09.06.2013 Views

View Volume II - In Today's Catholic World

View Volume II - In Today's Catholic World

View Volume II - In Today's Catholic World

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

146 THE HISTORY OF HERESIES,<br />

from the Son), that it has been lawfully and rationally in<br />

troduced into the Creed, for the sake of declaring the truth, and<br />

because there was a necessity for doing so at the time.&quot; Now,<br />

all those Councils in which the Greeks joined with the Latins<br />

in denning the procession of the Holy Ghost from the Father and<br />

the Son, supply an invincible argument to prove that the schis<br />

matics uphold a heresy, for otherwise we should admit that the<br />

whole united Church, both Latin and Greek, has denned an error<br />

in three General Councils.<br />

12. As to theological reasons, we have already given the two<br />

principal ones : the first is, that the Son has all that the Father<br />

has, with the exception of the Paternity alone, which is impos<br />

sible, on account of the Filiation.<br />

&quot;<br />

All<br />

things whatsoever the<br />

Father hath are mine&quot; (John, xvi, 15) ; therefore, if the Father<br />

has the power of spirating the Holy Ghost, the same power<br />

belongs also to the Son, since there is no relative opposition<br />

between the Filiation and the active spiration. The second<br />

reason is, that if the Holy Ghost did not proceed from the Son,<br />

he would not be really distinct from the Son, for then there<br />

would be no relative opposition or real distinction between them,<br />

and, consequently, the mystery of the Trinity would be destroyed.<br />

The other arguments adduced by theologians can either be re<br />

duced to these, or are arguments a congruentia, and, therefore,<br />

we omit them.<br />

n.<br />

OBJECTIONS ANSWERED.<br />

13. They object, first, that the Scripture speaks of the pro<br />

cession of the Holy Ghost from the Father alone, and not from<br />

the Son, but we have already answered this (N. 6), and we<br />

remind the reader that though the Scripture does not express it<br />

in formal, it does in equivalent terms, as has been already proved.<br />

But, besides, remember that the Greeks recognized, equally with<br />

the Latins, the authority of tradition, and that teaches that the<br />

Holy Ghost proceeds from the Father and the Son.<br />

14. They object, secondly, that in the First Council of Con-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!