09.06.2013 Views

View Volume II - In Today's Catholic World

View Volume II - In Today's Catholic World

View Volume II - In Today's Catholic World

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

296 THE HISTORY OF HERESIES,<br />

(Matt, xxviii, 19). These prelates, separately, may fall into<br />

error, and frequently disagree with each other on controverted<br />

points, and, therefore, we should receive what they tell us as<br />

infallible, and as coming from Christ himself, when they are<br />

united in Council. On this account the Holy Fathers have<br />

always considered as heretics those who contradicted the dogmas<br />

defined by General Councils, as the reader may see, by consulting<br />

St. Gregory of Nazianzen, St. Basil, St. Cyril, St. Ambrose,<br />

St. Athanasius, St. Augustin, and St. Leo (4).<br />

78. Besides all these proofs, there is another, that if General<br />

Councils could err, there would be no established tribunal in the<br />

Church, to terminate disputes about points of dogma, and to<br />

preserve the unity of the Faith, and if they were not infallible<br />

in their judgments, no heresy could be condemned, nor could we<br />

say it was a heresy at all. We could not be certain either of<br />

the canonicity of several books of the Scripture, as the Epistle<br />

of St. Paul to the Hebrews, the Second Epistle of St. Peter, the<br />

Third Epistle of St. John, the Epistles of St. James and St.<br />

Jude, and the Apocalypse of St. John ; for, although<br />

the Calvin-<br />

ists receive all these, still they are considered doubtful by others,<br />

because they were not declared canonical by the Fourth Council.<br />

Finally, we may add, that if Councils could err, they committed<br />

an intolerable error in proposing, as Articles of Faith, matters,<br />

which they could not assert were true, or false ; and thus the<br />

Creeds of Nice, of Constantinople, of Ephesus, and of Chalcedon,<br />

would fall to the ground, in which several dogmas were declared,<br />

which before were not held as such, and still these four General<br />

Councils are received as Rules of Faith by the <strong>In</strong>novators them<br />

selves. We have now to consider their numerous and importunate<br />

objections.<br />

79. First, Calvin objects (5) several passages of the Scrip<br />

tures, in which the Prophets, Priests, and Pastors, are called<br />

ignorant and liars :<br />

&quot; From the Prophet to the Priest, all deal<br />

deceitfully&quot; (Jer. viii, 10) ; &quot;His watchmen are all blind<br />

the shepherds themselves know no understanding&quot; (Isaias, Ivi,<br />

(4) St. Greg. Nazianz. Ep. ad Cledon. ; St. Basil, Ep. 78 ; St. Cyril, de<br />

Trinit. ; St. Ambr. Ep. 32; St. Athan. Ep. ad Episc. Airic. ; St. Aug. /. I, do<br />

Bapt. c. 18 ; St. Leo, Ep. 77, ad Auatol.<br />

(5) Calv. List. /. 4, c. 9, sec. 3.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!