09.06.2013 Views

View Volume II - In Today's Catholic World

View Volume II - In Today's Catholic World

View Volume II - In Today's Catholic World

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

C2 THE HISTORY OF HERESIES,<br />

Tournelly (7) shows that the greater part<br />

of the Doctors and<br />

Bishops of France condemned it. They also boast that Bossuct<br />

gave it his approval, but there are several proofs, on the con<br />

trary, to show that he condemned it (8).<br />

22. When the complete work appeared in 1693, it was at<br />

once censured by Theologians, and prohibited by several Bishops,<br />

and it was condemned by a particular Brief of Pope Clement XL,<br />

in 1708. Three French Bishops prohibited it by a formal con<br />

demnation in 1711, and Cardinal de Noailles felt so mortified at<br />

seeing these Edicts published in Paris, condemning a work<br />

marked with his approbation, as heretical, that he condemned<br />

the three Edicts. This excited a great tempest in France, so<br />

the King, with the consent of several Bishops, and of Cardinal<br />

de Noailles himself, requested Pope Clement XL to cause a new<br />

examination of the work to be made, and, by a solemn Bull, to<br />

censure any errors it might contain. The Pope, then, after,<br />

two years examination by Cardinals and Theologians, published<br />

in 1713, on the 8th of September, the Bull Unigenitus Dei<br />

Films, &c., in which he condemned a hundred and ten propo<br />

sitions, extracted from the work, as false, captious, rash, erroneous,<br />

approximating to heresy, and in fine, respectively heretical, and<br />

recalling the propositions of Jansenius, in the sense in which<br />

they were condemned. The Bull, besides, declared that it was<br />

not the intention of his Holiness to approve of all else contained<br />

in the work, because while marking these hundred and ten pro<br />

positions, it declares that it contains others of a like nature, and<br />

that even the very text of the New Testament itself, was vitiated<br />

in many parts (9).<br />

23. His Most Christian Majesty, on the reception of the<br />

Bull of Clement from the Nuncio, ordered an assembly of the<br />

Bishops, to receive and promulgate it solemnly, and, in fact, after<br />

several private Conferences, the Assembly was held on the 23rd<br />

of January, 1714, and the Bull was received, together with<br />

the condemnation of the hundred and one propositions, in the<br />

same manner as the Pope had condemned them, and a form of<br />

acceptation was drawn up for all the Bishops of the kingdom,<br />

that the Bull might be everywhere promulgated, and also a For-<br />

- w- 42C &<br />

111 *

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!