05.06.2013 Views

Privacy and Injunctions - Evidence - Parliament

Privacy and Injunctions - Evidence - Parliament

Privacy and Injunctions - Evidence - Parliament

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Facebook, Google, <strong>and</strong> Twitter—Oral evidence (QQ 1384–1455)<br />

Q1386 Nadhim Zahawi: Do your organisations use personal private information<br />

for commercial purposes?<br />

Lord Allan of Hallam: To underst<strong>and</strong> how Facebook works: our service is free at<br />

the point of use <strong>and</strong> is funded by advertising, which is targeted. For example, if you run a<br />

bicycle shop in London, you can target men aged between 30 <strong>and</strong> 40 in London who like<br />

cycling with a particular model of bicycle. The personal information on people’s profiles<br />

tells us that they live in London; that they are of that age; <strong>and</strong> that they like cycling. The<br />

advertiser does not get a list of those people; he simply gets a contract with us that says we<br />

will show his advertisement to that group of people. The personal information is part of<br />

that advertising model, but that model is absolutely not about selling that personal<br />

information or sharing it with third parties.<br />

Q1387 Nadhim Zahawi: So, you do use it for that model to work?<br />

Lord Allan of Hallam: It is used to support that model, which I think is widely<br />

understood. We recently had an audit by the Irish Data Protection Commissioner. He is<br />

the auditor for our operations in Europe. He was quite clear that that kind of model of<br />

advertising-funded internet services, on the basis you are not selling the personal data but<br />

simply using them to generate an efficient advertising model, was a reasonable offering to<br />

our users. We are very explicit in all of our terms of service that that is precisely what we<br />

are doing.<br />

Colin Crowell: Twitter is very similar. We use the information internally to render<br />

service <strong>and</strong> continue to try to improve Twitter.<br />

Q1388 Nadhim Zahawi: Does Twitter use the behavioural information, or just<br />

the private information?<br />

Colin Crowell: We use the information only internally to render <strong>and</strong> deliver the<br />

tweets for the purposes of our advertising products. We are able to see, for example,<br />

whether a promoted tweet is being clicked on frequently. That tells us whether or not to<br />

serve that to more people, but we do not disclose or otherwise share that personal<br />

information with advertisers.<br />

Q1389 Nadhim Zahawi: But do you use the way people behave, in that you<br />

monitor how they are looking at stuff?<br />

Colin Crowell: Not as individuals. Our service is a publicly rendered one <strong>and</strong> whom<br />

you follow is publicly displayed, so it is on the basis of whom you follow, not who you are as<br />

an individual.<br />

DJ Collins: If I may answer for Google, there are a couple of safeguards for users<br />

that we’ve built in. For example, we have a product called the Ads Preference Manager.<br />

You can see for yourself what we think you might be interested in. It is a series of guesses<br />

on our part. You can either change those assumptions or you can say actually, I do not<br />

want to be served any at all, so there is a high degree of control for the user. I just wanted<br />

302

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!