morphological? - KOPS - Universität Konstanz
morphological? - KOPS - Universität Konstanz
morphological? - KOPS - Universität Konstanz
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
References<br />
Aronoff, Mark. 1994. Morphology by Itself. Cambridge: MIT Press.<br />
Aronoff, Mark. 1998. ‘Isomorphism and monotonicity’, in S. Lapointe, D. Brentari, P.<br />
Farrell (eds), Morphology and its Relation to Phonology and Syntax. Stanford, CSLI,<br />
411-18.<br />
Aronoff, Mark. 1999. ‘Le système malgré lui’, in P. Benincà, A. Mioni, L. Vanelli (eds)<br />
Fonologia e morfologia dell’italiano e dei dialetti d’Italia. Rome, Bulzoni, 321- 32.<br />
Avram, M. 1973. ‘O desinen!$ regional$ la persoana a doua singular a mai mult ca<br />
perfectului românesc’, Studii "i Cercet#ri lingvistice 24:487-92.<br />
Avram, M. 1975. ‘Despre formele de perfect simplu cu -r#- la singular’, Studii "i<br />
cercet#ri lingvistice 26:27-36.<br />
Capidan, T. 1932. Aromânii. Dialectul aromân. Studiu lingvistic. Bucarest: Academia<br />
Român$.<br />
Carstairs-McCarthy, A. 1994. ‘Inflection classes, gender, and the principle of contrast’,<br />
Language 70:737-88.<br />
Carstairs-McCarthy, A. 1998. ‘How lexical semantics constrains inflectional<br />
allomorphy’, Yearbook of Morphology 1997 1-24.<br />
Carstairs-McCarthy, A. 2001. ‘Umlaut as signans and signatum: ynchronic and<br />
diachronic aspects’, Yearbook of Morphology 2001 1-21.<br />
Cameron-Faulkner, T. and Carstairs-McCarthy, A., 2000. ‘Stem alternants as<br />
<strong>morphological</strong> signifiés: evidence from blur avoidance in Polish nouns’. In Natural<br />
Language and Linguistic Theory 18:813-35.<br />
Densu"ianu. O. 1938. Histoire de la langue roumaine. Tome II. Le seizième siècle. Paris:<br />
Leroux.<br />
Frâncu, C. 1982. ‘Vechimea formelor de mai mult ca perfect, perfect compus, prezent<br />
indicativ "i conjunctiv in -r#’, Limba român# 31:281-93.<br />
Frîncu [=Frâncu], C. 1971. ‘Din istoria perfectului simplu românesc: formele de persoana<br />
I "i a II-a plural cu sufixul -r#-’, Actele celui de-al XII-lea Congres interna!ional de<br />
lingvistic# "i filologie românic#, 12.2: 1419-23<br />
Graur, A. 1935a. ‘Une nouvelle marque de pluriel dans la flexion verbale roumaine’,<br />
Bulletin linguistique 3:178-82.<br />
Graur, A. 1935b. ‘-re et -r# facultatifs’, Bulletin linguistique 3:182-85.<br />
Graur, A. 1940. ‘La 2e pers. du plur. au passé simple’, Bulletin linguistique 8:208f.<br />
Graur, A. 1968. Tendin!ele actuale ale limbii române. Bucarest: Editura "tiin!ific$.<br />
#iadbei, I. 1930. ‘Le sort du prétérit roumain’, Romania 56:331-60.<br />
Maiden, M. (in preparation) ‘Morphophonological persistence’. The Cambridge History<br />
of the Romance Languages<br />
Maiden, M. 2000. 'Di un cambiamento intramorfologico: origini del tipo dissi dicesti<br />
ecc., nell'italoromanzo', Archivio glottologico italiano 85:137-71.<br />
Maiden, M. 2001. 'A strange affinity: perfecto y tiempos afines', Bulletin of Hispanic<br />
Studies 58:441-64.<br />
Maiden, M. 2004 ‘Perfect pedigree. The ancestry of the Aromanian conditional’. In R.<br />
Ashdowne e T. Finbow (ed.) Oxford Working Papers in Linguistics, Philology and<br />
Phonetics 9:83-98.<br />
Maiden, M. 2005. ‘Morphological autonomy and diachrony’. Yearbook of Morphology<br />
2004: 137-75.<br />
100