09.06.2013 Views

View Volume II - In Today's Catholic World

View Volume II - In Today's Catholic World

View Volume II - In Today's Catholic World

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

300 THE HISTORY OF HERESIES,<br />

tinoplc, celebrated under the Emperor Copronimus, regarding<br />

the Veneration of<br />

Images, which the Constantinopolitan Council<br />

prohibited. We answer that this Council was neither a lawful<br />

nor a General one ; it was held by only a few Bishops, without<br />

the intervention of the Pope s Legates, or of the three Patriarchs<br />

of Antioch, Alexandria, and Jerusalem, who should, according to<br />

the discipline of those times, be present.<br />

84. They object, eleventhly, that the Second Council of Nice<br />

was rejected by the Council of Frankfort. But we reply, with<br />

Bellarmin, that this was all by mistake, for the Frankfort<br />

Council supposed that it was decided in the Nicene Council,<br />

that Images should receive supreme worship (Cultus Latrice),<br />

and that it was held without the Pope s consent ; but both these<br />

suppositions were incorrect, as appears from the Acts of the<br />

Nicene Council itself. They object, twelfthly, that, in the<br />

Fourth Council of Lateran, the transubstantiation of the bread<br />

and wine into the body and blood of Christ was defined as an<br />

Article of Faith, while an anathema was fulminated by the<br />

Council of Ephesus against all who would promulgate any other<br />

Symbol besides that established by the First Council of Nice.<br />

We answer, first, that the Lateran Council did not compose any<br />

new Symbol, but merely defined the question then debated.<br />

Secondly, that the Council of Ephesus anathematized any one<br />

publishing a Symbol opposed to the Nicene one, but not a new<br />

Symbol, declaratory of some point not previously defined.<br />

They object, thirteenthly, that as in Councils the points of<br />

Faith are defined by the majority of votes, it might so happen<br />

that one vote might incline the scale to the side of error, and<br />

thus the better part be put down by the major part of the<br />

Synod. We answer that, in purely secular affairs, such might<br />

be the case, that the majority might, in a worldly meeting, put<br />

down the more worthy ; but, as the Holy Ghost presides in<br />

General Councils, and as Jesus Christ has promised, and does not<br />

fail to assist his Church, such can never be the case.<br />

85. They object, fourtcenthly, that it is the business of the<br />

but the Scripture must decide<br />

Council merely to seek the truth ;<br />

it, and hence, then, the decision does not depend on the majority<br />

of votes, but on that judgment which is most in conformity with<br />

the Scripture, and hence, say they, every one has a right to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!