Book 8 - Parliament of Victoria
Book 8 - Parliament of Victoria
Book 8 - Parliament of Victoria
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
GOVERNMENT: ELECTION COMMITMENTS<br />
1602 COUNCIL Wednesday, 1 June 2011<br />
Mr DRUM — The previous Labor government<br />
thought it might give the sector time to adjust. In order<br />
to keep the program going the state government<br />
continued funding until 30 June this year. Members <strong>of</strong><br />
the opposition should acknowledge that at that stage the<br />
extension was only for 12 months.<br />
Upon coming to government the coalition further<br />
extended this program until the end <strong>of</strong> this calendar<br />
year. The state government cannot be expected to fund<br />
areas <strong>of</strong> federal government responsibility. In the words<br />
<strong>of</strong> the former Treasurer, Mr John Lenders, it is about<br />
time some members <strong>of</strong> the Labor Party in this house<br />
picked up the phone and rang their Labor Party<br />
colleagues. Kate Ellis, the federal Minister for<br />
Employment Participation and Childcare, is the<br />
responsible minister. She has not bothered returning<br />
correspondence from our Minister for Children and<br />
Early Childhood Development, so why is it that the<br />
members <strong>of</strong> the Labor Party in this house, especially<br />
Jenny Mikakos, will not pick up the phone and call<br />
their Canberra colleagues, Labor to Labor, like we were<br />
instructed to do, and get this funding reinstated?<br />
GOVERNMENT: ELECTION<br />
COMMITMENTS<br />
Debate resumed from 6 April; motion <strong>of</strong><br />
Mr VINEY (Eastern <strong>Victoria</strong>):<br />
That this house congratulates the Liberal-National coalition<br />
parties on their election to government and calls on the<br />
Leader <strong>of</strong> the Government to —<br />
(1) give a commitment to the house that the government<br />
will honour all <strong>of</strong> its election commitments in full;<br />
(2) make available to the house the full cost <strong>of</strong> each election<br />
commitment made by the coalition as advised by the<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Treasury and Finance; and<br />
(3) advise the house the means by which these costs will be<br />
met including:<br />
(a) any proposed revenue-raising measures;<br />
(b) any program and service cuts.<br />
Ms BROAD (Northern <strong>Victoria</strong>) — Given the time<br />
that has elapsed since the house last considered this<br />
question it is worth taking a moment to remind<br />
members <strong>of</strong> the full text <strong>of</strong> the motion that is now back<br />
before the house. The motion moved by Mr Viney is:<br />
That this house congratulates the Liberal-National coalition<br />
parties on their election to government and calls on the<br />
Leader <strong>of</strong> the Government to —<br />
(1) give a commitment to the house that the government<br />
will honour all <strong>of</strong> its election commitments in full;<br />
(2) make available to the house the full cost <strong>of</strong> each election<br />
commitment made by the coalition as advised by the<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Treasury and Finance; and<br />
(3) advise the house the means by which these costs will be<br />
met including:<br />
(a) any proposed revenue-raising measures;<br />
(b) any program and service cuts.<br />
That was moved on 6 April 2011 prior to the state<br />
budget. Members <strong>of</strong> the Labor opposition acknowledge<br />
in this motion that we accept that the Liberal-Nationals<br />
coalition is now in government, and it is our job to hold<br />
the government to account for the commitments it<br />
made to all <strong>Victoria</strong>ns at last year’s election. It is a task<br />
that we have taken up with alacrity.<br />
We believe the government needs to deliver on and<br />
honour all its election commitments in full. Members<br />
may recall that at the time <strong>of</strong> the state election the<br />
Liberal and National parties refused to make available<br />
to <strong>Victoria</strong>ns the costings by the Department <strong>of</strong><br />
Treasury and Finance. The Liberal and National parties<br />
instead obtained costings from a firm with which they<br />
were on very good terms and declined to make the<br />
details <strong>of</strong> those costings available either.<br />
Following the election the Liberal-Nationals coalition<br />
government declined to make available the costings that<br />
Treasury and Finance always prepares in advance <strong>of</strong> an<br />
election which outline the cost <strong>of</strong> implementing the<br />
policies taken to the election by the parties. To that end<br />
<strong>Victoria</strong>ns were well and truly in the dark as to what the<br />
costings revealed. For that reason the Labor opposition,<br />
through this motion, calls for the government, in the<br />
interests <strong>of</strong> openness, transparency and accountability<br />
to the <strong>Parliament</strong> and to <strong>Victoria</strong>ns, to bring forward<br />
that information, which to this day the Liberal and<br />
National parties refuse to make available. In speaking<br />
to the motion moved by Mr Viney I reiterate calls from<br />
the Labor opposition for that information to be made<br />
available to the <strong>Parliament</strong> and to all <strong>Victoria</strong>ns.<br />
The motion also requires the Liberal-Nationals<br />
coalition government to advise the house <strong>of</strong> the means<br />
by which the costs <strong>of</strong> implementing its election<br />
commitments will be met, including proposed<br />
revenue-raising measures and any program and service<br />
cuts.<br />
It is challenging indeed to assess that information<br />
against the costings <strong>of</strong> election commitments when the<br />
government continues to refuse to make that<br />
information available. Nonetheless, since the election<br />
some things have become clear regardless <strong>of</strong> the fact<br />
that the government refuses to make that information