Privacy and Injunctions - Evidence - Parliament

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Rt Hon Dominic Grieve QC MP, Attorney General—Oral evidence (QQ 1070–1102) Rt Hon Dominic Grieve QC MP, Attorney General—Oral evidence (QQ 1070–1102) Evidence heard in Public Questions 1070–1102 MONDAY 16 JANUARY 2012 Members present: Mr John Whittingdale (in the Chair) Lord Black of Brentwood Lord Boateng Mr Ben Bradshaw Mr Robert Buckland The Lord Bishop of Chester Baroness Corston Lord Dobbs George Eustice Paul Farrelly Lord Gold Lord Harries of Pentregarth Martin Horwood Lord Janvrin Eric Joyce Lord Mawhinney Penny Mordaunt Lord Myners Yasmin Qureshi Nadhim Zahawi ________________ Examination of Witness Witness: Rt Hon Dominic Grieve QC MP, Attorney General, examined. Q1070 Chair: I welcome the Attorney General, Dominic Grieve. Perhaps I may begin by asking you generally to set out the factors which you take into account when you decide whether or not to bring proceedings for contempt of court in relation to the disobedience of a court order. 10
Rt Hon Dominic Grieve QC MP, Attorney General—Oral evidence (QQ 1070–1102) Mr Grieve: The first general point, which the Committee probably knows already, is that if I am acting in proceedings for contempt, I am carrying out a responsibility as Guardian of the Public Interest and act entirely independently of the Government. The next thing to be understood is that a distinction must be drawn in my functions in relation to contempt arising in criminal proceedings and civil proceedings. In relation to the criminal law, proceedings can be instituted only under the Contempt of Court Act 1981 with my consent or by me, so I have a direct role which reflects the fact that criminal prosecutions are brought in the name of the Crown. But in relation to civil proceedings, I am not a party. I emphasise that normally I will not have any knowledge of the individual cases. The primary responsibility for bringing proceedings for contempt for the breach of a civil order made in civil litigation—for example an injunction—lies with the party who sought the order in the first place. Generally, it is not for me to use public resources to interfere in private litigation, but I do have the power, which I suppose might be described as a reserve power, to intervene to bring an action for contempt in relation to civil proceedings. I would exercise that power only in exceptional circumstances where there was a clear public interest in bringing such proceedings, and I concluded that nobody else would and therefore no protection would be afforded. There are no hard and fast rules about this. I suppose that, looking at the sort of categories we might be considering, if I thought breach of a civil order was endangering somebody’s life, or seriously endangering their welfare, and nobody else was going to act, I might consider intervention. I might also consider intervention if I thought that what was happening was a systematic conspiracy—I suppose that is the way to describe it—to undermine the ability of the civil courts to carry out their work. I am not being prescriptive because I can well imagine other examples could arise, but this would be a very unusual course of action to take and one that, generally speaking, Attorneys General do not have to take. Q1071 Chair: In the case of some injunctions where the identity of the person concerned is widely known, often through the internet, newspapers have sought almost to tweak the tail of the law by printing stories about that person such that, if you are in the know as to the fact that that individual is the subject of an injunction, it is quite obvious that that story is designed to highlight the fact. Is it still your view that that is a matter for the individual to pursue and not a matter where you should intervene? Mr Grieve: Principally, it is a matter for the individual to pursue. After all, it is the individual who went before court in the first place and initiated litigation in order to get protection. The protection is designed to protect that person and his legal rights. Generally speaking, if you are to have a civil injunction and there is a breach, or even the threat of it, it is for the individual to assert his rights by taking the matter back before the court. As guardian of the public interest, it is not for me to intervene unless the circumstances are such that there may be a wider public interest point that requires my intervention. You gave the example of newspapers. As to an individual playing around on the limits, there is no particular reason I should intervene with a newspaper in such circumstances. The fact that it is a newspaper as opposed to an individual does not come into it one way or the other. I do not think the fact that it is a blogger or tweeter are relevant considerations. My consideration of it would arise if I thought there was a wider public interest issue that gave me cause for concern and it was the only way to ensure that the integrity of the justice system could be protected, or that overwhelmingly the rights of 11
Page 1 and 2: JOINT COMMITTEE ON PRIVACY AND INJU
Page 3 and 4: Andrew Mullins, managing director,
Page 5 and 6: National Union of Journalists (NUJ)
Page 7 and 8: Ashley Van Haeften, Nicholas Lansma
Page 9: Liz Hartley, Head of Editorial Lega
Page 13 and 14: Rt Hon Dominic Grieve QC MP, Attorn
Page 25 and 26: BBC—Written evidence BBC—Writte
Page 27 and 28: BBC—Written evidence burden to fa
Page 29 and 30: BBC—Written evidence Section 2. H
Page 31 and 32: BBC—Written evidence outweigh any
Page 33 and 34: BBC—Written evidence cases a lack
Page 35 and 36: Mr Justice Baker and The Rt Hon. Si
Page 37 and 38: Professor Steven Barnett—Written
Page 47 and 48: Monica Bhogal and Rachel Donoghue,
Page 55 and 56: Professor Anthony Bradley QC8F —W
Page 57 and 58: Professor Anthony Bradley QC8F —W
Page 59 and 60: Professor Anthony Bradley QC, David
Page 61 and 62:
Professor Anthony Bradley QC, David
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Alastair Brett—Written evidence f
Page 81 and 82:
Alastair Brett—Written evidence o
Page 83 and 84:
Alastair Brett—Written evidence
Page 85 and 86:
British Sky Broadcasting Limited (
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Mark Burby—Written evidence Mark
Page 93 and 94:
Mark Burby—Written evidence (4) i
Page 95 and 96:
Mark Burby—Written evidence appli
Page 97 and 98:
Mark Burby—Written evidence raise
Page 99 and 100:
Mark Burby—Written evidence (b) T
Page 101 and 102:
Mark Burby—Written evidence they
Page 103 and 104:
Mark Burby—Written evidence Enfor
Page 105 and 106:
Mark Burby—Written evidence the p
Page 107 and 108:
Mark Burby—Supplementary written
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Archerfield Partners LLP—Written
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Carter-Ruck Solicitors—Written ev
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Carter-Ruck Solicitors—Supplement
Page 147 and 148:
Professor Brian Cathcart—Written
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Channel 4—Written evidence Channe
Page 157 and 158:
Channel 4—Written evidence In Cha
Page 159 and 160:
Prash Naik, Controller of Legal & C
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Channel 5—Written evidence 5. Sho
Page 181 and 182:
Chartered Institute of Journalists
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
James and Margaret Watson—Written
Page 191 and 192:
Robert Rogers, Clerk of the House o
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
David Beamish, Clerk of the Parliam
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Peter Cohen—Written evidence part
Page 235 and 236:
Peter Cohen—Written evidence appl
Page 237 and 238:
Peter Cohen—Written evidence Acco
Page 239 and 240:
Peter Cohen—Written evidence He w
Page 241 and 242:
Peter Cohen—Written evidence ordi
Page 243 and 244:
Peter Cohen—Written evidence Appe
Page 245 and 246:
195HDepartment for Culture, Media a
Page 247 and 248:
Viscount Rothermere, chairman, Dail
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
Page 255 and 256:
Page 257 and 258:
Page 259 and 260:
Page 261 and 262:
Page 263 and 264:
Page 265 and 266:
Page 267 and 268:
Page 269 and 270:
Charles Garside, Assistant Editor,
Page 271 and 272:
Paul Farrelly MP—Written evidence
Page 273 and 274:
Charles Garside, Assistant Editor,
Page 275 and 276:
Richard Wallace, editor, Daily Mirr
Page 277 and 278:
Dr David Erdos—Written evidence D
Page 279 and 280:
Dr David Erdos—Written evidence p
Page 281 and 282:
Dr David Erdos—Written evidence s
Page 283 and 284:
Dr David Erdos—Written evidence o
Page 285 and 286:
Dr David Erdos—Written evidence w
Page 287 and 288:
Terence Ewing—Written evidence Te
Page 289 and 290:
Terence Ewing—Written evidence Pr
Page 291 and 292:
Terence Ewing—Written evidence ov
Page 293 and 294:
Terence Ewing—Written evidence 66
Page 295 and 296:
Page 297 and 298:
Page 299 and 300:
Page 301 and 302:
Facebook, Google, and Twitter—Ora
Page 303 and 304:
Page 305 and 306:
Page 307 and 308:
Page 309 and 310:
Page 311 and 312:
Page 313 and 314:
Page 315 and 316:
Page 317 and 318:
Page 319 and 320:
Page 321 and 322:
Page 323 and 324:
Page 325 and 326:
Foot Anstey LLP—Written evidence
Page 327 and 328:
Professor Chris Frost—Written evi
Page 329 and 330:
Professor Chris Frost—Written evi
Page 331 and 332:
Global Witness—Written evidence G
Page 333 and 334:
Global Witness—Written evidence 8
Page 335 and 336:
Zac Goldsmith MP, Max Mosley, Steve
Page 337 and 338:
Lord Grabiner QC and Dr Kirsty Hugh
Page 339 and 340:
Page 341 and 342:
Page 343 and 344:
Page 345 and 346:
Page 347 and 348:
Page 349 and 350:
Page 351 and 352:
Page 353 and 354:
Page 355 and 356:
Page 357 and 358:
Page 359 and 360:
Page 361 and 362:
Page 363 and 364:
Page 365 and 366:
Page 367 and 368:
Hugh Grant—Written evidence 9) An
Page 369 and 370:
Hugh Grant—Written evidence singe
Page 371 and 372:
Hugh Grant, Max Mosley, Steve Cooga
Page 373 and 374:
Jonathan Grun, Press Association—
Page 375 and 376:
Guardian News and Media Limited (GN
Page 377 and 378:
Page 379 and 380:
Page 381 and 382:
Alan Rusbridger, Editor, The Guardi
Page 383 and 384:
Page 385 and 386:
Page 387 and 388:
Page 389 and 390:
Page 391 and 392:
Page 393 and 394:
Page 395 and 396:
Page 397 and 398:
Page 399 and 400:
Page 401 and 402:
Alex Hall—Written Evidence Alex H
Page 403 and 404:
Alex Hall and Charlotte Harris, par
Page 405 and 406:
Page 407 and 408:
Page 409 and 410:
Page 411 and 412:
Page 413 and 414:
Page 415 and 416:
Page 417 and 418:
Page 419 and 420:
Page 421 and 422:
Page 423 and 424:
Page 425 and 426:
Page 427 and 428:
Phil Hall, chairman, PHA Media and
Page 429 and 430:
Page 431 and 432:
Page 433 and 434:
Page 435 and 436:
Page 437 and 438:
Page 439 and 440:
Page 441 and 442:
Page 443 and 444:
Page 445 and 446:
Page 447 and 448:
David Howarth138F —Written eviden
Page 449 and 450:
David Howarth138F —Written eviden
Page 451 and 452:
David Howarth, Professor Anthony Br
Page 453 and 454:
Chris Blackhurst, editor, The Indep
Page 455 and 456:
Page 457 and 458:
Page 459 and 460:
Page 461 and 462:
Page 463 and 464:
Page 465 and 466:
Page 467 and 468:
Page 469 and 470:
Page 471 and 472:
ITN—Written evidence ITN—Writte
Page 473 and 474:
ITN—Written evidence The experien
Page 475 and 476:
ITN—Written evidence 9. Should Of
Page 477 and 478:
ITV—Written evidence ITV—Writte
Page 479 and 480:
ITV—Written evidence There are ex
Page 481 and 482:
ITV—Written evidence Given the ex
Page 483 and 484:
Andreas Kolbe and Dr Edward Buckner
Page 485 and 486:
Page 487 and 488:
Page 489 and 490:
Page 491 and 492:
Page 493 and 494:
Page 495 and 496:
Law Society—Written evidence Law
Page 497 and 498:
Law Society—Written evidence Ques
Page 499 and 500:
Law Society—Written evidence •
Page 501 and 502:
Law Society—Written evidence inte
Page 503 and 504:
Page 505 and 506:
Page 507 and 508:
Lawyers for Media Standards—Writt
Page 509 and 510:
Page 511 and 512:
Page 513 and 514:
Page 515 and 516:
Lord Lester of Herne Hill QC—Writ
Page 517 and 518:
Page 519 and 520:
Page 521 and 522:
Page 523 and 524:
Page 525 and 526:
Page 527 and 528:
Page 529 and 530:
Page 531 and 532:
Page 533 and 534:
Page 535 and 536:
Page 537 and 538:
Page 539 and 540:
Page 541 and 542:
Lewis Silkin LLP—Written evidence
Page 543 and 544:
Page 545 and 546:
Page 547 and 548:
Page 549 and 550:
Page 551 and 552:
Peter Wright, editor, Mail on Sunda
Page 553 and 554:
Martin Clarke, publisher, Mail Onli
Page 555 and 556:
Page 557 and 558:
Page 559 and 560:
Page 561 and 562:
Page 563 and 564:
Page 565 and 566:
Page 567 and 568:
Page 569 and 570:
Page 571 and 572:
Page 573 and 574:
Page 575 and 576:
Page 577 and 578:
Page 579 and 580:
Mr Andrew Marr—Written evidence r
Page 581 and 582:
Sir William McKay—Written evidenc
Page 583 and 584:
Sir William McKay—Written evidenc
Page 585 and 586:
Sir William McKay KCB, David Howart
Page 587 and 588:
Media Standards Trust—Written evi
Page 589 and 590:
Page 591 and 592:
Page 593 and 594:
Page 595 and 596:
Page 597 and 598:
Sir Christopher Meyer, Martin Moore
Page 599 and 600:
Page 601 and 602:
Page 603 and 604:
Page 605 and 606:
Page 607 and 608:
Page 609 and 610:
Page 611 and 612:
Page 613 and 614:
Page 615 and 616:
Page 617 and 618:
Peter Milledge, Deputy Counsel to t
Page 619 and 620:
Ministry of Justice and Department
Page 621 and 622:
Page 623 and 624:
Page 625 and 626:
Page 627 and 628:
Page 629 and 630:
Page 631 and 632:
Page 633 and 634:
Page 635 and 636:
Page 637 and 638:
Page 639 and 640:
Page 641 and 642:
Page 643 and 644:
Page 645 and 646:
Page 647 and 648:
Page 649 and 650:
Page 651 and 652:
Page 653 and 654:
Page 655 and 656:
Page 657 and 658:
Page 659 and 660:
Page 661 and 662:
Page 663 and 664:
Page 665 and 666:
Rt Hon Kenneth Clarke QC MP, Lord C
Page 667 and 668:
Page 669 and 670:
Page 671 and 672:
Page 673 and 674:
Page 675 and 676:
Page 677 and 678:
Page 679 and 680:
Page 681 and 682:
Page 683 and 684:
Page 685 and 686:
Page 687 and 688:
Page 689 and 690:
Max Mosley—Written evidence Max M
Page 691 and 692:
Max Mosley—Written evidence No. A
Page 693 and 694:
Max Mosley—Written evidence 3. Is
Page 695 and 696:
Max Mosley—Written evidence It ha
Page 697 and 698:
Max Mosley—Written evidence The r
Page 699 and 700:
Max Mosley, Steve Coogan, Zac Golds
Page 701 and 702:
Page 703 and 704:
Page 705 and 706:
Page 707 and 708:
Page 709 and 710:
Page 711 and 712:
Page 713 and 714:
Page 715 and 716:
Page 717 and 718:
Page 719 and 720:
Page 721 and 722:
Page 723 and 724:
get us started. What positives and
Page 725 and 726:
at here is that you, as the UK Parl
Page 727 and 728:
Q547 Mr Bradshaw: Is that a free sp
Page 729 and 730:
Ashley Van Haeften: Can I pick up o
Page 731 and 732:
Nicholas Lansman: Well, there is a
Page 733 and 734:
substantive law. The issue is that
Page 735 and 736:
then under an obligation to take it
Page 737 and 738:
Q572 Ms Stuart: Just before you get
Page 739 and 740:
legislation can happily apply to th
Page 741 and 742:
National Union of Journalists (NUJ)
Page 743 and 744:
Page 745 and 746:
Page 747 and 748:
Page 749 and 750:
The Rt Hon. the Lord Neuberger of A
Page 751 and 752:
Page 753 and 754:
Page 755 and 756:
Page 757 and 758:
Page 759 and 760:
Page 761 and 762:
Page 763 and 764:
Page 765 and 766:
Page 767 and 768:
Page 769 and 770:
Page 771 and 772:
Richard Caseby, Group Managing Edit
Page 773 and 774:
Page 775 and 776:
Page 777 and 778:
Page 779 and 780:
Page 781 and 782:
Page 783 and 784:
Page 785 and 786:
Page 787 and 788:
Page 789 and 790:
Page 791 and 792:
Page 793 and 794:
Page 795 and 796:
Page 797 and 798:
The Newspaper Society—Written evi
Page 799 and 800:
Page 801 and 802:
Page 803 and 804:
Page 805 and 806:
Page 807 and 808:
Page 809 and 810:
Richard Desmond, chairman, Northern
Page 811 and 812:
Page 813 and 814:
Page 815 and 816:
Page 817 and 818:
Page 819 and 820:
Page 821 and 822:
Page 823 and 824:
Page 825 and 826:
Page 827 and 828:
Page 829 and 830:
Page 831 and 832:
Paul Ashford, Editorial Director, N
Page 833 and 834:
Open Digital Policy Organisation—
Page 835 and 836:
Open Digital Policy Organisation—
Page 837 and 838:
Professor Julian Petley—Written e
Page 839 and 840:
Page 841 and 842:
Page 843 and 844:
Page 845 and 846:
Page 847 and 848:
Professor Gavin Phillipson, The Rt
Page 849 and 850:
Professor Gavin Phillipson—Writte
Page 851 and 852:
Page 853 and 854:
Page 855 and 856:
Page 857 and 858:
Page 859 and 860:
Press Complaints Commission—Writt
Page 861 and 862:
Page 863 and 864:
Page 865 and 866:
Page 867 and 868:
Page 869 and 870:
Page 871 and 872:
Page 873 and 874:
Page 875 and 876:
Page 877 and 878:
Page 879 and 880:
Page 881 and 882:
Page 883 and 884:
Page 885 and 886:
Page 887 and 888:
Page 889 and 890:
Page 891 and 892:
Page 893 and 894:
Page 895 and 896:
Page 897 and 898:
Page 899 and 900:
Page 901 and 902:
Page 903 and 904:
Page 905 and 906:
Page 907 and 908:
Page 909 and 910:
Page 911 and 912:
Page 913 and 914:
Page 915 and 916:
Page 917 and 918:
Page 919 and 920:
Page 921 and 922:
Page 923 and 924:
Page 925 and 926:
Page 927 and 928:
Page 929 and 930:
Page 931 and 932:
Page 933 and 934:
Page 935 and 936:
Page 937 and 938:
Page 939 and 940:
Page 941 and 942:
Page 943 and 944:
Page 945 and 946:
Page 947 and 948:
Press Complaints Commission, Ofcom,
Page 949 and 950:
Page 951 and 952:
Page 953 and 954:
Page 955 and 956:
Page 957 and 958:
Page 959 and 960:
Page 961 and 962:
Page 963 and 964:
Page 965 and 966:
Page 967 and 968:
Lord Hunt of Wirral, Chair, Press C
Page 969 and 970:
Page 971 and 972:
Page 973 and 974:
Page 975 and 976:
Page 977 and 978:
Page 979 and 980:
Page 981 and 982:
Page 983 and 984:
David Price QC, Gavin Millar QC, Gi
Page 985 and 986:
Page 987 and 988:
Page 989 and 990:
Page 991 and 992:
Page 993 and 994:
Page 995 and 996:
Page 997 and 998:
Page 999 and 1000:
Page 1001 and 1002:
Page 1003 and 1004:
Ian Hislop, Editor, Private Eye, Al
Page 1005 and 1006:
Ian Hislop, Editor, Private Eye—S
Page 1007 and 1008:
Ian Hislop, Editor, Private Eye—S
Page 1009 and 1010:
Professional Negligence Lawyers’
Page 1011 and 1012:
Page 1013 and 1014:
Page 1015 and 1016:
The Professional Negligence Lawyers
Page 1017 and 1018:
Joshua Rozenberg, Professor Steven
Page 1019 and 1020:
Page 1021 and 1022:
Page 1023 and 1024:
Page 1025 and 1026:
Page 1027 and 1028:
Page 1029 and 1030:
Page 1031 and 1032:
Page 1033 and 1034:
Page 1035 and 1036:
Page 1037 and 1038:
Schillings—Written evidence Schil
Page 1039 and 1040:
Schillings—Written evidence the B
Page 1041 and 1042:
Schillings—Written evidence provi
Page 1043 and 1044:
Schillings—Written evidence carri
Page 1045 and 1046:
Schillings—Written evidence Damag
Page 1047 and 1048:
Schillings—Written evidence We be
Page 1049 and 1050:
Schillings—Written evidence • S
Page 1051 and 1052:
Schillings, Carter Ruck Solicitors,
Page 1053 and 1054:
Dr Andrew Scott—Written evidence
Page 1055 and 1056:
Page 1057 and 1058:
Page 1059 and 1060:
Page 1061 and 1062:
Page 1063 and 1064:
Page 1065 and 1066:
The Rt Hon. Sir Stephen Sedley, The
Page 1067 and 1068:
Society of Editors—Written eviden
Page 1069 and 1070:
Society of Editors—Written eviden
Page 1071 and 1072:
Bob Satchwell, Executive Director,
Page 1073 and 1074:
Paul Staines, Jamie East, David All
Page 1075 and 1076:
Page 1077 and 1078:
Page 1079 and 1080:
Page 1081 and 1082:
Page 1083 and 1084:
Page 1085 and 1086:
Page 1087 and 1088:
Page 1089 and 1090:
Page 1091 and 1092:
Page 1093 and 1094:
Page 1095 and 1096:
The Rt Hon. Jack Straw MP, The Rt H
Page 1097 and 1098:
Page 1099 and 1100:
Page 1101 and 1102:
Page 1103 and 1104:
Page 1105 and 1106:
Page 1107 and 1108:
Page 1109 and 1110:
Page 1111 and 1112:
Page 1113 and 1114:
Page 1115 and 1116:
Page 1117 and 1118:
Page 1119 and 1120:
Richard Walker, Editor, Sunday Hera
Page 1121 and 1122:
Page 1123 and 1124:
Page 1125 and 1126:
Page 1127 and 1128:
Page 1129 and 1130:
Page 1131 and 1132:
Page 1133 and 1134:
Page 1135 and 1136:
Page 1137 and 1138:
Page 1139 and 1140:
Page 1141 and 1142:
Matt McKenzie, Editor The Sunday Su
Page 1143 and 1144:
Edward Roussel, Digital Editor, Tel
Page 1145 and 1146:
Philip Webster, Editor, Times Onlin
Page 1147 and 1148:
James Harding, editor, The Times, P
Page 1149 and 1150:
Page 1151 and 1152:
Page 1153 and 1154:
Page 1155 and 1156:
Page 1157 and 1158:
Page 1159 and 1160:
Page 1161 and 1162:
John Witherow, Editor, The Sunday T
Page 1163 and 1164:
Hugh Tomlinson QC—Written evidenc
Page 1165 and 1166:
Page 1167 and 1168:
Page 1169 and 1170:
Page 1171 and 1172:
Hugh Tomlinson QC, Schillings, and
Page 1173 and 1174:
Page 1175 and 1176:
Page 1177 and 1178:
Page 1179 and 1180:
Page 1181 and 1182:
Page 1183 and 1184:
Page 1185 and 1186:
Page 1187 and 1188:
Page 1189 and 1190:
Trinity Mirror plc, and Richard Wal
Page 1191 and 1192:
Page 1193 and 1194:
Page 1195 and 1196:
Page 1197 and 1198:
Page 1199 and 1200:
Page 1201 and 1202:
Page 1203 and 1204:
Page 1205 and 1206:
Page 1207 and 1208:
Page 1209 and 1210:
Marcus Partington, Trinity Mirror P
Page 1211 and 1212:
Twitter, Facebook, and Google—Ora
Page 1213 and 1214:
The Rt Hon. Lord Wakeham, The Rt Ho
Page 1215 and 1216:
The Rt Hon. the Lord Wakeham DL—W
Page 1217 and 1218:
The Rt Hon. Sir Nicholas Wall and M
Page 1219 and 1220:
Page 1221 and 1222:
Page 1223 and 1224:
Page 1225 and 1226:
Page 1227 and 1228:
Page 1229 and 1230:
Page 1231 and 1232:
Richard Wilson—Supplementary writ
Page 1233 and 1234:
Page 1235 and 1236:
Page 1237 and 1238:
Withers LLP—Written evidence This
Page 1239 and 1240:
Withers LLP—Written evidence prop
Page 1241:
Withers LLP—Written evidence The
show all

Privacy and Injunctions - Evidence - Parliament

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?