27.02.2013 Views

The Curse of the Wer.. - Site de Thomas - Free

The Curse of the Wer.. - Site de Thomas - Free

The Curse of the Wer.. - Site de Thomas - Free

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

50 THE CURSE OF THE WEREWOLF<br />

in drinking a dog laps, whereas a wolf sucks, and in biting <strong>the</strong> wolf gives<br />

a rapid succession <strong>of</strong> vicious snaps, instead <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> firm, retaining hold<br />

which generally characterizes <strong>the</strong> bite <strong>of</strong> a healthy dog. <strong>The</strong> character<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bark also differs greatly, <strong>the</strong> honest dog-bark being replaced by a<br />

short snapping, while <strong>the</strong> wolf voice is chiefly exerted in producing dismal<br />

howls. As regards external appearance … <strong>the</strong> cruel treacherous expression<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> obliquely-set eyes betrays how different is <strong>the</strong> wolf-spirit from that<br />

which looks out through <strong>the</strong> kind true eyes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> faithful dog. 20<br />

Nineteenth-century representations <strong>of</strong> lycanthropy drew from such<br />

characterizations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> wolf, so that whenever a werewolf was discovered<br />

in its lupine form, it was <strong>de</strong>scribed in similar terms. G.W.M.<br />

Reynolds’s Wagner <strong>the</strong> Wehr-Wolf, for example, is variously <strong>de</strong>scribed<br />

as a ‘ferocious’ or ‘infuriate’ monster, a ‘monstrous’ wolf <strong>of</strong> ‘appalling<br />

ferocity’ and as ‘<strong>the</strong> <strong>de</strong>stroyer’. 21 Similarly, <strong>the</strong> she-wolf in Campbell’s<br />

story ‘has gleaming tusks and a pair <strong>of</strong> yellow eyes that blazed with<br />

lurid fire’. 22<br />

As all <strong>the</strong>se examples from narratives about lycanthropy <strong>de</strong>monstrate,<br />

<strong>the</strong> werewolf, like o<strong>the</strong>r monsters, embodied a composite<br />

O<strong>the</strong>rness which gave expression to anxieties about working-class<br />

<strong>de</strong>generacy, aristocratic <strong>de</strong>ca<strong>de</strong>nce, racial atavism, women’s corporeality<br />

and sexuality, and <strong>the</strong> human relationship to <strong>the</strong> animal world.<br />

<strong>The</strong> physical <strong>de</strong>fects or stigmata <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> werewolf’s human incarnation<br />

suggested <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> interior beast, much as bumps on <strong>the</strong><br />

skull or facial characteristics were interpreted by phrenologists as<br />

evi<strong>de</strong>nce <strong>of</strong> interior characteristics and ten<strong>de</strong>ncies. In<strong>de</strong>ed, <strong>the</strong> process<br />

by which such <strong>de</strong>scriptions were drawn was satirized as early as 1855<br />

by Dudley Costello, in his short story ‘Lycanthropy in London; Or, <strong>the</strong><br />

Wehr-Wolf <strong>of</strong> Wilton-Crescent’, in which Miss A<strong>de</strong>la Cunninghame<br />

relies upon ‘her fatal skill in physiognomy’ to assess <strong>the</strong> character <strong>of</strong><br />

her friend’s new husband, Mr Fitz-Poodle. 23 ‘His sharp nose, his small<br />

eyes, his sandy eyebrows, his large teeth, his wiry hair, and his yellow<br />

whiskers, were severally objects <strong>of</strong> dislike to Miss Cunninghame’, to<br />

<strong>the</strong> extent that she says to herself ‘Very like a wolf! … I must observe<br />

his habits.’ 24 A<strong>de</strong>la’s suspicions that Mr Fitz-Poodle is a werewolf are<br />

subsequently confirmed when she notes that he consumed his food

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!