05.06.2013 Views

Privacy and Injunctions - Evidence - Parliament

Privacy and Injunctions - Evidence - Parliament

Privacy and Injunctions - Evidence - Parliament

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Press Complaints Commission, Ofcom, <strong>and</strong> Authority for Television on Dem<strong>and</strong>—Oral<br />

evidence (QQ 754–818)<br />

Q754 Ms Stuart: Are you able to tell us how many times the privacy clause <strong>and</strong><br />

the relevant codes have been breached in the past couple of years, <strong>and</strong> whether or<br />

not the number of privacy complaints have gone up in the last few years? It is just to<br />

give us an indication of how much activity there is <strong>and</strong> whether there has been<br />

movement in it.<br />

Tony Close: We receive on average each year about 200 fairness <strong>and</strong> privacy<br />

complaints. We tend not to distinguish them. The numbers have been fairly static over the<br />

last five years with no discernible trends up or down. Of those 200 cases, about 60% fall at<br />

the first hurdle, with no case to answer at the outset. This year we have found breaches in<br />

10 privacy cases, <strong>and</strong> for the four years prior to that we had roughly five or six privacy<br />

breaches per year.<br />

Q755 Ms Stuart: Have there been any changes in the reasons why they failed at<br />

the first hurdle, or has that pattern also been consistent?<br />

Tony Close: I think that pattern is fairly consistent. There is a statutory hurdle that<br />

complainants have to get over in order for us to take a complaint forward. They have to<br />

make out a sustainable case at the outset, <strong>and</strong> the numbers have been fairly consistent.<br />

Steven Abell: We receive 500 or 600 complaints a year that touch on privacy in<br />

some way or another; that is, all aspects of the Editors’ Code of Practice that relate to<br />

privacy. Of those, in about 180 to 200 cases we find a breach, or a likely breach, of the<br />

code, so it is a similar amount; it is two in five. Maybe a little more than 60% fall away very<br />

early on, but in two out of five of the cases that come to us we get some sort of remedy in<br />

the area of privacy. The number of complaints about privacy have increased in a similar way<br />

to how they have increased overall. Complaints to the PCC over the last five to 10 years<br />

have increased considerably, in part due to a greater awareness of what we do <strong>and</strong> an effort<br />

on our part to get known.<br />

Q756 Ms Stuart: Has there been no change in pattern as to whether they have<br />

been successful or have failed?<br />

Steven Abell: I suspect that the number of cases we have upheld in which no remedy<br />

has been offered by a newspaper has not increased because more newspapers now offer<br />

more remedies than they did five years ago. Therefore, the practice of settling complaints<br />

<strong>and</strong> obtaining a remedy for a complainant has probably increased slightly, but it is a broadly<br />

similar picture across the board.<br />

Pete Johnson: The statutory requirements in force in relation to on-dem<strong>and</strong><br />

programme services do not cover privacy at all, but of the 400 complaints we have had on all<br />

issues over the year or so we have been h<strong>and</strong>ling complaints in this area, not one has<br />

concerned an issue of privacy.<br />

Q757 Lord Boateng: Why do you think some people, for instance the McCanns,<br />

choose to go straight to legal action rather than take action through either the PCC or,<br />

where relevant, Ofcom?<br />

947

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!