05.06.2013 Views

Privacy and Injunctions - Evidence - Parliament

Privacy and Injunctions - Evidence - Parliament

Privacy and Injunctions - Evidence - Parliament

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Press Complaints Commission—Written evidence<br />

• Forres Gazette<br />

• Strathspey <strong>and</strong> Badenoch Herald<br />

• Newsquest North <strong>and</strong> East London<br />

33. In addition to bespoke training seminars for individual titles or groups, the<br />

Commission organises meetings from time to time about particular topics, including<br />

privacy issues. Earlier this year the PCC, in conjunction with the Office of the<br />

Information Commissioner, held a session with senior, national newspaper executives<br />

to discuss the requirements of the Code of Practice <strong>and</strong> the Data Protection Act.<br />

34. Since debates about privacy are fast-moving, particularly in light of technological<br />

changes in the last decade, it is vital for the PCC’s effectiveness that it remains at the<br />

forefront of developments in public attitude (often going beyond its primary<br />

complaints-h<strong>and</strong>ling role). A good example is the work carried out by the<br />

Commission into questions connected to online social networking, which included<br />

commissioning an Ipsos MORI poll 366 (2008) <strong>and</strong> participating in public seminars (with<br />

the Westminster Media Forum in 2008 <strong>and</strong> the LSE-based think tank Polis in 2010 367 ),<br />

as well as setting up a sub-committee of the Commission to examine online issues on<br />

an ongoing basis 368 . This work has helped to inform PCC thinking in connection to<br />

complaints about the use of material from social networking sites. Its subsequent<br />

rulings have in turn, via PCC training sessions, dissemination of the Editors’ Codebook<br />

<strong>and</strong> other means, played a role in editorial decision-making.<br />

35. Indeed, the Commission has disseminated widely the key questions editors should<br />

consider when deciding whether to publish material that has originated from social<br />

networking sites. These questions include:<br />

• How widely available is the information?<br />

• Who uploaded the material?<br />

• What settings have been used to protect privacy?<br />

• What is the quality of the information (how personal is it; what is the context)?<br />

• What is the public interest?<br />

• How is the material presented?<br />

36. The PCC’s non-statutory basis means it has had the flexibility to respond effectively to<br />

many of the challenges thrown up by online developments, both in terms of examining<br />

complaints about newspaper websites (where remedies will often be different to<br />

those traditionally appropriate for printed errors) <strong>and</strong> in respect of setting guidelines<br />

for the h<strong>and</strong>ling by journalists of material that has originated on the internet.<br />

37. As members of the Committee will know, the PCC plays no role in the granting or<br />

enforcement of injunctions. Nonetheless, in light of concerns about a variety of<br />

contempt of court issues, the Commission has recently held a seminar for senior,<br />

366 Results of all polls commissioned by the Press Complaints Commission are available at<br />

http://www.pcc.org.uk/externalrelations/research.html.<br />

367 A report of the event co-hosted by the PCC <strong>and</strong> Polis can be read at blogs.lse.ac.uk/polis/2010.<br />

368 The Commission’s Online Working Group was set up in 2009; its members are Ian Walden, Simon Sapper, Anthony<br />

Longden <strong>and</strong> Ian MacGregor.<br />

875

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!