Literature, Principally Belletristic - University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Literature, Principally Belletristic - University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Literature, Principally Belletristic - University of Tennessee, Knoxville
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
· Literatttre, <strong>Principally</strong> <strong>Belletristic</strong> .<br />
the Knickerbocker History and even the Satyricon perhaps more than<br />
Addison and Steele. The "Ephesian Matron" tale from Petronius (which<br />
Byrd was to translate ) is incorporated into "Monitor NO. 9," believed by<br />
some critics to be the best <strong>of</strong> the series. At least two other essays also refer<br />
to the Satyricon.<br />
Most <strong>of</strong> the earlier extant numbers are lighthearted satire and may have<br />
been composed by one author, but a group including numbers 10, 12, 16,<br />
18, 20, and 21 seem to be composed in a more serious vein. They instruct<br />
the reader in music appreciation, the difference between French and Italian<br />
opera, "social discord" in relation to human nature, the evils <strong>of</strong> scandalmongering,<br />
and the popular topic "Good Nature." Stylistic differences<br />
here from most <strong>of</strong> the more satirical pieces point to at least dual authorship,<br />
perhaps multiple authorship. Parks was himself perhaps a principal author,<br />
and several essays may have been the work <strong>of</strong> a group <strong>of</strong> William and Mary<br />
students. One would not be too surprised if it were one day discovered<br />
that certain <strong>of</strong> the better essays, such as 6 and 9, may have been the work<br />
<strong>of</strong> college faculty members or <strong>of</strong> William Byrd II, Sir John Randolph, or<br />
another <strong>of</strong> the several sophisticated Virginians <strong>of</strong> talent resident in or frequent<br />
visitors to the little capital. But early in February 1736/7 the authorauthors<br />
closed shop, and the "Monitor" was no more. Perhaps they did<br />
simply run out <strong>of</strong> material, as a perceptive critic suggests, because there<br />
was a dearth <strong>of</strong> complexity in the society which was being mirrored. It<br />
seems more probable that someone, perhaps the publisher, thought the<br />
series had run long enough, or that a busy writer or writers had more important<br />
matters to occupy his or their time. If a man such as William Byrd<br />
or Randolph was an author, his interest would almost certainly have<br />
flagged after he had composed a few amusing pieces.<br />
That the "Monitor" was in the British periodical-essay tradition does<br />
not mean that it was entirely derivative. Throughout both Great Britain<br />
and America for more than a century after the Tatler and Spectator their<br />
form and types <strong>of</strong> personae were employed in creating some delightfully<br />
original essays in language and spirit. The Monitor was urbane, well educated<br />
in the classics, and prone at times to compare provincial with British<br />
society. Irony, burlesque, and all the lighter forms <strong>of</strong> satire-invective appears<br />
to be absent-are used with some skill. Perhaps the author did discover<br />
early, however, the inappropriateness <strong>of</strong> the facets <strong>of</strong> American<br />
social life to the Anglo-European comedy <strong>of</strong> manners. When Byrd did make<br />
enduring comic art <strong>of</strong> New World materials, he had turned to new<br />
subjects-the frontier and the frontiersman and the pastoral-agrarian<br />
world <strong>of</strong> his own plantation.77<br />
Satire in the Virginia Gazette by no means ended with the "Monitor."<br />
Facetious, semi-facetious, mocking, burlesquing verse and prose appear