09.06.2013 Views

View Volume II - In Today's Catholic World

View Volume II - In Today's Catholic World

View Volume II - In Today's Catholic World

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

40. They object, eighthly,<br />

AND THEIR REFUTATION. 119<br />

the text :<br />

&quot; But<br />

of that day or<br />

time, no man knoweth, neither the angels in heaven, nor the<br />

Son, but the Father&quot; (Mark, xiii, 32). So, say they, the Son<br />

is not omniscient. Some have answered this, by saying, that the<br />

Son did not know the day of judgment as man, but only as God;<br />

but this does not meet the objection,<br />

since we know from the<br />

Scriptures, that to Christ, even as man, the fullness of knowledge<br />

&quot; And we saw the glory, the glory as it were, of<br />

was given :<br />

the only-begotten<br />

of the Father, full of grace and truth&quot; (John,<br />

i, 14) ; &quot;<br />

and : again <strong>In</strong> whom are hid all the treasures of<br />

wisdom and knowledge&quot; (Collos. ii, 3). And St. Ambrose (10),<br />

treating of this point, says :<br />

&quot; How<br />

could he be ignorant of the<br />

day of judgment, who told the hour, and the place, and the<br />

signs, and the causes of judgment.&quot; The African Church, there<br />

fore, obliged Leporius to retract, when he said, that Christ, as<br />

man, did not know the day of judgment, and he at once obeyed.<br />

&quot;We, therefore, answer, that it is said the Son did not know the<br />

day of judgment, as it would be of no use, nor fit that men should<br />

know it. This is the way in which St. Augustin explains it. We<br />

are, therefore, to conclude that the Father did not wish that<br />

the Son should make known the day, and the Son, as his Father s<br />

Legate, said in his name, he did not know it, not having received<br />

a commission from his Father to make it known.<br />

41. They object, ninthly,<br />

to the exclusion of the Son :<br />

that the Father alone is called<br />

Jesus said to him :<br />

good,<br />

&quot; And<br />

Why callest thou me good? None is good but one, that is God&quot;<br />

(Mark, x, 18). Christ, therefore, they say, confesses that he<br />

is not God. St. Ambrose (11) answers this. Christ, he says,<br />

wished to reprove the young man, who called him good, and still<br />

would not believe he was God, whereas, God alone is essentially<br />

good ; it is, says the Saint, &quot;<br />

as if our Lord should : say<br />

do not call me good, or believe me to be God.&quot;<br />

Either<br />

42. They object, tenthly, that Christ has not full power<br />

over all creatures, since he said to the mother of St. James and<br />

St. John :<br />

&quot; To sit on my right or left hand, is not mine to give<br />

you&quot; (Matt, xx, 23). We answer, it cannot be denied accord-<br />

(10) St. Ambrose, /. 5, de Fide. c. (11) St. Ambrose, /. 2, de Fide. c. 1.<br />

16, n. 204.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!