05.06.2013 Views

Privacy and Injunctions - Evidence - Parliament

Privacy and Injunctions - Evidence - Parliament

Privacy and Injunctions - Evidence - Parliament

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ITV—Written evidence<br />

Has privacy regulation ever restricted your ability to report on particular issues<br />

which you would otherwise have reported?<br />

Not significantly. The regulatory framework within which we operate has not prevented us<br />

from reporting on any issue of public interest. It goes without saying that there are daily<br />

difficult <strong>and</strong> challenging judgement calls to be made in the area of privacy, but we see this as<br />

a natural consequence of the responsibilities we have as a public service broadcaster with a<br />

licence to broadcast into living rooms throughout the country.<br />

In recent years ITV has carried out many successful investigative programmes, sometimes<br />

involving some degree of infringement of privacy, for example with covert filming, which has<br />

been warranted given the public interest in the subject matter. We have very rarely been<br />

subject to applications for pre-broadcast injunctions, despite the fact that, unlike<br />

newspapers, we are obliged by the Code to give programme subjects timely notice of<br />

allegations being made about them.<br />

Are you happy with the Ofcom rules <strong>and</strong> practices in this area? Should any of<br />

them be revised or redrafted? How does Ofcom interpret <strong>and</strong> apply its privacy<br />

code?<br />

Broadly, yes. The Code rehearses examples of public interest, which set a high bar for the<br />

justification of infringements of privacy, but we do not feel that the right of freedom of<br />

expression is unreasonably fettered in this regard. Inevitably we may not always agree with<br />

the regulator when it makes findings on privacy, but largely we believe this is an area where<br />

Ofcom has shown a proper regard for the need to balance Article 8 <strong>and</strong> 10 rights. In any<br />

privacy case, much will turn on the specific facts <strong>and</strong> circumstances, <strong>and</strong> public interest<br />

cannot usefully be reduced to an exhaustive list. However, Ofcom’s Code is sufficiently<br />

clear <strong>and</strong> consistent enough for broadcasters to underst<strong>and</strong> their obligations <strong>and</strong> to ensure<br />

they broadcast compliant news, current affairs <strong>and</strong> factual programmes.<br />

Furthermore, Ofcom consults regularly on updating the Code to reflect developments in the<br />

law <strong>and</strong> public attitudes.<br />

Ofcom’s procedures for the h<strong>and</strong>ling of complaints <strong>and</strong> consideration of sanctions have<br />

recently been streamlined, <strong>and</strong> now offer broadcasters no formal appeal or review of<br />

decisions (other than judicial review). Notwithst<strong>and</strong>ing this, we do not have serious<br />

concerns about the way Ofcom has h<strong>and</strong>led privacy complaints or applies the Code in this<br />

area.<br />

Historically ITV has not had its own equivalent to the BBC Editorial Guidelines or the<br />

Independent Producer’s H<strong>and</strong>book produced by Channels 4 <strong>and</strong> 5. It does however have a<br />

number of internal policy <strong>and</strong> guidance documents, but the bedrock of these documents<br />

remains the Code.<br />

478

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!