morphological? - KOPS - Universität Konstanz

d. Strong preterite forms (P4)
1sg 2sg 3sg 1pl 2pl 3pl
preterite supe supiste supo supimos supisteis supieron
imp. sbj. supiera supieras supiera supiéramos supierais supieran
e. Irregularities in the future (P5)
1sg 2sg 3sg 1pl 2pl 3pl
future saldré saldrás saldrá saldremos saldréis saldrán
cond. saldría saldrías saldría saldríamos saldríais saldrían
(44) Insertion of /g/ 7
Ø → /g/ / √...{//,/s/,/n/,/l/,//}# ___ P2
√ = asir, *decir, *poner, *tener, oír (/o()ir/), *salir, *valer, *venir, (yacer)
4.2 Root alternations in the strong preterite (P4)
(45) a. Preterite forms of estar ‘(to) be’, andar ‘(to) walk’ (both 1 st conjugation)
root Th endg root Th endg
1sg est uv e ∅ and uv e ∅
2sg est uv i ste and uv i ste
3sg est uv ∅ o and uv ∅ o
1pl est uv i mos and uv i mos
2pl est uv i steis and uv i steis
3pl est uv ie ron and uv ie ron
b. Preterite forms of saber ‘(to) know’ (2 nd conjugation), decir ‘(to) say’ (3 d
conjugation)
root Th endg root Th endg
1sg sup e ∅ dij e ∅
2sg sup i ste dij i ste
3sg sup ∅ o dij ∅ o
1pl sup i mos dij i mos
2pl sup i steis dij i steis
3pl sup ie ron dij ie ron
(46) Peculiarities of the verbal forms in (45) (cf. Arregi 2000:22, Oltra Massuet & Arregi
2005:61)
a. root alternation,
b. neutralisation of the conjugation classes (1 st conjugation is also affected, e.g.
anduvimos vs. *anduvamos, estuvimos vs. *estuvamos),
c. instead of the expected theme vowel -i the first person singular shows -e (compare
the regular verbal forms bebí ‘(I) drank’ (2 nd conjugation) and viví ‘(I) lived’ (3 rd
conjugation) with anduve/*anduví, estuve/*estuví, supe/*supí, dije/*dijí),
d. in the third person singular, there is no theme vowel at all (compare the regular
verbal forms bebió ‘(he) drank’ (2 nd conjugation) and vivió ‘(he) lived’ (3 rd
conjugation) with anduvo/*anduvió, estuvo/*estuvió, supo/*supió, dijo/*dijió),
7 # = roofinal; * = the verb is affected by more than one Readjustment Rule.
206