09.06.2013 Views

View Volume II - In Today's Catholic World

View Volume II - In Today's Catholic World

View Volume II - In Today's Catholic World

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

AND THEIR REFUTATION. 321<br />

from sin, since man was created in grace ;<br />

but in a state of pure<br />

nature it would not come from sin, but from the very condition<br />

itself, in which human nature would have been created.<br />

15. They say, secondly, that God could not create a rational<br />

being with anything which would incline him to sin, as concu<br />

piscence would. We answer, that God could not create man<br />

with anything which, in itself, in se, would incline him to sin, as<br />

with a vicious habit, for example, which of itself inclines and<br />

induces one to sin; but he might create man with that which<br />

accidentally, per accidens, inclines him to sin, for in this is the<br />

condition of his nature only accomplished, for otherwise God<br />

should create man impeccable, for it is a defect to be peccable.<br />

Concupiscence, of itself, does not incline man to sin, but solely to<br />

that happiness adapted to human nature, and for the preservation<br />

of nature itself, which is composed of soul and body ; so that it is<br />

not of itself, but only accidentally, and through the deficiency of<br />

the condition of human nature itself, that it sometimes inclines<br />

us to sin. God, surely, was not obliged, when he produced his<br />

creatures, to give them greater perfections than those adapted to<br />

their natures. Because he has not given sensation to plants, or<br />

reason to brutes, we cannot say that the defect is his ; it belongs<br />

to the nature itself of these creatures, and so if, in the state of<br />

pure nature, God did not exempt man from concupiscence,<br />

which might accidentally incline him to evil, it would not be a<br />

defect of God himself, but of the condition itself of human<br />

nature.<br />

16. The third is objection on the score of the<br />

&quot;<br />

Miseries&quot; of<br />

human nature. St. Augustin, they say, when opposing the<br />

Pelagians, frequently deduced the existence of original<br />

sin from<br />

the miseries of this life. We briefly answer, that the Holy<br />

Doctor speaks of the misery of man in his present state, remem<br />

bering the original holiness in which he was created, and know<br />

ing, from the Scriptures, that Adam was created free from death<br />

and from all the penalties of this life. On this principle, God<br />

could not, with justice, deprive him of the gifts granted to him,<br />

without some positive fault on his side ; and, hence, the Saint<br />

inferred that Adam sinned, from the calamities which we endure<br />

in this life. He would say quite the contrary, however, if he<br />

were speaking of the state of pure nature, in which the miseries<br />

y

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!