13.05.2013 Views

History of Amesbury - Merrill.org

History of Amesbury - Merrill.org

History of Amesbury - Merrill.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

14 HISTORY OF AMESBURY.<br />

Sept. 4th the General Court named the plantation at Merrimack,<br />

Colchester. No clue is given to the reason <strong>of</strong> this name, as the<br />

town records are silent, not even mentioning the name, which<br />

seems not to have been satisfactory to the company.<br />

In the early part <strong>of</strong> the year a committee was chosen to order<br />

the affairs <strong>of</strong> the company ; but in November a petition was<br />

presented to the General Court for the appointment <strong>of</strong> "men to<br />

manage their affairs", and Samuel Dudley, Rev. Wm. Worcester,<br />

Christopher Batt, Samuel Winsley, John Sanders and Henry<br />

Mundy were appointed "to order all business <strong>of</strong> the towne so<br />

as this court doth expect & reserve power to that end, that<br />

such as have indirectly obtained greater lotts then <strong>of</strong> dewe belongs<br />

to them, the same should be reformed, & that care bee taken<br />

for pventing such inconveniences herraff."<br />

It might seem strange that any dispute should have arisen in<br />

regard to land, when every man had more than he knew what<br />

to do with, but this attempt at reform shows that selfishness<br />

was no stranger to our ancestors. Who the unfortunate persons<br />

were who had received more land than they were justly entitled<br />

to it is impossible to say, as the records give no account <strong>of</strong> the<br />

matter, or whether the new committee, composed as it was<br />

largely <strong>of</strong> the old, ever carried out the purpose for which they<br />

were appointed, we cannot say.<br />

There were three meetings this year, as appears by the record,*<br />

viz : "3 month— 7th 9 mo.— 29th 10 mo." No rules for the<br />

government <strong>of</strong> the meetings had yet been adopted, and no doubt<br />

some <strong>of</strong> the "firemen" had very crude notions <strong>of</strong> an orderly<br />

town meeting. Anthony Colby didn't seem to understand how<br />

to behave respectfully, according to the ideas <strong>of</strong> the "major<br />

•part <strong>of</strong> the meeting," and was fined 1 s. for being disorderly.<br />

Willi. Hook thought he had a right to go home when he pleased,<br />

and was "fined 1 s. for leaving the meeting without leave."<br />

With the first settlers goats were very common, and to some<br />

extent took the place <strong>of</strong> cows which were scarce. They were<br />

however, a great nuisance to other people than their owners<br />

when allowed to run at large, and the meeting ordered a fine<br />

*No doubt there were more.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!