09.06.2013 Views

View Volume II - In Today's Catholic World

View Volume II - In Today's Catholic World

View Volume II - In Today's Catholic World

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

358 THE HISTORY OF HEJIESIES,<br />

he was a mere creature ; but when we say he is the Son, we<br />

mean that he was produced from the substance of the Father, or<br />

that he was of the same substance as the Father, as St. Athanasius<br />

teaches : (16)<br />

&quot; Omnis films ejusdem essentiae est proprii<br />

parentis, alioquin impossibile est, ipsum<br />

verum esse filium.&quot; St.<br />

Augustin says that Christ cannot be called the Son of the Holy<br />

the <strong>In</strong><br />

Ghost, though it was by the operation of the Holy Spirit<br />

How, then, can he be the Son of the three<br />

carnation took place.<br />

Persons ? St. Thomas (17) teaches that Christ cannot be called<br />

the Son of God, unless by the eternal generation, as he has been<br />

generated by the Father alone ;<br />

but Berruyer wants us to believe<br />

that he is not the Son, generated by the Father, but made by one<br />

God, subsisting<br />

in three Persons.<br />

12 To carry out tliis if<br />

proposition,<br />

he understands that Jesus<br />

Christ is the Son, consubstantial to the Father, who subsists in<br />

three Persons, he must admit four Persons in God, that is, three<br />

in which God subsists, and the fourth Jesus Christ, made the<br />

Son of the Most Holy Trinity ; or, in other words, of God sub<br />

sisting in three Persons. If, on the other hand, he considers the<br />

Father of Jesus Christ as one person alone, then he falls into<br />

Sabellianism, recognizing in God not three distinct Persons, but<br />

one alone, under three different names. He is accused of Arian-<br />

ism by others, and, in my opinion,<br />

his error leads to Nesto-<br />

rianism. He lays down as a principle, that there are two gene<br />

rations in God one eternal, the other in time one of necessity,<br />

ad intra the other voluntary, ad extra. <strong>In</strong> all this he is quite<br />

correct ; but then, speaking of the generation in time, he says<br />

that Jesus Christ was not the natural Son of God the Father, as<br />

the first Person of the Trinity, but the Son of God, as subsisting<br />

in three Persons.<br />

13. Admitting this, then, to be the case, it follows that Jesus<br />

Christ had two Fathers, and that in Jesus Christ there are two<br />

Sons one the Son of God, as the Father, the first Person of the<br />

Trinity, who generated him from all eternity the other, the<br />

Son made in time by God, but by God subsisting<br />

in three Per<br />

sons, who, unking the humanity of Jesus Christ (or, as Berruyer<br />

says, uniting that man, hominem ilium,) to the Divine Word,<br />

(16) St. Athan. Epist. 2, ad Strapion. (17) St. Thorn. 3, p. 711, 32, art. 3.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!