05.04.2013 Views

Book 8 - Parliament of Victoria

Book 8 - Parliament of Victoria

Book 8 - Parliament of Victoria

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PUBLIC HOLIDAYS AMENDMENT BILL 2011<br />

1682 COUNCIL Thursday, 2 June 2011<br />

I suspect that is a significant clause in that agreement<br />

for some good reason that the people working at<br />

Luv-a-Duck will understand better than I do. There are<br />

also some arrangements in the EBA about union picnic<br />

day and circumstances in which Christmas Day,<br />

Australia Day or New Year’s Day occurs on a Saturday<br />

or Sunday, when they would be observed on the<br />

following Monday.<br />

Clause 32.3 <strong>of</strong> the agreement states:<br />

Where in a state, territory or locality, public holidays are<br />

declared or prescribed on days other than those set out in 32.1<br />

and 32.2 above —<br />

that is, the previous list <strong>of</strong> holidays —<br />

those days shall constitute additional holidays for the purpose<br />

<strong>of</strong> this agreement.<br />

That is just one example from one <strong>of</strong> the municipalities<br />

that will be affected by this legislation and by split<br />

arrangements for public holidays. I invite government<br />

members to respond by thinking about how this<br />

legislation will impact on the many and varied<br />

industrial agreements in workplaces right across<br />

<strong>Victoria</strong>.<br />

Murray Goulburn Co-operative is another large<br />

employer that has many people employed at a number<br />

<strong>of</strong> locations in regional <strong>Victoria</strong>. That company’s<br />

agreement provides for Melbourne Cup Day. I urge<br />

government members to think about the practical<br />

impact <strong>of</strong> this legislation. The examples I have used are<br />

only a couple that I grabbed because they raise a<br />

number <strong>of</strong> different questions.<br />

Mr Somyurek will be moving an amendment during the<br />

course <strong>of</strong> this debate. I will leave it to him to speak<br />

about his amendment in more detail. However, in the<br />

context <strong>of</strong> the debate on the shop trading legislation,<br />

opposition members sought to move an amendment to<br />

the Public Holidays Act 1993 to provide that Easter<br />

Sunday is a public holiday, given that the actions <strong>of</strong> the<br />

government not so long ago mean it is now a retail<br />

trading day whereas it was not before.<br />

Easter Sunday is caught in this funny place where it is<br />

adjacent to a couple <strong>of</strong> public holidays, but it is not a<br />

public holiday, which affects the way in which people<br />

are paid if they are required to work in a shop on Easter<br />

Sunday. Government members told us at the time that it<br />

was not the shop trading legislation that we should be<br />

seeking to amend, we needed an amendment to the<br />

public holidays legislation. Here we are talking about<br />

the Public Holidays Act 1993, so we will take the<br />

opportunity to make that case again, and Mr Somyurek<br />

will speak about that in a little more detail.<br />

The opposition will not be opposing the second reading<br />

<strong>of</strong> this legislation, although we are keen to discuss some<br />

<strong>of</strong> its practical applications in the committee stage. I<br />

will finish by saying that I spoke to a number <strong>of</strong> local<br />

councils that were affected by the legislation in 2008<br />

but were also involved in discussions around creating<br />

more flexible and responsive arrangements in 2010.<br />

The feedback I have received — I certainly did not<br />

speak to them all, but I did speak to a number <strong>of</strong><br />

them — was that they would be okay with this<br />

legislation if it did not cause any tangible changes to the<br />

arrangements that were in place last year. Flexibility<br />

and discretion are important. As I said, I am interested<br />

in how we apply the split holiday notion and the<br />

part-shire notion in combination, and I am sure that the<br />

minister who will be at the table when we are in<br />

committee will be able to answer some <strong>of</strong> those<br />

questions in a little more detail. I am grateful for the<br />

opportunity to speak on this bill. Public holidays are<br />

very important to a lot <strong>of</strong> people, and it is vital that we<br />

get the legislation right.<br />

Ms PENNICUIK (Southern Metropolitan) — The<br />

Public Holidays Amendment Bill 2011 is before us to<br />

clarify arrangements for local councils declaring public<br />

holidays in lieu <strong>of</strong> Melbourne Cup Day. It could be<br />

argued that we should not be having a public holiday<br />

for a horse race in Melbourne, or indeed in any regional<br />

area, but I suppose that is a wider debate. Other people<br />

may want to have yet another debate about whether we<br />

should have a holiday to mark the monarch’s<br />

birthday — we could go on and have a discussion about<br />

the reasons for all our public holidays. However, there<br />

has been debate in the community over a long time<br />

about whether there should be a public holiday for a<br />

horse race.<br />

Mr P. Davis — Or any public holidays.<br />

Ms PENNICUIK — Mr Davis says, ‘Or any public<br />

holidays’. I note that 11 public holidays are gazetted in<br />

the state <strong>of</strong> <strong>Victoria</strong>. It is interesting that in years past,<br />

because <strong>of</strong> the non-observance <strong>of</strong> Melbourne Cup Day<br />

in regional areas, metropolitan people were getting their<br />

11 public holidays whereas regional people were<br />

getting only 10 in many cases. Prior to 2008 the Public<br />

Holidays Act 1993 gave councils the powers to gazette<br />

one full day or two half-day public holidays and declare<br />

its applicability either for all or part <strong>of</strong> the municipality.<br />

The intention <strong>of</strong> those provisions was to accommodate<br />

local race days and agricultural show days in each local<br />

council area or part there<strong>of</strong> each year.<br />

The changes that were made in the 2008 amendment<br />

bill were argued for on the basis that arrangements for

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!