05.06.2013 Views

Privacy and Injunctions - Evidence - Parliament

Privacy and Injunctions - Evidence - Parliament

Privacy and Injunctions - Evidence - Parliament

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Press Complaints Commission—Written evidence<br />

Appendix One<br />

The Editors’ Code of Practice<br />

The Press Complaints Commission is charged with enforcing the following Code of Practice<br />

which was framed by the newspaper <strong>and</strong> periodical industry <strong>and</strong> was ratified by the PCC in<br />

January 2011.<br />

The Editors’ Code of Practice<br />

All members of the press have a duty to maintain the highest professional st<strong>and</strong>ards. The<br />

Code, which includes this preamble <strong>and</strong> the public interest exceptions below, sets the<br />

benchmark for those ethical st<strong>and</strong>ards, protecting both the rights of the individual <strong>and</strong> the<br />

public's right to know. It is the cornerstone of the system of self-regulation to which the<br />

industry has made a binding commitment.<br />

It is essential that an agreed code be honoured not only to the letter but in the full spirit. It<br />

should not be interpreted so narrowly as to compromise its commitment to respect the<br />

rights of the individual, nor so broadly that it constitutes an unnecessary interference with<br />

freedom of expression or prevents publication in the public interest.<br />

It is the responsibility of editors <strong>and</strong> publishers to apply the Code to editorial material in<br />

both printed <strong>and</strong> online versions of publications. They should take care to ensure it is<br />

observed rigorously by all editorial staff <strong>and</strong> external contributors, including non-journalists,<br />

in printed <strong>and</strong> online versions of publications.<br />

Editors should co-operate swiftly with the PCC in the resolution of complaints. Any<br />

publication judged to have breached the Code must print the adjudication in full <strong>and</strong> with<br />

due prominence, including headline reference to the PCC.<br />

Clause 1 (Accuracy)<br />

i) The Press must take care not to publish inaccurate, misleading or distorted information,<br />

including pictures.<br />

ii) A significant inaccuracy, misleading statement or distortion once recognised must be<br />

corrected, promptly <strong>and</strong> with due prominence, <strong>and</strong> - where appropriate - an apology<br />

published. In cases involving the Commission, prominence should be agreed with the PCC in<br />

advance.<br />

iii) The Press, whilst free to be partisan, must distinguish clearly between comment,<br />

conjecture <strong>and</strong> fact.<br />

iv) A publication must report fairly <strong>and</strong> accurately the outcome of an action for defamation<br />

to which it has been a party, unless an agreed settlement states otherwise, or an agreed<br />

statement is published.<br />

886

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!