09.06.2013 Views

View Volume II - In Today's Catholic World

View Volume II - In Today's Catholic World

View Volume II - In Today's Catholic World

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

AND THEIR REFUTATION. 319<br />

sin. Jansenius himself admits that it is not opposed to his<br />

Omnipotence ; neither is it to any other attribute, for in that<br />

state, as St. Augustin (6) teaches, all that is due by right to<br />

man s natural condition, as reason, liberty, and the other faculties<br />

necessary for his preservation, and the accomplishment of the<br />

object for which he was created, would be given to him by God.<br />

Besides, all Theologians, as Jansenius himself confesses in those<br />

works in which he speaks of pure nature, are agreed in admit<br />

ting the possibility of this state, that is considering the right of<br />

the creature alone, and this is precisely the doctrine of the<br />

Prince of Schoolmen, St. Thomas. He teaches (7), that man<br />

might be created without consideration to the Beatific Vision.<br />

&quot; He : says Carentia Divino visionis competeret ei qui in solis<br />

naturalibus esset etiam absque He peccato.&quot; likewise, in another<br />

passage (8), teaches that man might be created with that con<br />

cupiscence which rebels against reason :<br />

&quot;<br />

Ilia subjectio<br />

inferio<br />

rum virium ad rationem non erat naturalis.&quot; Several Theo<br />

logians, therefore, admit the possibility of the state of pure<br />

nature, as Estius, Ferrarensis, the Salmanticenses, Vega, and<br />

several others. Bellarmin (9), especially, says he does not know<br />

how any one can doubt of this opinion.<br />

13. We have now to answer the objections of our adversaries.<br />

&quot;<br />

The first is objection on the score of Beatitude.&quot; St. Augustin,<br />

according to Jansenius, teaches in several places that God<br />

could not, without injustice, deny eternal glory to man in a state<br />

of innocence :<br />

&quot;<br />

Qua justitia quaeso a Regno<br />

Dei alienatur<br />

imago Dei in nullo transgressu legem<br />

Augustin s words (10). We answer that the Holy Father in this<br />

Dei.&quot; These are St.<br />

passage was opposing the Pelagians, according to man s present<br />

ordination of man to a<br />

state, that is, supposing the gratuitous<br />

supernatural end : according to that supposition, he said that it<br />

would be unjust to deprive man of the kingdom of God if he had<br />

not sinned. Neither is it of any consequence that St. Thomas (11)<br />

says that man s desires can find no rest except in the vision of<br />

(6) St. August. /. 3, de lib. arb. (9) Bellarm. /. de Grat. primi horn.<br />

c. 20, 22, 23. cap. 5.<br />

(7) St. Thorn, qu. 4, de Malo. a. 1. (10) St. August. /. 3, contra Julian,<br />

(8) Idem in Sumiiia. 1, p. q. 95, cap. 12.<br />

art. 1. (11) St. Thorn. 1. 4, contra Gentes,<br />

c. 50.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!