05.04.2013 Views

Book 8 - Parliament of Victoria

Book 8 - Parliament of Victoria

Book 8 - Parliament of Victoria

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

AUSTRALIAN SYNCHROTRON: FUNDING<br />

1644 COUNCIL Wednesday, 1 June 2011<br />

Australian synchrotron’s operations. Maybe the federal<br />

government has been flat out trying to work out its<br />

carbon tax — this great big new tax that will affect<br />

every single Australian.<br />

Mr Finn — And achieve nothing.<br />

Mr ONDARCHIE — It will increase the cost <strong>of</strong><br />

energy, and, as Mr Finn has just said, it will achieve<br />

nothing. It will increase the cost <strong>of</strong> goods and services,<br />

and importantly it will threaten Australian jobs.<br />

Mr Finn — Hundreds and thousands <strong>of</strong> them.<br />

Mr ONDARCHIE — Hundreds and thousands <strong>of</strong><br />

Australian jobs will be at risk due to this great big new<br />

tax. Where is the Labor Party on this? It is silent.<br />

We on this side <strong>of</strong> the house acknowledge the scientific<br />

value <strong>of</strong> the synchrotron. This is yet another example <strong>of</strong><br />

a project that was botched by the inept Brumby Labor<br />

government. To put the issue completely into context,<br />

this project was late and it was over budget. That is<br />

almost a bumper sticker for the former government:<br />

‘We were late and over budget’. The project was one<br />

year late in delivery. The former government<br />

announced it would be finished in June 2006, but it<br />

opened in July 2007 and it was over budget. The<br />

Auditor-General has gone through that in his report.<br />

The situation left by the previous government has<br />

meant that there is no funding for the synchrotron<br />

beyond 2012. It was late and over budget.<br />

There are two funding scenarios on the table. The<br />

minimum funding requirement for the synchrotron is<br />

$156 million over four years, but if the synchrotron<br />

wishes to position itself as world class and world scale,<br />

which is what the Australian Synchrotron Company<br />

wants to do, the funding requirement would be<br />

$294 million over four years. That is the level <strong>of</strong> the<br />

shortfall. That is the level <strong>of</strong> the black hole. Late, over<br />

budget and a black hole — we see a recurring theme<br />

here with the Brumby Labor government.<br />

In addition there was some capacity to negotiate with<br />

the commonwealth government for some <strong>of</strong> this<br />

funding. And guess what? I regret to inform this house<br />

that the Brumby Labor government did not even bother<br />

to do the tough work <strong>of</strong> negotiating funding from the<br />

commonwealth government. It failed to negotiate with<br />

the commonwealth government for some funding for<br />

this project, and today the former government sits<br />

opposite — I would say en masse, but it is singularly —<br />

and bleats that this project has not got appropriate<br />

funding.<br />

Mr O’Donohue — There are two <strong>of</strong> them.<br />

Mr ONDARCHIE — There you go. There is no<br />

surprise about that. I understand that the<br />

commonwealth government has indicated its<br />

willingness to discuss the synchrotron’s future. I also<br />

acknowledge that the commonwealth has previously<br />

provided $50 million in recurrent funding and<br />

$14 million in beamline funding for the synchrotron,<br />

and we recognise the fantastic work <strong>of</strong> the previous<br />

Howard government in getting that project under way.<br />

However, negotiating with the commonwealth should<br />

have been a key priority for the previous state<br />

government, and it was not. It forgot. It is a bit like the<br />

desalination plant — late, over budget and ‘We forgot’.<br />

The former government rushed headlong into the<br />

synchrotron project. It bypassed the Australian<br />

Synchrotron bid, which probably would have been a<br />

better-thought-out bid, to establish its own synchrotron.<br />

It is a bit like a ticketing system: ‘Let’s not listen to the<br />

experts; let’s do our own thing’ — myki mania at its<br />

best. Unfortunately for the synchrotron there are no<br />

plans and no funding, and — here is the catch — no<br />

idea has been left behind by the previous government.<br />

This is another example <strong>of</strong> a Labor financial mess and<br />

yet another problem the Baillieu coalition government<br />

will have to fix. Members <strong>of</strong> the former government<br />

were wayward. They were like ball boys at the French<br />

Open. They just ran and charged headlong into the<br />

action without any consideration for the implications.<br />

Late, over budget and no negotiation with the<br />

commonwealth — there is a recurring theme here.<br />

I have to say that funding for 2011–12 is secure. The<br />

first five years <strong>of</strong> the operation have been jointly funded<br />

by the <strong>Victoria</strong>n government and the commonwealth<br />

government, each committing $50 million. The funds<br />

are held in a dedicated trust, as I have spoken about.<br />

The New Zealand government has also contributed<br />

three-quarters <strong>of</strong> a million dollars per annum to the<br />

operating costs.<br />

The Australian Synchrotron is required to provide an<br />

annual budget by 31 May each year for the following<br />

financial year. To be fair I am not sure if it did that by<br />

yesterday’s deadline. We acknowledge the value <strong>of</strong> the<br />

synchrotron. Our criticism is directed at the former<br />

government’s mismanagement <strong>of</strong> the project — a<br />

$57 million cost blow-out, one year late in delivery and<br />

no plans as to how the recurrent funding will be funded.<br />

There are no plans for its future operation.<br />

Ongoing funding was only achieved when the then<br />

Howard government contributed $50 million for five<br />

years until 2012 on the condition that the state<br />

government matched that funding. That was the former

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!