Book 8 - Parliament of Victoria
Book 8 - Parliament of Victoria
Book 8 - Parliament of Victoria
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
AUSTRALIAN SYNCHROTRON: FUNDING<br />
1644 COUNCIL Wednesday, 1 June 2011<br />
Australian synchrotron’s operations. Maybe the federal<br />
government has been flat out trying to work out its<br />
carbon tax — this great big new tax that will affect<br />
every single Australian.<br />
Mr Finn — And achieve nothing.<br />
Mr ONDARCHIE — It will increase the cost <strong>of</strong><br />
energy, and, as Mr Finn has just said, it will achieve<br />
nothing. It will increase the cost <strong>of</strong> goods and services,<br />
and importantly it will threaten Australian jobs.<br />
Mr Finn — Hundreds and thousands <strong>of</strong> them.<br />
Mr ONDARCHIE — Hundreds and thousands <strong>of</strong><br />
Australian jobs will be at risk due to this great big new<br />
tax. Where is the Labor Party on this? It is silent.<br />
We on this side <strong>of</strong> the house acknowledge the scientific<br />
value <strong>of</strong> the synchrotron. This is yet another example <strong>of</strong><br />
a project that was botched by the inept Brumby Labor<br />
government. To put the issue completely into context,<br />
this project was late and it was over budget. That is<br />
almost a bumper sticker for the former government:<br />
‘We were late and over budget’. The project was one<br />
year late in delivery. The former government<br />
announced it would be finished in June 2006, but it<br />
opened in July 2007 and it was over budget. The<br />
Auditor-General has gone through that in his report.<br />
The situation left by the previous government has<br />
meant that there is no funding for the synchrotron<br />
beyond 2012. It was late and over budget.<br />
There are two funding scenarios on the table. The<br />
minimum funding requirement for the synchrotron is<br />
$156 million over four years, but if the synchrotron<br />
wishes to position itself as world class and world scale,<br />
which is what the Australian Synchrotron Company<br />
wants to do, the funding requirement would be<br />
$294 million over four years. That is the level <strong>of</strong> the<br />
shortfall. That is the level <strong>of</strong> the black hole. Late, over<br />
budget and a black hole — we see a recurring theme<br />
here with the Brumby Labor government.<br />
In addition there was some capacity to negotiate with<br />
the commonwealth government for some <strong>of</strong> this<br />
funding. And guess what? I regret to inform this house<br />
that the Brumby Labor government did not even bother<br />
to do the tough work <strong>of</strong> negotiating funding from the<br />
commonwealth government. It failed to negotiate with<br />
the commonwealth government for some funding for<br />
this project, and today the former government sits<br />
opposite — I would say en masse, but it is singularly —<br />
and bleats that this project has not got appropriate<br />
funding.<br />
Mr O’Donohue — There are two <strong>of</strong> them.<br />
Mr ONDARCHIE — There you go. There is no<br />
surprise about that. I understand that the<br />
commonwealth government has indicated its<br />
willingness to discuss the synchrotron’s future. I also<br />
acknowledge that the commonwealth has previously<br />
provided $50 million in recurrent funding and<br />
$14 million in beamline funding for the synchrotron,<br />
and we recognise the fantastic work <strong>of</strong> the previous<br />
Howard government in getting that project under way.<br />
However, negotiating with the commonwealth should<br />
have been a key priority for the previous state<br />
government, and it was not. It forgot. It is a bit like the<br />
desalination plant — late, over budget and ‘We forgot’.<br />
The former government rushed headlong into the<br />
synchrotron project. It bypassed the Australian<br />
Synchrotron bid, which probably would have been a<br />
better-thought-out bid, to establish its own synchrotron.<br />
It is a bit like a ticketing system: ‘Let’s not listen to the<br />
experts; let’s do our own thing’ — myki mania at its<br />
best. Unfortunately for the synchrotron there are no<br />
plans and no funding, and — here is the catch — no<br />
idea has been left behind by the previous government.<br />
This is another example <strong>of</strong> a Labor financial mess and<br />
yet another problem the Baillieu coalition government<br />
will have to fix. Members <strong>of</strong> the former government<br />
were wayward. They were like ball boys at the French<br />
Open. They just ran and charged headlong into the<br />
action without any consideration for the implications.<br />
Late, over budget and no negotiation with the<br />
commonwealth — there is a recurring theme here.<br />
I have to say that funding for 2011–12 is secure. The<br />
first five years <strong>of</strong> the operation have been jointly funded<br />
by the <strong>Victoria</strong>n government and the commonwealth<br />
government, each committing $50 million. The funds<br />
are held in a dedicated trust, as I have spoken about.<br />
The New Zealand government has also contributed<br />
three-quarters <strong>of</strong> a million dollars per annum to the<br />
operating costs.<br />
The Australian Synchrotron is required to provide an<br />
annual budget by 31 May each year for the following<br />
financial year. To be fair I am not sure if it did that by<br />
yesterday’s deadline. We acknowledge the value <strong>of</strong> the<br />
synchrotron. Our criticism is directed at the former<br />
government’s mismanagement <strong>of</strong> the project — a<br />
$57 million cost blow-out, one year late in delivery and<br />
no plans as to how the recurrent funding will be funded.<br />
There are no plans for its future operation.<br />
Ongoing funding was only achieved when the then<br />
Howard government contributed $50 million for five<br />
years until 2012 on the condition that the state<br />
government matched that funding. That was the former