morphological? - KOPS - Universität Konstanz

More documents

Recommendations

Info

F. Plank (frans.plank@uni-konstanz.de), The Direction of Derivation 1 Nov 07 How is the direction of derivation determined? Is it predictable? Given a semantic opposition encoded through derivational categories, is the direction of derivation predictable • for all languages alike, unconditionally or also perhaps depending on other typological parameters? • for each particular language (i.e., with languages randomly differing from one another)? optimistic answer: Yes! Since it is obviously semantic complexity which is the determinant (Is it?), directions are predictable and will be universally the same for any categorial opposition. pessimistic answer: It’s not predictable, neither universally nor languageparticularly, but has to be determined lexeme by lexeme, language by language. 141
F. Plank (frans.plank@uni-konstanz.de), The Direction of Derivation 1 Nov 07 The reason it that what needs to be derived depends on what is basic, i.e., on what happens to be lexicalised as part of the basic vocabulary of a language. And basic vocabulary is random. (Is it?) The right answer, as usual: It depends, namely on the categories concerned and on the lexical-semantic fields where such derivation occurs. For some categorial oppositions (but why these and not others?) and for some lexical-semantic fields (again: why these and not others?), the direction of derivation is predictable – within a language and probably also universally. 142
Page 1 and 2:
Aditi Lahiri, Judith Meinschaefer,
Page 3 and 4:
Contents Acquaviva, Paolo (Dublin/K
Page 5 and 6:
Inflectional morphology as lexeme f
Page 7 and 8:
Why nouns? Why plural? Inflectional
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Metaphony in two Southern Italian d
Page 15 and 16:
3 12
Page 17 and 18:
Metaphony (in general) Raising and/
Page 19 and 20:
Issue Is metaphony phonological? P
Page 21 and 22:
Characteristics of the chosen diale
Page 23 and 24:
Previous research Phonologcial asp
Page 25 and 26:
Piedimonte Matese (Campania) 13 22
Page 27 and 28:
verbs total Lexical category nouns
Page 29 and 30:
Examples Piedimonte Matese: Nouns &
Page 31 and 32:
Gender Number Gender/ Number Morpho
Page 33 and 34:
Phonological Model Lahiri & Reetz (
Page 35 and 36:
Inventory of vowels (Piedimonte M.)
Page 37 and 38:
1SG 2SG 3SG 1PL 2PL 3PL Overview of
Page 39 and 40:
Hypotheses for the absence of metap
Page 41 and 42:
1SG 2SG 3SG 1PL 2PL 3PL Piedimonte
Page 43 and 44:
Morphological analysis for metaphon
Page 45 and 46:
Exceptions Asymmetric specification
Page 47 and 48:
Exceptions All exceptions that are
Page 49 and 50:
Paradigmatic distribution of stems
Page 51 and 52:
Evidence from derivation (word-form
Page 53 and 54:
M-Type 2 Not the lexicalized metap
Page 55 and 56:
Cutrofiano (Salento - Puglia) 43 52
Page 57 and 58:
System of stressed vowels and metap
Page 59 and 60:
Examples (Garrapa, 2004; Gaglia, in
Page 61 and 62:
Evidence from derivation (word-form
Page 63 and 64:
Conclusions Different conditions f
Page 65 and 66:
L. Garrapa: Italian Vowel Deletion
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
(4) C’est la combientième inonda
Page 91 and 92:
(15) a [[deux —] NP [ou [trois
Page 93 and 94: Mismatches between morphological an
Page 95 and 96: Martin Maiden, University of Oxford
Page 97 and 98: 3.1.5. The distribution of -tu beco
Page 99 and 100: i. They are distinctively identifia
Page 101 and 102: 1 st . conj. 3 rd conj. Infinitive
Page 103 and 104: References Aronoff, Mark. 1994. Mor
Page 105 and 106: Nominal infinitives (and deverbal n
Page 107 and 108: For the sake of simplicity, I start
Page 109 and 110: Other verb classes • Unaccusative
Page 111 and 112: • Atelic transitive verbs (37) lo
Page 113 and 114: • The sharp decrease of frequency
Page 115 and 116: • Infinitives preceded by a deter
Page 117 and 118: 4.2.2 Lexical category change in sy
Page 119 and 120: 5 Conclusion Is this of any relevan
Page 121 and 122: Fabio Montermini CLLE - ERSS CNRS &
Page 123 and 124: amí[t]i ‘friends’ gré[t]i ‘
Page 125 and 126: stress on the penult, if there is o
Page 127 and 128: (13) limóne ‘lemon’ farína
Page 129 and 130: In all the cases of (18) the obliga
Page 131 and 132: P 71 50 47 30 16 13 9 9 8
Page 133 and 134: The features which are under evalua
Page 135 and 136: Lignon S., Plénat M. (to appear),
Page 137 and 138: form that preserves the most distin
Page 139 and 140: Press. Bybee, J. and Slobin, D. (19
Page 141 and 142: F. Plank (frans.plank@uni-konstanz.
Page 143: F. Plank (frans.plank@uni-konstanz.
Page 167 and 168: Interim conclusion: F. Plank (frans
Page 173 and 174: Same conclusion: F. Plank (frans.pl
Page 195 and 196:
F. Plank (frans.plank@uni-konstanz.
Page 197 and 198:
On the context-sensitivity of Spani
Page 199 and 200:
(5) The grammar model (Pomino 2005)
Page 201 and 202:
(11) a. At MS [morphological struct
Page 203 and 204:
(17) Stress algorithm (Oltra Massue
Page 205 and 206:
(24) a. cant-a-mos [1pl], [S EQUALS
Page 207 and 208:
(34) Inward Sensitivity √/kant/ [
Page 209 and 210:
d. Strong preterite forms (P4) 1sg
Page 211 and 212:
(53) b. anduvimos Syntax √/and/ v
Page 213 and 214:
(59) c. dijo Syntax √/de-/+α Mor
Page 215 and 216:
Christoph Schwarze & Christine Kasc
Page 217 and 218:
The second and the third category w
Page 219 and 220:
Evidence for the recognition of the
Page 221:
with which they normally do not occ
Page 224 and 225:
a. ["jO…gurt] yogurt b. ["bjanko]
Page 226 and 227:
• Lexical /i/ appeared as [i] in
show all

morphological? - KOPS - Universität Konstanz

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?