Book 8 - Parliament of Victoria
Book 8 - Parliament of Victoria
Book 8 - Parliament of Victoria
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE<br />
Thursday, 2 June 2011 COUNCIL 1701<br />
initiated postponements, hospital early warning systems<br />
data and like data on transfer times. That information<br />
ought to have been in the public domain to enable the<br />
system, the hospital and the community to make better<br />
judgements about how the system is performing and to<br />
assist it to improve.<br />
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE<br />
Answers<br />
Hon. D. M. DAVIS (Minister for Health) — I have<br />
the following answers to questions on notice: 178,<br />
255–318, 323–35, 598, 622, 623 and 676.<br />
PUBLIC HOLIDAYS AMENDMENT BILL<br />
2011<br />
Debate resumed.<br />
Second reading<br />
Mr ELASMAR (Northern Metropolitan) — As I<br />
was saying before question time, giving the<br />
non-metropolitan councils the authority to determine<br />
which public holidays its workers can take is an<br />
either/or decision. It is not both Melbourne Cup and<br />
Melbourne show days. This bill treats people in rural<br />
<strong>Victoria</strong> as second-class citizens, not sophisticated<br />
enough to stop work to celebrate the race that stops the<br />
nation but hopefully sufficiently dedicated to their own<br />
rural communities to choose their own show day. I<br />
think it is heartbreaking that we cannot celebrate a<br />
public holiday on Melbourne Show Day as we used to.<br />
It is a fantastic family event that ranks with school<br />
holidays.<br />
The honourable man, as Mr Finn called my colleague<br />
Mr Somyurek, has proposed an important amendment<br />
to this bill. That amendment is about Easter Sunday,<br />
which is a very important day for families. I urge<br />
members in this house to support the amendment as I<br />
will support it.<br />
Motion agreed to.<br />
Read second time.<br />
Referral to committee<br />
Ms PULFORD (Western <strong>Victoria</strong>) — I move:<br />
That the Public Holidays Amendment Bill 2011 be referred to<br />
the Standing Committee on Economy and Infrastructure<br />
Legislation Committee for inquiry, consideration and report<br />
by 28 June 2011 and that the committee consider in particular<br />
the impact <strong>of</strong> the half-day public holiday provisions in the bill<br />
on employers and employees.<br />
I will make a couple <strong>of</strong> brief remarks in support <strong>of</strong> my<br />
motion as it is reasonably self-explanatory. Mr Finn<br />
was right when he said the committee was busy, but<br />
this is a very narrowly defined matter with a short<br />
reporting date <strong>of</strong> something less than four weeks. The<br />
reporting date I am seeking is the Tuesday <strong>of</strong> the sitting<br />
week before the long recess. We are hoping to use the<br />
legislation committee in the way it was intended — that<br />
is, as a quick Senate-style committee to look at a very<br />
narrow subject. I envisage the committee will consider<br />
the specific impact <strong>of</strong> the half-day provisions in this bill<br />
on employees and employers who may be affected by<br />
these changes.<br />
I am proposing this inquiry because we are concerned<br />
about the way in which the provisions in this legislation<br />
intersect with other types <strong>of</strong> industrial arrangements<br />
that govern various workplaces in regional <strong>Victoria</strong>.<br />
We are concerned to ensure that <strong>Victoria</strong>n businesses<br />
are not overly burdened with additional red tape and<br />
that councils, when making the types <strong>of</strong> decisions that<br />
are envisaged by the legislation, can do so knowing<br />
they have as much information as possible about the<br />
impact on businesses in their municipalities and on the<br />
employees who work for them.<br />
Ms PENNICUIK (Southern Metropolitan) — The<br />
Greens will support Ms Pulford’s motion to refer the<br />
bill to the Standing Committee on Economy and<br />
Infrastructure Legislation Committee for inquiry,<br />
consideration and report by 28 June, which is not that<br />
far away and will allow for the bill to come back to be<br />
reconsidered by the house.<br />
There have been issues raised in the debate on this bill<br />
about the implications for workers and employers <strong>of</strong> the<br />
provision which would allow the declaration <strong>of</strong><br />
half-day holidays and also half-day holidays in different<br />
parts <strong>of</strong> the municipality. This may create confusion,<br />
whereas the existing provisions that were put in place<br />
with the 2008 amendments to the act allow for<br />
flexibility but also allow for more clarity across a<br />
municipality as to what is a public holiday, whether<br />
there is a particular holiday for that locality or whether<br />
the default public holiday is in fact Melbourne Cup<br />
Day.<br />
The issue is worthy <strong>of</strong> consideration by that committee.<br />
However, I also remind members who attended the<br />
address by the Clerk <strong>of</strong> the Senate, Dr Rosemary Laing,<br />
that she said as a matter <strong>of</strong> course many bills were<br />
referred to Senate committees for even short periods <strong>of</strong><br />
time, and many <strong>of</strong> them came back with small changes<br />
or amendments. In most cases small changes or<br />
amendments to the bill to make sure it operates<br />
properly are actually put forward by the government;<br />
they are not put forward by the other parties.