09.06.2013 Views

View Volume II - In Today's Catholic World

View Volume II - In Today's Catholic World

View Volume II - In Today's Catholic World

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

04 THE HISTORY OF HERESIES,<br />

Sees where a Dogmatical Bull was accepted, appealed against it.<br />

The appeal was, therefore, justly rejected by both the secular<br />

and Ecclesiastical authorities. <strong>In</strong> the year 1718, Cardinal de<br />

Noailles subscribed to the appeal of the Bishops, but still it was<br />

annulled by the Pope, and towards the end of the year 1718,<br />

about fifty<br />

of the Bishops of France published commandments<br />

to their Diocesans, ordering them to yield unreserved obedience<br />

to the Bull:<br />

&quot;<br />

Quippe qua) universalis est Ecclesia judicium<br />

Dogmaticum, a quo omnis appellatio est nulla&quot; (11). The defen<br />

ders of Quesnel only became more violent in their opposition to<br />

the Bishops after this, and the press groaned with their pam<br />

phlets; so in the year 1727, a Provincial Council was held at<br />

Embrun, in which the Bishop of Sens was suspended for refusing<br />

to subscribe to the Bull which was declared to be the dogmatical<br />

and unchangeable judgment of the Church, and it decided that<br />

the appeal was, ipso jure, schismatical, and of no avail. The<br />

whole proceeding there received the sanction of the Pope,<br />

Benedict X<strong>II</strong>I., and the King (12).<br />

25. The Appellants then had recourse to the lawyers of<br />

Paris, and they published a<br />

&quot;<br />

Consultum,&quot; in which they under<br />

took to invalidate the judgment of the Council, on account of<br />

several irregularities. They were then joined by twelve Bishops,<br />

who signed<br />

a letter to the King, against the Council, but he<br />

strongly censured the production, and ordered that all the<br />

Bishops should be assembled in Paris in an extraordinary<br />

Assembly, and record their opinion on the Consultum of the<br />

lawyers. On the 5th of May, 1728, the Prelates assembled, and<br />

made a representation to the King that the Consultum was not<br />

only not to the point, but that it smelt of heresy, and was in fact<br />

heretical. The King, therefore, published a particular Edict,<br />

ordering the Consultum to be set aside (13). Soon after this, in<br />

the same year, Cardinal de Noaillcs, now very far advanced in<br />

years, yielded to the admonition of Benedict X<strong>II</strong>I., and revoked<br />

his<br />

appeal, and sincerely accepted the Bull, prohibiting all his<br />

Diocesans from reading Quesnel s works. lie sent his retracta<br />

tion to the Pope, who was delighted to receive it. <strong>In</strong> about six<br />

months after, he died (14). <strong>In</strong> the year 1729, the Faculty of<br />

(11) Tour. cit. (13) Tour. cit.<br />

(1-2) Tour. cit. (14) Tour. cit.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!