09.06.2013 Views

View Volume II - In Today's Catholic World

View Volume II - In Today's Catholic World

View Volume II - In Today's Catholic World

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

John<br />

&quot; The<br />

AND THEIR REFUTATION. 377<br />

Word was made flesh&quot; but was the other Son of<br />

God, made in time. This, however,<br />

is not the doctrine of the<br />

Holy Fathers ; they unanimously teach that it was the Word (17).<br />

St. Jerome writes :<br />

&quot; Anima<br />

et Caro Christi cum Verho Dei una<br />

Persona est, unus Christus&quot; (18). St. Ambrose (19), showing<br />

that Jesus Christ spoke sometimes according to his Divine, and,<br />

at other times, according to his human nature, says :<br />

&quot;<br />

Quasi<br />

homo dicit<br />

Deus sequitur Divina, quia Verbum est, quasi<br />

humana.&quot; Pope Leo says :<br />

&quot; Idem est qui mortem subiit, et<br />

Jesus<br />

sempiternus esse non desiit.&quot; St. Augustin says :<br />

&quot;<br />

Christus Dei Filius est, et Deus, et homo. Deus ante omnia<br />

secula, homo in nostro seculo. Deus quia Dei Verbum, Deus<br />

enim erat Verbum : homo autcm, quia in unitatem personse<br />

accessit Verbo Anima, et Caro Non duo Filii, Deus, et homo,<br />

sed unus Dei Filius&quot; (20). And, in another place (Cap. 36) :<br />

&quot; Ex<br />

quo homo esse ccepit, non aliud ccepit esse homo, quam Dei<br />

Filius, et hoc unicus, et propter Deum Verbum, quod<br />

illo sus-<br />

cepto caro factum est, utique Deus ut sit Christus una per<br />

sona, Verbum et homo.&quot; The rest of the Fathers speak the<br />

same sentiments ; but it would render the Work too diffuse to<br />

quote any more.<br />

35. The Holy See, then, had very good reasons for so<br />

rigorously and so frequently condemning Berruyer s Book ; for<br />

it not alone contains many errors, in opposition to the doctrines<br />

of the Church, but is, besides, most pernicious, because it makes<br />

us lose that proper idea we should have of Jesus Christ. The<br />

Church teaches that the Eternal Word that is, the only natural<br />

Son of God (for he had but one natural Son, who is, therefore,<br />

called the only-begotten, born of the substance of God the<br />

Father, the first Person of the Trinity), was made man, and died<br />

for our salvation. Berruyer, on the contrary, would have us to<br />

believe that Jesus Christ is not the Word, the Son, born of the<br />

Father from all eternity, but another Son, which only he and<br />

Hardouin knew anything about, or, rather, dreamed of, who, if<br />

their ideas were founded in fact, would have the name alone, and<br />

the honour of being called the Son of God ; for, in order that<br />

(17) St. Ilicron. Tract. 49, in Joan. (19) St. Leo, Serm. 66.<br />

(18) St. Ambr. ap. St. Leon, in Ep. (20) St. Augu. in Euchirid. c. 35.<br />

134.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!