09.06.2013 Views

View Volume II - In Today's Catholic World

View Volume II - In Today's Catholic World

View Volume II - In Today's Catholic World

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

274 THE HISTORY OF HERESIES,<br />

they do it through necessity, and if they are damned, it is by<br />

necessity also, for all the damned are destined to be so by God,<br />

even before their creation. This monstrous doctrine will be<br />

refuted in the next Section.<br />

49. Calvin maintains this horrible opinion by the following<br />

reasons : God never, he says, could have had the foreknowledge<br />

of the eternal happiness or misery of any of us,<br />

if he had not<br />

ordained by his decree the good or bad works we perform during<br />

&quot;<br />

our lives : Decretum quidem horribile fateor, inficiari tamen<br />

nemo poterit, quin praisciverit Deus, quern exitum esset habiturus<br />

homo ; et ideo pra3sciverit, quia decreto suo sic ordinaverat.&quot;<br />

We answer, that there is a great difference between foreseeing<br />

and predestining the sins of mankind. There is not the least<br />

doubt but that God, by his infinite intelligence, knows and com<br />

prehends every thing that will come to pass, and, among the rest,<br />

but some things he fore<br />

all the sins which each one will commit ;<br />

sees according to his positive decree; others according to his<br />

permission; but neither the Divine decree nor the permission<br />

are opposed to man s free will, for when God foresees our good<br />

or evil works, he foresees them all performed freely. The secta<br />

ries argue thus : If God has foreseen Peter s sin, for example,<br />

he cannot be mistaken as to his knowledge of what will happen<br />

when the time foreseen arrives ;<br />

therefore Peter must necessarily<br />

sin. Here they are in error, however, when they say neces<br />

sarily ; he will infallibly sin, because God has foreseen it, and<br />

cannot err in his foresight; but he will not necessarily sin,<br />

because, if he wishes to sin, he will do so of his own free will, by<br />

his own malice, and God will permit him to do so, solely not to<br />

deprive him of that free will which he gave him.<br />

50. We shall now see how many absurd consequences proceed<br />

from this sectarian doctrine. First absurdity They say that<br />

God, for his own just ends, ordains and wills the sins committed<br />

by mankind. But nothing can be clearer than the Scriptures on<br />

this point, which tell us that God not only does not wish sins, but<br />

looks on them with horror, and wishes nothing so much as our<br />

sanctification :<br />

&quot; Thou<br />

art not a God that wiliest iniquity<br />

(Psalm v, 5). &quot;To God the wicked and his wickedness are<br />

hateful alike&quot; (Wisdom, xiv, 9) ;<br />

&quot;<br />

Thy eyes are too pure to<br />

behold evil, and thou canst not look on iniquity&quot; (Habak. i, 13).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!