05.06.2013 Views

Privacy and Injunctions - Evidence - Parliament

Privacy and Injunctions - Evidence - Parliament

Privacy and Injunctions - Evidence - Parliament

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Phil Hall, chairman, PHA Media <strong>and</strong> former editor of the News of the World <strong>and</strong> Hello! <strong>and</strong><br />

Max Clifford, Max Clifford Associates Ltd—Oral evidence (QQ 1456–1510)<br />

this particular incident <strong>and</strong> a newspaper decided to run it. One phone call to the Press<br />

Complaints Commission <strong>and</strong> the story was stopped. They will act as an arbiter. For me, the<br />

biggest problem, as in Max Mosley’s case, is not getting proper advance notice that<br />

something is happening. I have a slightly different view on privacy injunctions. I think that to<br />

an extent they were working. At the beginning it was crazy, but judges started to change the<br />

rules <strong>and</strong> say, “You must give proper notice to each side”, so effectively you had a<br />

newspaper saying, “This story is in the public interest”, <strong>and</strong> the individual saying, “No, it’s<br />

not”, <strong>and</strong> at last there was somebody in the middle saying, “I will now give you a ruling on<br />

whether or not I think it is fair.” To a certain extent it is moving forward. There are<br />

different ways of stopping stories.<br />

Q1480 Baroness Bonham-Carter of Yarnbury: Lord Dobbs mentioned that he<br />

had appeared on a chat show with you, Mr Clifford. To a certain extent you have made a<br />

living out of celebrities, <strong>and</strong> I suggest that you are a celebrity in your own right. Kelvin<br />

MacKenzie said the other day that he felt in some way intruded upon. Have you ever found<br />

yourself at the end of an attempt by, say, Mr Hall to look into your life, <strong>and</strong> what was your<br />

reaction to that?<br />

Max Clifford: My reaction to that is basically the way I have lived my life. I would<br />

take care of myself. If I am up to no good <strong>and</strong> somebody is about to find out, I would do<br />

everything I can to make sure they do not find out.<br />

Q1481 Baroness Bonham Carter of Yarnbury: I expected that answer. Do<br />

you think that the laws we have are good enough to protect those who are not Max<br />

Clifford?<br />

Max Clifford: No.<br />

Q1482 Baroness Bonham-Carter of Yarnbury: Did your relationship with<br />

editors mean that it was respected?<br />

Phil Hall: One thing editors do make a judgment call about is whether a story is<br />

proportionate <strong>and</strong> justifiable. If you have a bad story about Max one thing you can look at is<br />

a trail of charity work, good will <strong>and</strong> stuff he has done over the years. That happens all the<br />

time. People say that so-<strong>and</strong>-so has done such-<strong>and</strong>-such a terrible thing, <strong>and</strong> you say that it<br />

is one little mistake in their life. The stories that newspapers run tend to be when people<br />

are trying to portray themselves as something they are not. The public interest kicks in<br />

when a particular football star is saying he wants a million-pound contract because he is<br />

whiter than white <strong>and</strong> actually he is not.<br />

Q1483 Baroness Bonham-Carter of Yarnbury: You are saying it is a bartering<br />

system?<br />

Phil Hall: There is, because it is a judgment call. There is no statutory detail about<br />

what you <strong>and</strong> cannot do.<br />

434

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!