Literature, Principally Belletristic - University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Literature, Principally Belletristic - University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Literature, Principally Belletristic - University of Tennessee, Knoxville
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
· <strong>Literature</strong>, <strong>Principally</strong> <strong>Belletristic</strong> .<br />
markedly colonial, and the butts <strong>of</strong> his satire are, like those <strong>of</strong> Samuel<br />
Butler in Hudibras, the Puritans who lived around him, in his case significantly<br />
the American variety. He had already participated in the Maryland<br />
Proprietary-Puritan pamphlet warfare <strong>of</strong> the r650s when he came to<br />
write this history-description promotion piece, by which he is best remembered.<br />
His earlier Hammond vs Heamans (London, [r655}) is one <strong>of</strong><br />
the most effective vitriolic partisan tracts <strong>of</strong> seventeenth-century America,<br />
and its effectiveness may have inspired him to write the milder and quite<br />
different though kindred Leah and Rachel.<br />
Leah and Rachel is genuinely American, Moses Coit Tyler and others<br />
have thought, because <strong>of</strong> its colloquialisms and specifically American subject<br />
matter and presentation <strong>of</strong> peculiarly colonial problems and situations.<br />
The butts <strong>of</strong> Hammond's ridicule are earlier "lying" pamphleteers on the<br />
Chesapeake colony such as William Bullock (r649 ), the roaring tavern<br />
frequenters among the dissolute clergy from England who were compelled<br />
to depart, the London human beasts <strong>of</strong> burden too timid or stupid<br />
to attempt a better living in America, and <strong>of</strong> course the Chesapeake<br />
Puritan communities and individuals. But the satiric quality should not<br />
be overstressed, for Hammond's general tone is optimistic and goodnatured.64<br />
Seventeenth-century Maryland, and southern colonial writing for that<br />
matter, is well represented, possibly best represented, in George Alsop's A<br />
Character <strong>of</strong> the Province <strong>of</strong> Mary-Land (London, r666), some <strong>of</strong> the<br />
serious verses from which have been noted above. Though allegedly intended<br />
like Hammond's book as promotion, its tone and impression are<br />
those <strong>of</strong> an exercise in wit and satire, in both its prose and its verse. Its<br />
language is not nearly so plain as Hammond's. In fact, Alsop's style is<br />
baroque or euphuistic, a belated example <strong>of</strong> a popular Jacobean form<br />
<strong>of</strong> writing from the earlier seventeenth century. But with the elaborate low<br />
style <strong>of</strong> Thomas Nashe <strong>of</strong> an earlier period are combined Restoration<br />
frankness about sex, and an elaborate word-play in puns, colloquialisms,<br />
and folk sayings that might have had earlier or contemporary models.<br />
The London-born Alsop had served an apprenticeship in England and<br />
a four-years indenture in Maryland (probably as a clerk) before he returned<br />
to Great Britain and wrote ostensibly at Lord Baltimore's request<br />
this piece aimed to support the Proprietorship. Even more than Hammond,<br />
Alsop was an ardent royalist, and like Hammond he was an<br />
orthodox Anglican. Alsop was a free man by r662 and was still in Maryland<br />
in 1663 and probably in r664. A Character is certainly the most curious<br />
and delightful <strong>of</strong> all seventeenth-century promotion tracts. He called<br />
it "A Character" surely in the contemporary sense <strong>of</strong> the verbal portrait,<br />
or abstract character sketch, normally satiric (see the later William Byrd<br />
r349