29.03.2013 Views

Literature, Principally Belletristic - University of Tennessee, Knoxville

Literature, Principally Belletristic - University of Tennessee, Knoxville

Literature, Principally Belletristic - University of Tennessee, Knoxville

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

· Literatttre, <strong>Principally</strong> <strong>Belletristic</strong> .<br />

the Knickerbocker History and even the Satyricon perhaps more than<br />

Addison and Steele. The "Ephesian Matron" tale from Petronius (which<br />

Byrd was to translate ) is incorporated into "Monitor NO. 9," believed by<br />

some critics to be the best <strong>of</strong> the series. At least two other essays also refer<br />

to the Satyricon.<br />

Most <strong>of</strong> the earlier extant numbers are lighthearted satire and may have<br />

been composed by one author, but a group including numbers 10, 12, 16,<br />

18, 20, and 21 seem to be composed in a more serious vein. They instruct<br />

the reader in music appreciation, the difference between French and Italian<br />

opera, "social discord" in relation to human nature, the evils <strong>of</strong> scandalmongering,<br />

and the popular topic "Good Nature." Stylistic differences<br />

here from most <strong>of</strong> the more satirical pieces point to at least dual authorship,<br />

perhaps multiple authorship. Parks was himself perhaps a principal author,<br />

and several essays may have been the work <strong>of</strong> a group <strong>of</strong> William and Mary<br />

students. One would not be too surprised if it were one day discovered<br />

that certain <strong>of</strong> the better essays, such as 6 and 9, may have been the work<br />

<strong>of</strong> college faculty members or <strong>of</strong> William Byrd II, Sir John Randolph, or<br />

another <strong>of</strong> the several sophisticated Virginians <strong>of</strong> talent resident in or frequent<br />

visitors to the little capital. But early in February 1736/7 the authorauthors<br />

closed shop, and the "Monitor" was no more. Perhaps they did<br />

simply run out <strong>of</strong> material, as a perceptive critic suggests, because there<br />

was a dearth <strong>of</strong> complexity in the society which was being mirrored. It<br />

seems more probable that someone, perhaps the publisher, thought the<br />

series had run long enough, or that a busy writer or writers had more important<br />

matters to occupy his or their time. If a man such as William Byrd<br />

or Randolph was an author, his interest would almost certainly have<br />

flagged after he had composed a few amusing pieces.<br />

That the "Monitor" was in the British periodical-essay tradition does<br />

not mean that it was entirely derivative. Throughout both Great Britain<br />

and America for more than a century after the Tatler and Spectator their<br />

form and types <strong>of</strong> personae were employed in creating some delightfully<br />

original essays in language and spirit. The Monitor was urbane, well educated<br />

in the classics, and prone at times to compare provincial with British<br />

society. Irony, burlesque, and all the lighter forms <strong>of</strong> satire-invective appears<br />

to be absent-are used with some skill. Perhaps the author did discover<br />

early, however, the inappropriateness <strong>of</strong> the facets <strong>of</strong> American<br />

social life to the Anglo-European comedy <strong>of</strong> manners. When Byrd did make<br />

enduring comic art <strong>of</strong> New World materials, he had turned to new<br />

subjects-the frontier and the frontiersman and the pastoral-agrarian<br />

world <strong>of</strong> his own plantation.77<br />

Satire in the Virginia Gazette by no means ended with the "Monitor."<br />

Facetious, semi-facetious, mocking, burlesquing verse and prose appear

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!