morphological? - KOPS - Universität Konstanz

More documents

Recommendations

Info

1SG 2SG 3SG 1PL 2PL 3PL The complete paradigm of mettere Pres. Ind. ["mettu] \"mettu\ ["mitti] \"metti\ ["mette] \"mette\ [m”t"timmu] \met"temmu\ [m”t"ti…te] \met"tete\ ["mettEnu] \"mettEnu\ Imperf. [m”t"te…vu] \met"tevu\ [m”t"ti…vi] \met"tevi\ [m”t"te…va] \met"teva\ [m”tt”"vammu] \mette"vammu\ [m”tt”"va…te] \mette"vate\ [m”t"te…vEnu] \met"tevEnu\ Pass. Rem. [m”t"t”tte] \met"t”tte\ [m”t"tisti] \met"testi [m”t"t”tte] \met"t”tte\ [m”t"t”ttEmu] \met"t”ttEmu\ [m”t"tistEve] \met"testEve\ [m”t"t”ttEnu] \met"t”ttEnu\ Subj. Imp. [m”t"tesse] \met"tesse\ [m”t"tissi] \met"tessi [m”t"tesse] \met"tesse\ [m”t"tessEmu] \met"tessEmu\ [m”t"tissEve] \met"tessEve\ [m”t"tessEnu] \met"tessEnu\ 26 35
Hypotheses for the absence of metaphony in 1Sg: The underlying representation of word-final [u] is \o\ which does not trigger raising \"metto\ (not \"mettu\) → ["mettu] (*["mittu]) (cf. Calabrese, 1985, 1988, 1998; Dyck, 1995; Frigeni, 2002) 27 36
Page 1 and 2: Aditi Lahiri, Judith Meinschaefer,
Page 3 and 4: Contents Acquaviva, Paolo (Dublin/K
Page 5 and 6: Inflectional morphology as lexeme f
Page 7 and 8: Why nouns? Why plural? Inflectional
Page 13 and 14: Metaphony in two Southern Italian d
Page 15 and 16: 3 12
Page 17 and 18: Metaphony (in general) Raising and/
Page 19 and 20: Issue Is metaphony phonological? P
Page 21 and 22: Characteristics of the chosen diale
Page 23 and 24: Previous research Phonologcial asp
Page 25 and 26: Piedimonte Matese (Campania) 13 22
Page 27 and 28: verbs total Lexical category nouns
Page 29 and 30: Examples Piedimonte Matese: Nouns &
Page 31 and 32: Gender Number Gender/ Number Morpho
Page 33 and 34: Phonological Model Lahiri & Reetz (
Page 35 and 36: Inventory of vowels (Piedimonte M.)
Page 37: 1SG 2SG 3SG 1PL 2PL 3PL Overview of
Page 41 and 42: 1SG 2SG 3SG 1PL 2PL 3PL Piedimonte
Page 43 and 44: Morphological analysis for metaphon
Page 45 and 46: Exceptions Asymmetric specification
Page 47 and 48: Exceptions All exceptions that are
Page 49 and 50: Paradigmatic distribution of stems
Page 51 and 52: Evidence from derivation (word-form
Page 53 and 54: M-Type 2 Not the lexicalized metap
Page 55 and 56: Cutrofiano (Salento - Puglia) 43 52
Page 57 and 58: System of stressed vowels and metap
Page 59 and 60: Examples (Garrapa, 2004; Gaglia, in
Page 61 and 62: Evidence from derivation (word-form
Page 63 and 64: Conclusions Different conditions f
Page 65 and 66: L. Garrapa: Italian Vowel Deletion
Page 89 and 90:
(4) C’est la combientième inonda
Page 91 and 92:
(15) a [[deux —] NP [ou [trois
Page 93 and 94:
Mismatches between morphological an
Page 95 and 96:
Martin Maiden, University of Oxford
Page 97 and 98:
3.1.5. The distribution of -tu beco
Page 99 and 100:
i. They are distinctively identifia
Page 101 and 102:
1 st . conj. 3 rd conj. Infinitive
Page 103 and 104:
References Aronoff, Mark. 1994. Mor
Page 105 and 106:
Nominal infinitives (and deverbal n
Page 107 and 108:
For the sake of simplicity, I start
Page 109 and 110:
Other verb classes • Unaccusative
Page 111 and 112:
• Atelic transitive verbs (37) lo
Page 113 and 114:
• The sharp decrease of frequency
Page 115 and 116:
• Infinitives preceded by a deter
Page 117 and 118:
4.2.2 Lexical category change in sy
Page 119 and 120:
5 Conclusion Is this of any relevan
Page 121 and 122:
Fabio Montermini CLLE - ERSS CNRS &
Page 123 and 124:
amí[t]i ‘friends’ gré[t]i ‘
Page 125 and 126:
stress on the penult, if there is o
Page 127 and 128:
(13) limóne ‘lemon’ farína
Page 129 and 130:
In all the cases of (18) the obliga
Page 131 and 132:
P 71 50 47 30 16 13 9 9 8
Page 133 and 134:
The features which are under evalua
Page 135 and 136:
Lignon S., Plénat M. (to appear),
Page 137 and 138:
form that preserves the most distin
Page 139 and 140:
Press. Bybee, J. and Slobin, D. (19
Page 141 and 142:
F. Plank (frans.plank@uni-konstanz.
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Interim conclusion: F. Plank (frans
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Same conclusion: F. Plank (frans.pl
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
On the context-sensitivity of Spani
Page 199 and 200:
(5) The grammar model (Pomino 2005)
Page 201 and 202:
(11) a. At MS [morphological struct
Page 203 and 204:
(17) Stress algorithm (Oltra Massue
Page 205 and 206:
(24) a. cant-a-mos [1pl], [S EQUALS
Page 207 and 208:
(34) Inward Sensitivity √/kant/ [
Page 209 and 210:
d. Strong preterite forms (P4) 1sg
Page 211 and 212:
(53) b. anduvimos Syntax √/and/ v
Page 213 and 214:
(59) c. dijo Syntax √/de-/+α Mor
Page 215 and 216:
Christoph Schwarze & Christine Kasc
Page 217 and 218:
The second and the third category w
Page 219 and 220:
Evidence for the recognition of the
Page 221:
with which they normally do not occ
Page 224 and 225:
a. ["jO…gurt] yogurt b. ["bjanko]
Page 226 and 227:
• Lexical /i/ appeared as [i] in
show all

morphological? - KOPS - Universität Konstanz

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?