Privacy and Injunctions - Evidence - Parliament

Lord Grabiner QC and Dr Kirsty Hughes—Written evidence
CASE DETAILS
XJA v News Group
Newspapers Ltd
KJH v HGF
Donald v Ntuli
Interim injunction sought to
restrain publication of
information claimed to be
false.
Interim injunction sought to
prohibit publication of
stolen confidential and
private information.
Allegations of blackmail.
Application for interim
injunction preventing
publication of various
categories of confidential
information concerning
claimant’s relationship with
defendant.
DATE OF
JUDGMENT
November
2010
03/12/2010 Sharp J
24/11/2010 Sharp J
363
JUDGE / COURT JUDGMENT INJUNCTION GRANTED?
Calvert-Smith J Not available.
[2010] EWHC 3174
(QB)
[2010] EWHC 3064
(QB)
April 2010 Eady J Not available.
26/04/2010 Eady J
[2010] EWHC 3543
(QB)
Interim injunction granted
to restrain publication of
certain information.
Claimant anonymised.
Consent order between
parties continuing interim
injunction until trial or
further order. Anonymity
of claimant maintained.
Interim injunction (granted
and/or upheld on three
previous occasions)
maintained until trial or
further order. Claimant
and defendant
anonymised.
Interim super-injunction
granted restraining
defendant from disclosing
existence of proceedings
and certain information.
Parties anonymised.
Terms of injunction varied
to allow defendant to
disclose information
already in the public
domain.