Book 8 - Parliament of Victoria
Book 8 - Parliament of Victoria
Book 8 - Parliament of Victoria
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS<br />
Wednesday, 1 June 2011 COUNCIL 1653<br />
has introduced more flexibility, at the discretion <strong>of</strong> the<br />
managing director, to lower the storage level in<br />
response to Bureau <strong>of</strong> Meteorology weather forecasts<br />
when there is a low risk <strong>of</strong> not being able to fill the<br />
storage at the end <strong>of</strong> the filling season.<br />
Blue Rock is a relatively large storage on a relatively<br />
small stream. It has a fixed spillway and limited outlet<br />
capacity to control spills. It has not spilled much in<br />
recent history, because the private hydro-electric<br />
company can release water through the outlet at its<br />
discretion from the top 5 metres <strong>of</strong> storage. As this<br />
arrangement with the company ends on 30 June 2011,<br />
Southern Rural Water is considering the need for a new<br />
target filling rule, which would reduce spills after 1 July<br />
2011. This work is in progress.<br />
Melton Reservoir is a small storage on a stream that<br />
generates large flows so there is little opportunity to<br />
mitigate flood flows in the Werribee River. Southern<br />
Rural Water does not see a need to consider changing<br />
the existing rules.<br />
Grampians Wimmera Mallee Water (GWMWater) has<br />
recently extended its existing target filling curve for<br />
Lake Wartook to cater for unusually wet years like<br />
2011 when the storage is full in autumn. GWMWater<br />
will review the existing rules for other Grampians<br />
storages as part <strong>of</strong> its arrangements to develop storage<br />
management rules following the completion <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Wimmera–Mallee pipeline.<br />
In conclusion I reaffirm that there is a parliamentary<br />
review in progress. The water authorities already have<br />
operating rules for the water storages for which they are<br />
responsible. On that basis the government will oppose<br />
the motion.<br />
Debate adjourned on motion <strong>of</strong> Mr LENDERS<br />
(Southern Metropolitan).<br />
Debate adjourned until next day.<br />
PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS<br />
Ms PENNICUIK (Southern Metropolitan) — I<br />
move:<br />
That this house —<br />
(1) notes that the documents ordered by the resolution <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Council on 2 March 2011 to be tabled in the Council by<br />
12 noon on 22 March 2011 have not been received by<br />
the Council;<br />
(2) affirms the privileges, immunities and powers conferred<br />
on the Council pursuant to section 19 <strong>of</strong> the Constitution<br />
Act 1975 and the power to make standing orders under<br />
section 43 <strong>of</strong> that act;<br />
(3) affirms the need to protect the high standing <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>Parliament</strong> and to ensure that the Council may properly<br />
discharge its duties and responsibilities; and<br />
(4) again requires the Leader <strong>of</strong> the Government<br />
representing the Premier to table by 12 noon on<br />
Tuesday, 14 June 2011, a copy <strong>of</strong> —<br />
(a) the financial arrangement/current contract between<br />
the government <strong>of</strong> <strong>Victoria</strong> and the Australian<br />
Grand Prix Corporation (AGPC) regarding the<br />
staging <strong>of</strong> the 2010 Formula One Grand Prix event<br />
and, if not included in the above document, the rent<br />
paid by the AGPC to Parks <strong>Victoria</strong> for the use <strong>of</strong><br />
Albert Park Reserve for the 2010 event, any<br />
subsidies in the form <strong>of</strong> sponsorships, advertising<br />
or corporate entertainment or for other services<br />
relating to the 2010 event, paid by government<br />
departments or agencies to the AGPC, any services<br />
provided to the AGPC by other government<br />
departments (e.g. <strong>Victoria</strong> Police) relating to the<br />
2010 event;<br />
(b) the economic study performed as the basis <strong>of</strong> the<br />
five-year contract extension to 2015; and<br />
(c) the most recent cost-benefit analysis <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Australian Grand Prix.<br />
In brief, this motion asks the house to note that the<br />
documents I called for on 2 March and 22 March<br />
relating to the costs <strong>of</strong> the Australian Formula One<br />
Grand Prix 2010 as listed in the motion have not been<br />
received. The Clerk has received two letters regarding<br />
the Council’s call for these documents, and the first <strong>of</strong><br />
those said the house was not able to be furnished with<br />
the documents because the grand prix was occurring at<br />
the time and it would interrupt the ability <strong>of</strong> Major<br />
Projects <strong>Victoria</strong>, I presume, to locate the documents I<br />
was asking for.<br />
On 24 May, in the last week <strong>of</strong> sitting, the Clerk<br />
received from the Attorney-General another letter,<br />
which said:<br />
I refer to the Legislative Council’s order <strong>of</strong> 2 March 2011,<br />
seeking the production <strong>of</strong> certain documents relating to the<br />
Australian Grand Prix by 22 March 2011.<br />
I also refer to my letter <strong>of</strong> 21 March 2011, in which I advised<br />
that the government would not be able to respond within the<br />
Council’s deadline.<br />
The government is continuing to process its response to this<br />
order and is currently assessing relevant documents. The<br />
government will endeavour to respond shortly.<br />
The date <strong>of</strong> that letter is two months after the first<br />
deadline, which was 22 March, and almost three<br />
months after the date the motion was moved, which is<br />
2 March. I have moved this motion to require the