Book 8 - Parliament of Victoria
Book 8 - Parliament of Victoria
Book 8 - Parliament of Victoria
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
GOVERNMENT: ELECTION COMMITMENTS<br />
Wednesday, 1 June 2011 COUNCIL 1627<br />
No-one really believes Labor, because in government<br />
all it did was try to spin its way out <strong>of</strong> doing nothing. In<br />
effect it has been caught. One <strong>of</strong> the greatest<br />
head-in-the-sand tricks on the part <strong>of</strong> the previous<br />
Labor government was what it did to the health sector<br />
in relation to waiting lists. In the first instance the<br />
waiting lists in the public domain were bad enough, but<br />
this is the first government that has ever meticulously,<br />
deliberately and deceitfully invented the concept <strong>of</strong><br />
hidden waiting lists — that is, waiting lists that people<br />
go on before they go onto a waiting list.<br />
We have the numbers. Thousands <strong>of</strong> people in Bendigo<br />
are on the outpatient waiting list. They do not even<br />
have the opportunity to go and see a surgeon in order to<br />
get onto an <strong>of</strong>ficial waiting list. Up to 2000 people will<br />
wait on another waiting list. The Leader <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Opposition, Daniel Andrews, who was the Minister for<br />
Health at the time, oversaw a situation whereby the use<br />
<strong>of</strong> outpatient waiting lists and all <strong>of</strong> the other hidden<br />
waiting lists in effect meant that the people <strong>of</strong> <strong>Victoria</strong><br />
were never really sure <strong>of</strong> the extent <strong>of</strong> waiting list<br />
numbers in the public health system. The government<br />
<strong>of</strong> those opposite oversaw that deceit, and it refused to<br />
even acknowledge that it had created a set <strong>of</strong> hidden<br />
waiting lists.<br />
Further accentuating that problem was the issue <strong>of</strong><br />
ambulance ramping — that is, ambulances forced to<br />
line up on ramps at the back <strong>of</strong> hospital emergency<br />
departments. Again when we were in opposition the<br />
leadership came from David Davis, who said, ‘We<br />
cannot fix the problem overnight, but we will publish<br />
the extent <strong>of</strong> ramping. We will put it on the website if<br />
ambulances are forced to go on bypass mode or forced<br />
to park one behind the other’.<br />
In Bendigo we quite <strong>of</strong>ten see up to eight or nine<br />
ambulances at the back <strong>of</strong> a hospital, trying to get their<br />
patients unloaded and into the system, because they do<br />
not have the opportunity to go on bypass. At least we<br />
have identified this issue. We have clearly stated in an<br />
open and transparent manner that we will effectively<br />
highlight and publish the extent <strong>of</strong> ramping so that<br />
everybody is clear about the extent <strong>of</strong> this problem, and<br />
then with the influx <strong>of</strong> 300 additional paramedics we<br />
are putting into the system we will work out ways to<br />
alleviate the problem.<br />
It is a bit rich for Mr Jennings, as a former minister, to<br />
come into this house and say, ‘The extra $102 million<br />
you have set aside in your budget for the Bendigo<br />
hospital redevelopment is actually not in this year’s<br />
budget; it is not even in the forward estimates’. We are<br />
going to spend an extra $102 million to build the<br />
hospital at a total cost <strong>of</strong> $632 million, as opposed to<br />
Labor’s $512 million — sorry, $530 million; you have<br />
to add up the contributions over various years to get the<br />
final sums.<br />
Hon. M. P. Pakula interjected.<br />
Mr DRUM — Mr Pakula, members <strong>of</strong> the<br />
opposition might have a shred <strong>of</strong> credibility if they once<br />
thanked the coalition for, in opposition, committing to<br />
$632 million for the hospital. Local members for the<br />
seats <strong>of</strong> Bendigo East and Bendigo West in the other<br />
place are effectively calling for the government to scrap<br />
the additional $102 million and build a cheaper hospital<br />
for the city <strong>of</strong> Bendigo. If Mr Pakula thinks that is good<br />
representation <strong>of</strong> Bendigo, then he is different from<br />
most members <strong>of</strong> <strong>Parliament</strong>. The two members <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>Parliament</strong> representing Bendigo are the only members<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>Parliament</strong> to ever advocate for $102 million to leave<br />
their electorates and be spent elsewhere.<br />
If Mr Pakula thinks that is good representation, he<br />
should stick with Jacinta Allan and Maree Edwards, the<br />
members for Bendigo East and Bendigo West in the<br />
other place, because that is exactly what they are doing.<br />
It is unbelievable — a set <strong>of</strong> Laborites, believing in<br />
what Labor does, believing that Labor is<br />
unquestionable and believing that nobody else could<br />
ever build anything to rival the brilliance <strong>of</strong> the former<br />
Labor government. It is so arrogant. The process<br />
Mr Pakula’s government went through in relation to<br />
that Bendigo project beggars belief.<br />
I move on to schools. Labor members have effectively<br />
said, ‘We have an issue with a lack <strong>of</strong> school funding’.<br />
Again this is quite laughable. All the members on the<br />
government benches are being inundated by principals<br />
and school council presidents coming to us and in effect<br />
saying that prior to the last election they were led to<br />
believe that they were going to get a new school or a<br />
new hall or an extension to their science lab or a new<br />
library — money for this or that — —<br />
Hon. M. P. Pakula — Because they were election<br />
commitments.<br />
Mr DRUM — No, Mr Pakula, they were not<br />
election commitments; they were just winks and nods.<br />
The former government said, ‘Keep quiet, get your<br />
merge done and we will come good with the money’,<br />
but there was nothing at all in the forward estimates.<br />
Hon. M. P. Pakula — Because they were election<br />
commitments; do you understand the difference?<br />
Mr DRUM — No, they were not election<br />
commitments, Mr Pakula; they were simply winks and<br />
nods. Schools throughout the system have gone ahead