Book 8 - Parliament of Victoria
Book 8 - Parliament of Victoria
Book 8 - Parliament of Victoria
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
AUSTRALIAN SYNCHROTRON: FUNDING<br />
Wednesday, 1 June 2011 COUNCIL 1643<br />
The Baillieu government’s failure to fund the<br />
Australian Synchrotron puts its future and <strong>Victoria</strong>’s<br />
reputation as a state <strong>of</strong> excellence in science and<br />
innovation at risk. It may also undermine our<br />
attractiveness for overseas companies looking to invest<br />
in <strong>Victoria</strong>n manufacturing and establish new<br />
enterprises here. Despite the immediate pressure on our<br />
manufacturing industry from the changing value <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Australian dollar, which is making our exports more<br />
expensive and our imports cheaper, the Baillieu<br />
government ignored the opportunity presented by last<br />
month’s budget to provide a serious policy response to<br />
the competitive strains put on <strong>Victoria</strong>n manufacturers<br />
by the current high value <strong>of</strong> the Australian dollar.<br />
The <strong>Victoria</strong>n manufacturing industry is heavily reliant<br />
on our competitive advantage in high-tech<br />
manufacturing. The sector invests 43 per cent <strong>of</strong> total<br />
<strong>Victoria</strong>n expenditure on research and development.<br />
That is all at risk now, yet regardless <strong>of</strong> current and<br />
future opportunities for advanced manufacturing<br />
through the operation <strong>of</strong> the synchrotron, the Baillieu<br />
government decided to stop funding it. Just like that,<br />
out <strong>of</strong> nowhere.<br />
Mr Barber interjected.<br />
Mr SOMYUREK — I do not think so, Mr Barber. I<br />
think the government just happened to land on the<br />
synchrotron.<br />
The previous Labor governments worked hard to<br />
establish <strong>Victoria</strong> as the high-tech capital <strong>of</strong> Australia.<br />
This high-tech capability has facilitated the<br />
development <strong>of</strong> viable and competitive new<br />
manufacturing processes and capacities in the <strong>Victoria</strong>n<br />
manufacturing sector at the same time as it has faced<br />
increased competition from countries with low labour<br />
costs and significant government support for industry.<br />
Its failure to fund the synchrotron shows that the<br />
Baillieu government simply does not understand<br />
modern manufacturing or how to help our<br />
manufacturers access new global opportunities using<br />
the very latest technologies. The Baillieu government<br />
does not understand that governments have a<br />
responsibility to help industry build domestic and<br />
international competitiveness through the attraction <strong>of</strong><br />
investment and the provision <strong>of</strong> support for research<br />
and development, innovation and technological<br />
transfer.<br />
The ACTING PRESIDENT (Mr Ramsay) —<br />
Order! Being a sheep farmer I got quite excited during<br />
Mr Somyurek’s speech. I thought he was going to<br />
suggest that the ugg boot was the icon <strong>of</strong> the<br />
manufacturing industry.<br />
Mr ONDARCHIE (Northern Metropolitan) — I<br />
rise today to oppose Mr Somyurek’s motion. He was<br />
right in one aspect <strong>of</strong> his discussion — that it is all<br />
about the numbers. It is interesting to note that the<br />
Labor Party takes this so seriously, but who among the<br />
Labor members <strong>of</strong> this house was here to listen to<br />
Mr Somyurek’s speech today? There were zero<br />
members <strong>of</strong> the Labor Party here. It is all about the<br />
numbers. Such is the importance <strong>of</strong> their view about<br />
this matter.<br />
The Australian Synchrotron — just so we know what<br />
the correct pronunciation is — was launched in July<br />
2007. The former government contributed $157 million<br />
to fund the synchrotron machine and the building that<br />
housed it. Partners committed $50 million to fund the<br />
beamline and the commonwealth government provided<br />
a further $14 million. The total cost to build the<br />
Australian Synchrotron was $220 million, which was<br />
$63 million more than the original estimate. We are<br />
seeing a pattern here.<br />
The Australian Synchrotron has a dual board structure,<br />
with assets held by the Australian Synchrotron Holding<br />
Company, and the operational company is the<br />
Australian Synchrotron Company. Mrs Catherine<br />
Walter, AM, is the current chair <strong>of</strong> the Australian<br />
Synchrotron Company and was appointed by the<br />
former <strong>Victoria</strong>n government in November 2007 for a<br />
five-year term.<br />
In its 2007–08 budget the commonwealth committed<br />
$50 million towards the cost <strong>of</strong> running the Australian<br />
Synchrotron in its first five years <strong>of</strong> operation, subject<br />
to the explicit requirement that <strong>Victoria</strong> provide<br />
matching funds. These funds are held in a dedicated<br />
trust that is managed by the <strong>Victoria</strong>n government. The<br />
New Zealand government, as Mr Somyurek pointed<br />
out, contributes $750 000 per annum towards the<br />
synchrotron’s operating costs. That funding envelope<br />
concludes in June 2012.<br />
Interestingly the commonwealth government in its<br />
budget for the fiscal year 2011–12 did not commit<br />
future funding for the Australian Synchrotron. In an<br />
interview broadcast on 20 May, Senator Kim Carr, the<br />
federal Minister for Innovation, Industry, Science and<br />
Research, indicated that the commonwealth would seek<br />
to change the governance structure <strong>of</strong> the Australian<br />
Synchrotron as a condition <strong>of</strong> additional<br />
commonwealth funding. He observed that the<br />
commonwealth government does not currently have a<br />
seat on the board and has no capacity to influence the