Book 8 - Parliament of Victoria
Book 8 - Parliament of Victoria
Book 8 - Parliament of Victoria
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE<br />
1736 COUNCIL Thursday, 2 June 2011<br />
This bill will also deliver this government’s election promise<br />
to increase stamp duty relief for eligible pensioners by<br />
extending the threshold for the pensioner concession from<br />
$440 000 to $750 000 and making the concession available to<br />
self-funded retirees who hold a commonwealth seniors health<br />
card.<br />
As their lifestyle and circumstances change, older <strong>Victoria</strong>ns<br />
may wish to downsize their homes. This measure will help<br />
relieve some <strong>of</strong> the financial burden felt by older <strong>Victoria</strong>ns<br />
and ensure stamp duty is not a disincentive to seniors<br />
considering downsizing. Extending this concession to<br />
self-funded retirees and increasing the threshold will mean<br />
many more <strong>Victoria</strong>ns will benefit from this assistance in the<br />
future.<br />
During the 2010 election campaign, this government also<br />
announced the introduction <strong>of</strong> a stamp duty exemption for<br />
young farmers. In line with this announcement, this bill will<br />
introduce a duty exemption and concession for persons under<br />
the age <strong>of</strong> 35 on the purchase <strong>of</strong> their first agricultural<br />
property. A full exemption will apply to transactions up to the<br />
value <strong>of</strong> $300 000, with a duty concession applying between<br />
$300 000 and $400 000.<br />
Introducing a duty exemption and concession for young<br />
farmers is important to the long-term future <strong>of</strong> the agricultural<br />
sector and related <strong>Victoria</strong>n industries. The average age <strong>of</strong><br />
farmers is increasing, and the government’s new duty<br />
exemption and concession will encourage more young people<br />
to consider a career in farming. This measure will also help<br />
preserve the viability <strong>of</strong> rural communities by delivering jobs<br />
and increasing investment in both rural and regional areas.<br />
In addition to delivering this government’s state taxation<br />
election commitments, this bill also makes a number <strong>of</strong><br />
general amendments to various revenue laws.<br />
This government is committed to enhancing the productivity<br />
and competitiveness <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Victoria</strong>n economy by ensuring<br />
that no unnecessary burden is imposed on <strong>Victoria</strong>n business.<br />
In line with this commitment the government has continued<br />
efforts to maintain the harmonisation <strong>of</strong> payroll tax legislation<br />
across Australia, which has seen significant administrative<br />
savings for business. This bill will amend the Payroll Tax Act<br />
2007 to remove outdated references to commonwealth<br />
legislation in the employee share scheme provisions. To<br />
maintain harmonisation these amendments were developed in<br />
consultation with the other states and territories.<br />
This bill also amends the Taxation Administration Act 1997<br />
to establish a framework for deeming an assessment to have<br />
been made and served where land transfer duty is paid online.<br />
These amendments will ensure that individuals or businesses<br />
that pay duty online have the same rights and obligations as<br />
other taxpayers. An online duty payment system is currently<br />
being developed and will ultimately make it easier and<br />
cheaper to interact with the SRO and result in significant<br />
administrative savings.<br />
The final measure in this bill is to increase the penalties for<br />
<strong>of</strong>fences under the FHOG act. The FHOG is designed to give<br />
first home buyers the opportunity to enter the competitive<br />
property market. This government is serious about protecting<br />
honest <strong>Victoria</strong>ns and punishing anyone who has gained an<br />
unfair advantage using fraudulent means.<br />
The penalty for providing false and misleading information<br />
will be increased from a maximum <strong>of</strong> 60 penalty units<br />
($7167) to a maximum <strong>of</strong> 120 penalty units ($14 334) and<br />
will include the introduction <strong>of</strong> a 12-month maximum jail<br />
term. The scope <strong>of</strong> this <strong>of</strong>fence will also be broadened to<br />
include the provision <strong>of</strong> false and misleading information in<br />
connection with an FHOG application. This should act as a<br />
strong deterrent for anyone contemplating making a false<br />
claim, and ensures the penalties available reflect the<br />
seriousness <strong>of</strong> this <strong>of</strong>fence.<br />
I commend the bill to the house.<br />
Debate adjourned on motion <strong>of</strong> Mr LENDERS<br />
(Southern Metropolitan).<br />
Debate adjourned until Thursday, 9 June.<br />
BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE<br />
Adjournment<br />
Hon. G. K. RICH-PHILLIPS (Assistant<br />
Treasurer) — I move:<br />
That the Council, at its rising, adjourn until Tuesday, 14 June.<br />
Motion agreed to.<br />
ADJOURNMENT<br />
Hon. G. K. RICH-PHILLIPS (Assistant<br />
Treasurer) — I move:<br />
That the house do now adjourn.<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Premier and Cabinet: catering<br />
Mr LENDERS (Southern Metropolitan) — The<br />
matter I raise on the adjournment tonight is for the<br />
attention <strong>of</strong> the Premier, Mr Baillieu, and it regards the<br />
catering arrangements at the Department <strong>of</strong> Premier<br />
and Cabinet and also the lack <strong>of</strong> curiosity and lack <strong>of</strong><br />
understanding on the part <strong>of</strong> the Minister for Health as<br />
to how his meals are paid for. I was surprised in<br />
question time today — I guess I was underwhelmed —<br />
by the minister’s response to a question he was asked<br />
about catering, which is something he expressed a<br />
particularly strong view about when in opposition. He<br />
had in an FOI request and on Melbourne radio was<br />
thundering on about how evil it was that the catering<br />
costs at the Department <strong>of</strong> Premier and Cabinet were<br />
actually being met. He had a particularly strong view<br />
about ministers being paid so much money that they<br />
should pay their own catering bills.<br />
That is all part and parcel <strong>of</strong> the election debate; I<br />
understand that. Two days from an election an