05.04.2013 Views

Book 8 - Parliament of Victoria

Book 8 - Parliament of Victoria

Book 8 - Parliament of Victoria

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

QUESTIONS ON NOTICE<br />

Thursday, 2 June 2011 COUNCIL 1701<br />

initiated postponements, hospital early warning systems<br />

data and like data on transfer times. That information<br />

ought to have been in the public domain to enable the<br />

system, the hospital and the community to make better<br />

judgements about how the system is performing and to<br />

assist it to improve.<br />

QUESTIONS ON NOTICE<br />

Answers<br />

Hon. D. M. DAVIS (Minister for Health) — I have<br />

the following answers to questions on notice: 178,<br />

255–318, 323–35, 598, 622, 623 and 676.<br />

PUBLIC HOLIDAYS AMENDMENT BILL<br />

2011<br />

Debate resumed.<br />

Second reading<br />

Mr ELASMAR (Northern Metropolitan) — As I<br />

was saying before question time, giving the<br />

non-metropolitan councils the authority to determine<br />

which public holidays its workers can take is an<br />

either/or decision. It is not both Melbourne Cup and<br />

Melbourne show days. This bill treats people in rural<br />

<strong>Victoria</strong> as second-class citizens, not sophisticated<br />

enough to stop work to celebrate the race that stops the<br />

nation but hopefully sufficiently dedicated to their own<br />

rural communities to choose their own show day. I<br />

think it is heartbreaking that we cannot celebrate a<br />

public holiday on Melbourne Show Day as we used to.<br />

It is a fantastic family event that ranks with school<br />

holidays.<br />

The honourable man, as Mr Finn called my colleague<br />

Mr Somyurek, has proposed an important amendment<br />

to this bill. That amendment is about Easter Sunday,<br />

which is a very important day for families. I urge<br />

members in this house to support the amendment as I<br />

will support it.<br />

Motion agreed to.<br />

Read second time.<br />

Referral to committee<br />

Ms PULFORD (Western <strong>Victoria</strong>) — I move:<br />

That the Public Holidays Amendment Bill 2011 be referred to<br />

the Standing Committee on Economy and Infrastructure<br />

Legislation Committee for inquiry, consideration and report<br />

by 28 June 2011 and that the committee consider in particular<br />

the impact <strong>of</strong> the half-day public holiday provisions in the bill<br />

on employers and employees.<br />

I will make a couple <strong>of</strong> brief remarks in support <strong>of</strong> my<br />

motion as it is reasonably self-explanatory. Mr Finn<br />

was right when he said the committee was busy, but<br />

this is a very narrowly defined matter with a short<br />

reporting date <strong>of</strong> something less than four weeks. The<br />

reporting date I am seeking is the Tuesday <strong>of</strong> the sitting<br />

week before the long recess. We are hoping to use the<br />

legislation committee in the way it was intended — that<br />

is, as a quick Senate-style committee to look at a very<br />

narrow subject. I envisage the committee will consider<br />

the specific impact <strong>of</strong> the half-day provisions in this bill<br />

on employees and employers who may be affected by<br />

these changes.<br />

I am proposing this inquiry because we are concerned<br />

about the way in which the provisions in this legislation<br />

intersect with other types <strong>of</strong> industrial arrangements<br />

that govern various workplaces in regional <strong>Victoria</strong>.<br />

We are concerned to ensure that <strong>Victoria</strong>n businesses<br />

are not overly burdened with additional red tape and<br />

that councils, when making the types <strong>of</strong> decisions that<br />

are envisaged by the legislation, can do so knowing<br />

they have as much information as possible about the<br />

impact on businesses in their municipalities and on the<br />

employees who work for them.<br />

Ms PENNICUIK (Southern Metropolitan) — The<br />

Greens will support Ms Pulford’s motion to refer the<br />

bill to the Standing Committee on Economy and<br />

Infrastructure Legislation Committee for inquiry,<br />

consideration and report by 28 June, which is not that<br />

far away and will allow for the bill to come back to be<br />

reconsidered by the house.<br />

There have been issues raised in the debate on this bill<br />

about the implications for workers and employers <strong>of</strong> the<br />

provision which would allow the declaration <strong>of</strong><br />

half-day holidays and also half-day holidays in different<br />

parts <strong>of</strong> the municipality. This may create confusion,<br />

whereas the existing provisions that were put in place<br />

with the 2008 amendments to the act allow for<br />

flexibility but also allow for more clarity across a<br />

municipality as to what is a public holiday, whether<br />

there is a particular holiday for that locality or whether<br />

the default public holiday is in fact Melbourne Cup<br />

Day.<br />

The issue is worthy <strong>of</strong> consideration by that committee.<br />

However, I also remind members who attended the<br />

address by the Clerk <strong>of</strong> the Senate, Dr Rosemary Laing,<br />

that she said as a matter <strong>of</strong> course many bills were<br />

referred to Senate committees for even short periods <strong>of</strong><br />

time, and many <strong>of</strong> them came back with small changes<br />

or amendments. In most cases small changes or<br />

amendments to the bill to make sure it operates<br />

properly are actually put forward by the government;<br />

they are not put forward by the other parties.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!