09.05.2013 Views

extraordinary%20encounters

extraordinary%20encounters

extraordinary%20encounters

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

xvi Introduction<br />

deed to every indication channeling is just<br />

that. It is not veridical (that is, independently<br />

witnessed or otherwise shown not to be a subjective<br />

experience); no channeling entity can<br />

prove its existence, and the information provided<br />

through the channeling process is susceptible<br />

to neither verification nor falsification.<br />

The “authority” of the channeling entity<br />

rests solely on its self-identification. If you believe<br />

he, she, or it is a discarnate Atlantean,<br />

space alien, or ascended master, you will believe<br />

what he, she, or it has to say. If you<br />

choose not to believe any of that, the channeling<br />

entity will prove helpless to get you to<br />

change your mind. Experiences such as close<br />

encounters, conversely, may be veridical in the<br />

sense that on occasion they involve multiple—or,<br />

more rarely, independent—observers.<br />

In the case of multiply witnessed close encounters,<br />

subjective explanations are applied<br />

only with difficulty. An investigator in search<br />

of an explanation has limited choices, usually<br />

three: (1) the claimants made up the story; (2)<br />

they naively misperceived what were in fact<br />

conventional stimuli; or (3) they underwent<br />

an extraordinary experience that defies current<br />

understanding.<br />

Between the extremes is a broad range of<br />

nonexperiential material, a modern folklore in<br />

which the world and the cosmos are reinvented<br />

on the basis of believed-in but undocumented<br />

(and often, to those who care about<br />

such things, certifiably false) allegations. Most<br />

persons who circulate such stuff are sincere,<br />

but some of those who feed the stuff to them<br />

are not. Hoaxers provide documents, such as<br />

the supposed diary attesting to Adm. Richard<br />

E. Byrd’s voyage into the hollow earth<br />

through a hole at the North Pole, that believers<br />

cite to prove their cases. Most observers<br />

believe James Churchward’s famous (or notorious)<br />

books on the alleged lost continent of<br />

Mu are literary hoaxes—Churchward was<br />

never able to produce the ancient documents<br />

on which he asserted he had based his work—<br />

but earnest occultists and New Agers cite his<br />

books as overwhelming evidence that Mu<br />

(more often called Lemuria) was a real place.<br />

Of course, embellishments grow on top of<br />

embellishments, and every legend of a place, a<br />

world, or a realm that is home to otherworldly<br />

beings evolves and has its own rich history.<br />

Atlantis, for example, began as an advanced<br />

civilization for its time, but by our time its<br />

people had come to be seen as advanced even<br />

beyond us, the creators of fantastic technologies<br />

and even the recipient of knowledge from<br />

extraterrestrial sources. The hollow earth of<br />

John Cleves Symmes (1779–1829) is not the<br />

hollow earth of Walter Siegmeister (a.k.a.<br />

Raymond W. Bernard, 1901–1965), any<br />

more than the imagination of one century is<br />

the imagination of the century that follows it.<br />

Flying saucers were not part of Symmes’s<br />

world; consequently, they did not exist in his<br />

hollow earth. By the time Siegmeister wrote<br />

The Hollow Earth (1964), no alternative-reality<br />

book could lack flying saucers.<br />

It is entirely likely that nothing in the book<br />

you are about to read will tell you anything<br />

about actual extraordinary encounters and<br />

otherworldly beings. If such exist, however, it<br />

is not beyond the range of possibility that<br />

somewhere amid the noise of folklore, belief,<br />

superstition, credulity, out-of-control thinking,<br />

and out-of-ordinary perception a signal<br />

may be sounding. If so, it is a faint one, indeed.<br />

The world has always been overrun with<br />

otherworldly experiences, some of which certainly<br />

appear to resist glib accounting; yet so<br />

far it has proved exasperatingly tricky to establish<br />

that otherworldly experiences are also otherworldly<br />

events. The otherworld, perhaps,<br />

can happen to any of us at any time, but we<br />

may not live in it—at least if we know what’s<br />

good for us—in the way that we live enclosed<br />

within the four walls of the physical structure<br />

in which we read these words. It is not wise to<br />

pass through a world of physical laws while<br />

distracted by all-encompassing dreams. Even<br />

so, there is still a nobility to dreaming. There is<br />

also an undying appeal to the sort of romantic<br />

impatience that imagines new worlds bigger<br />

and more wondrous than our own, then

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!