09.06.2013 Views

View Volume II - In Today's Catholic World

View Volume II - In Today's Catholic World

View Volume II - In Today's Catholic World

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

316 THE HISTORY OF HERESIES,<br />

sublimatio, ct cxaltatio in consortium Divina) naturao debita fuit<br />

intcgritati primse conditionis, ct proindo naturalis dicenda cst, et<br />

non supcrnaturalis&quot; was condemned (proposition<br />

He says the same in the :<br />

fifty-fifth proposition<br />

twenty-two).<br />

&quot; Deus non<br />

potuisset ab initio talem creare homincm, qualis nunc nascitur ;&quot;<br />

that is, exclusive of sin we understand. <strong>In</strong> the seventy-ninth<br />

proposition, again ho says :<br />

&quot;<br />

Falsa est Doctorum scntentia,<br />

primum hominem et potuisse a Deo creari, et institui sine justitia<br />

naturali.&quot; Jansenius, though a strong partisan of the doctrine<br />

of Baius, confesses that those Decrees of the Pope made him<br />

very uneasy :<br />

&quot;<br />

Hserco, fateor&quot; (1).<br />

7. The disciples of Baius and Jansenius, however, say they<br />

&quot;<br />

<strong>In</strong> emincnti,&quot;<br />

have a doubt whether the Bull of Urban V<strong>II</strong>I.,<br />

should be obeyed ; but Tournelly (2) answers them, and shows<br />

that the Bull being a dogmatic law of the Apostolic See, whose<br />

authority Jansenius himself says, all <strong>Catholic</strong>s, as children of<br />

obedience, should venerate, and being accepted in the places<br />

where the controversy was agitated, and by the most celebrated<br />

Churches in the world, and tacitly admitted by all others, should<br />

bo held as an infallible judgment of the Church, which all should<br />

hold by ;<br />

and even Quesnel himself admits that.<br />

8. Our adversaries also speak of the way the Bull of St. Pius<br />

should be understood, and say, first, that we cannot believe that<br />

the Apostolic See ever intended to condemn in Baius the doctrine<br />

of St. Augustin, who, as they suppose, taught that the state of<br />

pure nature was an impossibility. This supposition of theirs,<br />

however, is totally unfounded, for the majority of Theologians<br />

assert, that the Holy Doctor in many places teaches the contrary,<br />

especially in his writings against the Manicheans (3), and dis<br />

tinguishes four modes in which God might create the souls of<br />

men blameless, and, among them, the second mode would be,<br />

if, previously to any sin being committed, these created souls<br />

were infused into their bodies subject to ignorance, concupiscence,<br />

and all the miseries of this life ; by this mode, the possibility of<br />

pure nature is certainly established. Consult Tournelly (4) on this<br />

(1) Jansen. /. 3, d. Statu. nat. pur. (3) St. August. /. 3, de lib. arb. c. 20.<br />

c. ult. (4) Tourn. t. 5, p. 2, c. 7, p. 67.<br />

(2) Comp. Thool. t.<br />

art. 3, *. 2.<br />

5, p. 1, Disp. 5,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!