27.02.2013 Views

The Curse of the Wer.. - Site de Thomas - Free

The Curse of the Wer.. - Site de Thomas - Free

The Curse of the Wer.. - Site de Thomas - Free

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

28 THE CURSE OF THE WEREWOLF<br />

his 1873 article by commenting that ‘[t]here is no more important<br />

duty for our reformers than to take care that vice and ignorance do<br />

not produce those were-wolves <strong>of</strong> mo<strong>de</strong>rn civilization who gnash <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

teeth and glare at us from behind prison-bars or <strong>the</strong> grated windows<br />

<strong>of</strong> lunatic asylums.’ 53<br />

<strong>The</strong> language <strong>of</strong> reason and morality, however, <strong>of</strong>ten contrasted glaringly<br />

with <strong>the</strong> same writers’ apparent relish for sensational material.<br />

Charles Dickens gave characteristically perceptive expression to <strong>the</strong>se<br />

contradictions in a letter to his partner regarding <strong>the</strong> editorial policy<br />

<strong>of</strong> Household Words, writing that <strong>the</strong> material <strong>the</strong>y printed should<br />

be ‘“extraordinary”, “romantic”, or “remarkable”, a gui<strong>de</strong> to public<br />

opinion and “as amusing as possible, but all distinctly and boldly going<br />

to what in one’s own view ought to be <strong>the</strong> spirit <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> people and<br />

<strong>the</strong> time”.’ 54 Just as Dickens seemed to propose, sage cautions about<br />

corporeal indulgence or emotional excess were frequently intermingled<br />

with lavish <strong>de</strong>scriptions <strong>of</strong> melodramatic <strong>de</strong>eds or mur<strong>de</strong>rous atrocities.<br />

Young’s moralizing conclusion to his article, for example, conclu<strong>de</strong>s<br />

several columns <strong>of</strong> explicitly <strong>de</strong>scribed abominations, couched in <strong>the</strong><br />

most colourful and emotive language. 55<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r moralists were more doggedly opposed to <strong>the</strong> circulation <strong>of</strong><br />

sensation literature, but even <strong>the</strong>y found <strong>the</strong>mselves resorting to <strong>the</strong><br />

very tropes <strong>the</strong>y sought to discredit. As Ann Cvetkovich notes, use<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> metaphor <strong>of</strong> ‘appetite’ for <strong>the</strong> attraction to sensation was not<br />

uncommon amongst its critics, a representation which suggested that<br />

‘<strong>the</strong> sensation novel is <strong>de</strong>plorable because it reduces its rea<strong>de</strong>rs to <strong>the</strong><br />

condition <strong>of</strong> animals who are driven by instincts.’ 56 Echoes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> type<br />

<strong>of</strong> monstrosity embodied by <strong>the</strong> werewolf consequently found <strong>the</strong>ir way<br />

into characterizations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> rea<strong>de</strong>rs <strong>of</strong> sensation literature, as in H.L.<br />

Mansel’s ‘Sensation Novels’ (1863), published in Quarterly Review,<br />

which argued that ‘[t]here is something unspeakably disgusting in this<br />

ravenous appetite for carrion, this vulture-like instinct which smells<br />

out <strong>the</strong> newest mass <strong>of</strong> social corruption, and hurries to <strong>de</strong>vour <strong>the</strong><br />

loathsome dainty before <strong>the</strong> scent has evaporated.’ 57 Imagery <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

werewolf was even more pronounced in J. Greenwood’s characterization<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> writer or publisher <strong>of</strong> sensation literature.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!