09.06.2013 Views

View Volume II - In Today's Catholic World

View Volume II - In Today's Catholic World

View Volume II - In Today's Catholic World

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

AND THEIR REFUTATION. 239<br />

laudem Deo deferunt ; oratio praemittitur pro Popolo, pro<br />

Regibus, pro ceteris; ubi venitur ut conficiatur venerabile Sacramentum,<br />

jam non suis sermonibus Sacerdos, sed utitur sermonibus<br />

Christi.&quot; St. John Chrysostom (17), speaking of the<br />

same words, says :<br />

&quot; Hoc<br />

verbum Christi transformat ea, quae<br />

&quot;<br />

Dixit<br />

proposita sunt.&quot; And St. John of Damascus says :<br />

pariter Deus, Hoc est corpus meum, ideoque omnipotenti ejus<br />

praecepto, donee veniat, efficitur.&quot;<br />

49. The same Council (Cap. 3) says :<br />

&quot; Et<br />

semper haec fides<br />

in Ecclesia Dei fuit, statim post consecrationem verum Domini<br />

nostri Corpus, ver unique ejus sanguinem sub panis et vini<br />

specie existere ex vi verborum.&quot; Therefore, by the<br />

power of the words that is, the words mentioned by the Evan<br />

gelists instantly after the consecration, the bread is converted<br />

into the body, and the wine into the blood, of Jesus Christ.<br />

There is a great difference between the two sentences,<br />

my body,&quot; and &quot; We<br />

may be made for us,&quot; or, as the Greeks say,<br />

the body of Christ ;&quot;<br />

&quot;<br />

This is<br />

beseech thee that the body of Jesus Christ<br />

&quot; Make this bread<br />

for<br />

the first shows that the body of Christ<br />

is present at the very moment in which the sentence is expressed,<br />

but the second is only a simple prayer, beseeching that the<br />

oblation may be made the body, not in a determinative, but a<br />

suspended and expectative sense. The Council says that the<br />

conversion of the bread and wine into the body and blood of<br />

Christ takes place vi verborum, not vi orationum, by the power<br />

of the words, and not by the power of the prayers. St. Justin<br />

Eucharistiam confici per preces ab ipso Verbo Dei<br />

says (18) :<br />

but<br />

&quot;<br />

;&quot; profectas and he afterwards explains that these prayers are :<br />

&quot;<br />

This is ;&quot; my body<br />

the prayer in the Canon was not pro<br />

nounced by the Word of God himself. St. Iraeneus(19) says,<br />

also :<br />

&quot;<br />

Quando mixtus calix, et factus panis percipit verbum Dei,<br />

fit Eucharistia corporis Christi.&quot; We do not find that Christ, in<br />

This is my body,<br />

consecrating, used &quot;<br />

any other words but those :<br />

and this is blood.&quot; my Taking all this into consideration, we<br />

must decide that the opinion of Le Brun has not a sound founda<br />

tion of probability.<br />

50. Several Fathers (say the supporters of this opinion)<br />

(17) St. Chrisost. Horn. 1 cle Prod. (18) St. Justin, Apol. 2.<br />

Judse. 09) St. Ircn. /. 5, c. 2.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!