09.06.2013 Views

View Volume II - In Today's Catholic World

View Volume II - In Today's Catholic World

View Volume II - In Today's Catholic World

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

AND THEIR REFUTATION. 57<br />

Sedes Apostolica damnavit, sincere auimo damno, ac rejicio, et<br />

ita juro, sic me Deus adjuvet, et haec sancta Evangelia.&quot; The<br />

King sanctioned it also by Royal authority, and severe penalties<br />

were imposed on the disobedient (9).<br />

15. This put the Jansenists into a quandary ; some of them<br />

said that the oath could not be taken without perjury, but others,<br />

of a more hardened conscience, said that it might, for it was<br />

enough that the person subscribing should have the intention of<br />

following the doctrine of St. Augustine, which, they said, was<br />

that of Jansenius, and as to the fact externally, it was quite<br />

enough to keep a reverent silence, and the Bishops of Alet,<br />

Pamiers, Angers, and Beauvais were of this opinion ; but under<br />

Clement XI., the successor of Alexander V<strong>II</strong>., they gave in, and<br />

consented to subscribe themselves, and oblige their subjects to<br />

subscribe the condemnation of the five propositions, without any<br />

restriction or limitation, and thus peace was re-established (10).<br />

The Jansenists, however, would not still yield ; the limitation<br />

of the religious silence was, they said, inserted in the Verbal<br />

Acts of the Diocesan Synods, and they, therefore, demanded<br />

that the silence should be approved by the Pope. <strong>In</strong> this they<br />

acted unreasonably, for the four above-mentioned Bishops were<br />

admitted to peaceable communion, on condition of signing purely,<br />

sincerely, and without any limitation whatever (11). <strong>In</strong> 1692 some<br />

other disputes arose concerning the subscription of the Formula,<br />

and the Bishops of Flanders added some other words to it, to<br />

remove every means of deception.<br />

The Louvanians complained<br />

to <strong>In</strong>nocent X<strong>II</strong>. of this addition, and he expedited two Briefs,<br />

in 1694 and 1696, removing every means of subterfuge (12).<br />

16. About the year 1702 the Jansenists again raised the<br />

point of the religious silence, by the publication of a pamphlet,<br />

in which it was said that Sacramental Absolution was denied to<br />

a Clergyman, because he asserted that he condemned the five<br />

propositions, as far as the law was concerned (jus.,) but as to the<br />

fact that they were to be found in Jansenius s book, that he con<br />

sidered it was quite enough to preserve a religious silence on that<br />

point. This was the famous Case of Conscience, on which forty<br />

Doctors of Paris decided that Absolution could not be refused to<br />

(9) Tournelly, p. 253. (11) Tournully, ibid.<br />

(10) Ibid. 226. (12) Ibid, 256.<br />

/&amp;gt;.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!