</strong>mic’, to ensure that no one missed<br />

<strong>the</strong> point. 4 Representations <strong>of</strong> lycanthropy were not, however, confined<br />

to visualizations <strong>of</strong> lower-class werewolves in <strong>the</strong> nineteenth century.<br />

Depictions <strong>of</strong> aristocratic lycanthropy drew upon middle-class narratives<br />

about <strong>the</strong> <strong>de</strong>cay <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> nobility in contrast to bourgeois vitality,<br />

as a passage from a novella by M.M. Erckmann-Chatrian illustrates.<br />

Narrated by a middle-class interloper, <strong>the</strong> tale relates <strong>the</strong> tragic curse<br />

<strong>of</strong> a noble family.<br />

[T]he sight that met my eyes ma<strong>de</strong> <strong>the</strong> blood run chill as snow in my veins.<br />

<strong>The</strong> lord <strong>of</strong> Ni<strong>de</strong>ck, crouching on all fours upon his bed, with his arms<br />

bending forward, his head carried low, his eyes glaring with fierce fires,<br />

was uttering loud, protracted howlings!<br />

He was <strong>the</strong> wolf!<br />

That low receding forehead, that sharp-pointed face, that foxy-looking<br />

beard, bristling <strong>of</strong>f both cheeks; <strong>the</strong> long meagre figure, <strong>the</strong> sinewy<br />

45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!