05.04.2013 Views

Book 8 - Parliament of Victoria

Book 8 - Parliament of Victoria

Book 8 - Parliament of Victoria

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

GOVERNMENT: ELECTION COMMITMENTS<br />

Wednesday, 1 June 2011 COUNCIL 1627<br />

No-one really believes Labor, because in government<br />

all it did was try to spin its way out <strong>of</strong> doing nothing. In<br />

effect it has been caught. One <strong>of</strong> the greatest<br />

head-in-the-sand tricks on the part <strong>of</strong> the previous<br />

Labor government was what it did to the health sector<br />

in relation to waiting lists. In the first instance the<br />

waiting lists in the public domain were bad enough, but<br />

this is the first government that has ever meticulously,<br />

deliberately and deceitfully invented the concept <strong>of</strong><br />

hidden waiting lists — that is, waiting lists that people<br />

go on before they go onto a waiting list.<br />

We have the numbers. Thousands <strong>of</strong> people in Bendigo<br />

are on the outpatient waiting list. They do not even<br />

have the opportunity to go and see a surgeon in order to<br />

get onto an <strong>of</strong>ficial waiting list. Up to 2000 people will<br />

wait on another waiting list. The Leader <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Opposition, Daniel Andrews, who was the Minister for<br />

Health at the time, oversaw a situation whereby the use<br />

<strong>of</strong> outpatient waiting lists and all <strong>of</strong> the other hidden<br />

waiting lists in effect meant that the people <strong>of</strong> <strong>Victoria</strong><br />

were never really sure <strong>of</strong> the extent <strong>of</strong> waiting list<br />

numbers in the public health system. The government<br />

<strong>of</strong> those opposite oversaw that deceit, and it refused to<br />

even acknowledge that it had created a set <strong>of</strong> hidden<br />

waiting lists.<br />

Further accentuating that problem was the issue <strong>of</strong><br />

ambulance ramping — that is, ambulances forced to<br />

line up on ramps at the back <strong>of</strong> hospital emergency<br />

departments. Again when we were in opposition the<br />

leadership came from David Davis, who said, ‘We<br />

cannot fix the problem overnight, but we will publish<br />

the extent <strong>of</strong> ramping. We will put it on the website if<br />

ambulances are forced to go on bypass mode or forced<br />

to park one behind the other’.<br />

In Bendigo we quite <strong>of</strong>ten see up to eight or nine<br />

ambulances at the back <strong>of</strong> a hospital, trying to get their<br />

patients unloaded and into the system, because they do<br />

not have the opportunity to go on bypass. At least we<br />

have identified this issue. We have clearly stated in an<br />

open and transparent manner that we will effectively<br />

highlight and publish the extent <strong>of</strong> ramping so that<br />

everybody is clear about the extent <strong>of</strong> this problem, and<br />

then with the influx <strong>of</strong> 300 additional paramedics we<br />

are putting into the system we will work out ways to<br />

alleviate the problem.<br />

It is a bit rich for Mr Jennings, as a former minister, to<br />

come into this house and say, ‘The extra $102 million<br />

you have set aside in your budget for the Bendigo<br />

hospital redevelopment is actually not in this year’s<br />

budget; it is not even in the forward estimates’. We are<br />

going to spend an extra $102 million to build the<br />

hospital at a total cost <strong>of</strong> $632 million, as opposed to<br />

Labor’s $512 million — sorry, $530 million; you have<br />

to add up the contributions over various years to get the<br />

final sums.<br />

Hon. M. P. Pakula interjected.<br />

Mr DRUM — Mr Pakula, members <strong>of</strong> the<br />

opposition might have a shred <strong>of</strong> credibility if they once<br />

thanked the coalition for, in opposition, committing to<br />

$632 million for the hospital. Local members for the<br />

seats <strong>of</strong> Bendigo East and Bendigo West in the other<br />

place are effectively calling for the government to scrap<br />

the additional $102 million and build a cheaper hospital<br />

for the city <strong>of</strong> Bendigo. If Mr Pakula thinks that is good<br />

representation <strong>of</strong> Bendigo, then he is different from<br />

most members <strong>of</strong> <strong>Parliament</strong>. The two members <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Parliament</strong> representing Bendigo are the only members<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Parliament</strong> to ever advocate for $102 million to leave<br />

their electorates and be spent elsewhere.<br />

If Mr Pakula thinks that is good representation, he<br />

should stick with Jacinta Allan and Maree Edwards, the<br />

members for Bendigo East and Bendigo West in the<br />

other place, because that is exactly what they are doing.<br />

It is unbelievable — a set <strong>of</strong> Laborites, believing in<br />

what Labor does, believing that Labor is<br />

unquestionable and believing that nobody else could<br />

ever build anything to rival the brilliance <strong>of</strong> the former<br />

Labor government. It is so arrogant. The process<br />

Mr Pakula’s government went through in relation to<br />

that Bendigo project beggars belief.<br />

I move on to schools. Labor members have effectively<br />

said, ‘We have an issue with a lack <strong>of</strong> school funding’.<br />

Again this is quite laughable. All the members on the<br />

government benches are being inundated by principals<br />

and school council presidents coming to us and in effect<br />

saying that prior to the last election they were led to<br />

believe that they were going to get a new school or a<br />

new hall or an extension to their science lab or a new<br />

library — money for this or that — —<br />

Hon. M. P. Pakula — Because they were election<br />

commitments.<br />

Mr DRUM — No, Mr Pakula, they were not<br />

election commitments; they were just winks and nods.<br />

The former government said, ‘Keep quiet, get your<br />

merge done and we will come good with the money’,<br />

but there was nothing at all in the forward estimates.<br />

Hon. M. P. Pakula — Because they were election<br />

commitments; do you understand the difference?<br />

Mr DRUM — No, they were not election<br />

commitments, Mr Pakula; they were simply winks and<br />

nods. Schools throughout the system have gone ahead

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!